Prix de batcatBTC

BEARISH: BITCOIN ETFS SEE 5-WEEKS OF OUTFLOWS The last five weeks have seen a crushing $3.8 billion withdrawn from spot $BTC ETFs in the United States. Last week alone saw $316 million withdrawn, with the biggest outflows taking place in the week ending Jan 30 ($1.49 billion). $BTC

Last time this held: 2018, 2022 bear onsets. Recent buyers aren't panic selling - they're consistently exiting at a loss for 3 months straight. That's structural, not a flush. 365DMA is still at 1.0. The annual picture holds. The recent trend doesn't. Details ⤵️ - STH SOPR (90DMA): ~0.985 - below 1.0, declining - STH SOPR (7DMA): ~0.985 - confirms 90DMA, no divergence - STH SOPR (365DMA): ~1.00 - neutral, being dragged lower - Zone: Loss (orange) dominant since early 2026 Who's acting: STH are the weak hand here. Recent buyers are not just underwater - they're consistently realizing losses over a 3-month window. Not capitulation. Slow bleed. Verdict: Bearish. Until the 90DMA recovers and holds above 1.0, STH behavior is a structural headwind to any recovery. No demand shock visible yet. Written by IT Tech$BTC

Arthur Hayes just revealed his portfolio - and it looks a lot like what many macro-oriented investors are building. Stonks: gold, silver, copper, uranium miners, oil majors, defense contractors, and LatAm energy names. Crypto: $BTC $ETH , ZEC, HYPE. Plus physical gold. In other words: commodities + hard assets + selective crypto exposure. It’s a classic hedge against monetary and geopolitical uncertainty - a bet on tangible value and cyclical opportunities rather than pure growth narratives. My portfolio? Similar vibe: • BTC as digital gold • ETH as a core alt exposure • WhiteBIT Coin as a potential long-term play • SOL and XRP for network-specific opportunities • XAUT as on-chain gold exposure Not financial advice, but it highlights where the conversation is heading: diversification into assets that benefit from macro volatility and scarcity. What’s in your bag? Stonks, crypto, or both? 👇

Tariffs from Donald Trump delivered the biggest “discounts” for Brazil, China, and India - countries with strained relations with the United States of America and active Treasury selloffs. A 15% global rate (down from higher levels) is hardly a bullish signal for $BTC markets. Meanwhile, Japan and the United Kingdom - major buyers of U.S. debt - effectively face increased pressure via trade policy. The strategy looks like broad leverage: tightening screws across allies and rivals to force trade recalibration. That increases the likelihood of deal revisions in Europe and Japan. For markets, this isn’t a clean risk-on environment. Volatility remains, and selective opportunities matter more than broad narratives. How are you positioning? More risk or defensive plays? 👇

$BTC Everyone started calling the bottom after that big volume sell-off at $60K. But that's not how bottoms work. A selling climax stops the bleeding. That's it. It doesn't reverse anything it actually tells you how strong the downtrend is. After the flush, you still need: • The bounce • The retest • Months of range building • The shakeout that kills the last sellers • Confirmation that buyers actually have control That's five phases. Most take months. We haven't even started the first one. Look what happened after the climax. Price bounced into a $66-71K range. Volume never dried up it actually increased inside the range. That's not accumulation. In a real bottom, volume decreases as the range develops because sellers lose interest. Here, sellers stayed active the whole time. Big volume at the bottom means one thing: the move stopped. Not that it reversed. Massive difference. Most people have no idea