Prezzo di @ton_blockchainTON

$TON any hope?

most people think providing liquidity means splitting your tokens 50/50 and calling it a day. that's how uniswap v2 trained everyone to think about it. but it's not the only way, and depending on what you're holding, it might not be the most efficient way either. STONfi v2 supports arbitrary-ratio liquidity provision, meaning you can deposit tokens in any ratio, including single-sided. the protocol handles the rebalancing internally through a vault mechanism so your contribution aligns with the pool's math without you manually splitting assets first. if you're sitting on a stack of TON and don't want to sell half of it just to enter a pool, you no longer have to. the efficiency question is where it gets interesting. in correlated pairs like TON/tsTON, arbitrary provision works well because the assets move together and impermanent loss stays low near the peg. deploying idle capital single-sided in a high-volume pool makes sense when trading fees consistently offset the modest IL exposure. but in volatile or diverging pairs, the math shifts. impermanent loss in a constant-product pool depends on the price ratio change between assets, not the ratio you entered at. starting overweight in an asset that underperforms means the pool rebalances against you. classic 50/50 gives you more neutral exposure in those situations. STONfi's weighted pools add another layer, custom pool weights like 80/20 are a permanent feature, not just a deposit option. that changes the sensitivity of your position to price moves entirely. current protocol TVL sits at $30.26 million across $7.4 billion in all-time volume and 5.97 million unique swappers. understand your pair, simulate your position before entering, and account for IL regardless of which ratio you choose. $BTC $ZEC $ETH

The era when nearly every coin could rise simply because the market was bullish is fading fast. Capital is no longer spreading evenly across the crypto landscape. Instead, liquidity is concentrating into a small group of assets capable of attracting sustained attention and investment. $BTC , $ETH , and $SOL remain the primary liquidity hubs, absorbing a significant share of market participation. Meanwhile, $XRP, $BNB, $TRX, and $DOGE are behaving more like defensive assets, where investors prioritize stability and capital preservation over explosive growth. In the higher-risk segment, coins such as $SUI, $TON, $CORE, $AI, $GRASS, $TRUTH, $BSB, $LAYER, $MERL, and $ENSO continue to experience sharp price swings. However, volatility should not be mistaken for strength. In many cases, these movements reflect thin liquidity and inconsistent participation rather than sustainable momentum. On the other hand, several projects remain under persistent pressure as demand weakens, including $LIT, $PROVE, $BASED, $EDGE, $SPACE, $TRIA, $BLUR, $PENGU, $HUMA, $NOT, $BIO, $AR, and $FIL. A key trend is the growing concentration of capital in a handful of high-conviction narratives such as $HYPE, $ONDO, $ORDI, $JUP, $PYTH, $TIA, $SEI, and $INJ. While this concentration can support prices, it also creates vulnerability if market sentiment shifts unexpectedly. At the same time, relative strength continues to emerge from names like $NEAR, $WLD, $LAB, $BILL, $ICP, $PROS, and $ENA, which have demonstrated resilience despite broader market pressure. $BTC $ETH $SOL

$TON LONG TRADE ENTRY BREAKOUT REVERSAL 📈 ENTRY: 1.74 TARGET: 2.05+ $ZEC $HYPE

$TON LONG TRADE ENTRY BREAKOUT REVERSAL 📈 ENTRY: 1.74 TARGET: 2.05+ $LAB $BTC