Prix de pippinPIPPIN

$PIPPIN - Mcap 370.76M$ - 72%/ 29.2K votes Bullish SC02 H1 - pending Long order. Entry lies within LVN + is not affected by any weak zone, estimated stop-loss around 6.07%. The uptrend is in the 77th cycle, amplitude +32.58%. #TradingSetup #CryptoInsights

Strength Sold, Not Accepted: $PIPPIN Faces Renewed Downside Pressure $PIPPIN is showing clear signs that recent strength is being sold into, not accepted. Price has pushed back into the 0.39–0.40 supply zone, but each attempt higher has been met with aggressive selling, preventing any meaningful acceptance above this area. Rather than seeing momentum expand on the upside, rallies are fading quickly a classic sign that this move is likely a corrective bounce into supply, not a trend reversal. Buyers are unable to defend higher levels, while sellers remain in control. From a market structure perspective, this behavior keeps the downside continuation scenario favored as long as price remains capped below the key resistance zone. 📉 Short Trade Setup: $PIPPIN Entry Zone: 0.388 – 0.402 Stop-Loss: 0.415 Take Profit Targets: TP1: 0.365 TP2: 0.335 TP3: 0.300 🔍 Technical Outlook Repeated rejection from 0.39–0.40 confirms active supply Lack of acceptance signals weak buyer conviction Momentum divergence favors sellers over buyers Unless price reclaims and holds above the resistance zone with strong volume and acceptance, rallies should be viewed as sell opportunities, not confirmation of a bullish reversal. ⚠️ As always, manage risk carefully and size positions appropriately. This is a technical perspective, not financial advice.

$PIPPIN is currently grinding sideways after a clear rejection from the 0.415 high, signaling exhaustion at a major resistance zone. Despite the earlier strong pump that briefly reclaimed short-term EMAs, price action has failed to sustain strength above the 0.40 psychological level. This inability to hold higher ground is now shifting momentum back in favor of the bears. From a technical perspective, the structure is weakening. Price is printing lower highs, while the RSI is curling downward, confirming bearish divergence. At the same time, volume has noticeably dried up, suggesting that buyers are losing conviction and upside continuation is becoming less likely without a fresh catalyst. This combination of fading momentum, resistance rejection, and divergence creates a favorable environment for a short continuation play, especially if support levels begin to crack. 🔴 Short Trade Setup: $PIPPIN Entry Zone: 0.394 – 0.41 Stop-Loss: 0.430 (tight, just above the local high) 🎯 Profit Targets: TP1: 0.380 TP2: 0.366 – 0.35 TP3: 0.33+ on a clean breakdown 📉 Trade Thesis: After reclaiming short-term EMAs, bulls failed to defend the move, allowing sellers to step back in near resistance. With RSI divergence and weakening volume confirming momentum loss, downside liquidity becomes the more probable path. A breakdown below local support could accelerate the move toward deeper targets. ⚠️ Risk Management Reminder: This is a momentum-based short setup. Use proper position sizing and manage risk carefully, especially in volatile market conditions. This is not financial advice. Trade responsibly.

Gold’s “Slow” Path to $15 Trillion: Why Boring Assets Keep Winning While Traders Chase Dopamine In a market obsessed with speed, novelty, and explosive upside, gold remains the quiet outlier — a slow mover that continues compounding value while drawing little excitement. It has become somewhat fashionable online to mock gold. Traders joke that it’s outdated, inefficient, or simply “too boring” compared to speculative narratives that dominate crypto and tech cycles. But beneath the memes and the noise, gold quietly added roughly $15 trillion in market cap over the last decade, outperforming a wide range of highly-hyped bets along the way. The disconnect isn’t really about performance — it’s about psychology. Markets reward different behaviors depending on the time horizon, and most participants today are not playing long-term games at all. The Market Loves Dopamine — Gold Doesn’t Provide It Assets like DOGE, RIVER, or Pippin are emblematic of the modern dopamine trade culture. They move fast, they trend aggressively, and they generate an emotional payoff. A 10% rally in an hour triggers far more excitement than a 10% return over a year — even if both outcomes add the same nominal value. This is why meme assets and narrative tokens can capture massive flows despite lacking long-term certainty or fundamental pricing anchors. They satisfy the short-term engagement loop: anticipation → volatility → reward → repeat. Gold, by contrast, does none of that. It doesn’t offer hype cycles, influencer pumps, or theatrical announcements. Its incentives are structural, not psychological, which makes it unappealing to the impatient. Asymmetric Certainty vs. Asymmetric Risk There is a subtle difference between chasing asymmetric upside and pursuing asymmetric certainty. Speculative traders allocate toward assets that can go 10x or 100x — even if probability-weighted outcomes are poor. They are gambling on narratives, liquidity waves, and attention. Meanwhile, gold offers a different asymmetry: protection, purchasing power, and macro certainty. It doesn’t promise explosive upside — it promises resilience. That difference rarely shows up in memes, but it shows up in wealth over long timeframes. Different Games, Different Results The most important lesson in this contrast is not which asset is “better” — it’s that not everyone at the table is playing the same game. Some chase dopamine. Others chase certainty. And in markets, game mismatch is where most confusion (and most losses) occur.