Coreの‌価格CORE

$BTC $CORE Core products don't compete with each other. They compound. ETFs bring institutional capital. LSTs turn it liquid. AMPs optimize it. @sat_pay onboards retail. Every layer feeds the next. All roads lead to the same place. CORE. 🔶

$CORE is the next killer of $BTC Btc & $ETH eth

$BTC $CORE Privacy Infrastructure: The Missing Layer For Bitcoin at Scale Core Builders Privacy infrastructure isn’t a “nice-to-have” for Bitcoin; it’s a prerequisite for Bitcoin working at scale for real people, real businesses, and real institutions. The same qualities that make Bitcoin valuable (openness, neutrality, censorship resistance) also create a paradox: because the ledger is transparent, everyday activity can become legible in ways that undermine safety, competitiveness, and basic financial dignity. If Bitcoin is to be used as more than a settlement rail, if it’s going to host meaningful economic life, privacy infrastructure must exist alongside that transparency. That transparency also creates a concrete security downside: attackers can use publicly visible balances and transaction patterns to identify high-value targets. When a wallet’s holdings can be inferred on-chain, it becomes easier to tailor phishing attempts, social-engineer specific users, or even coordinate real-world coercion against individuals and teams that self-custody. In other words, the transparency that facilitates auditability can also aid adversaries in target selection, underscoring the need for privacy tooling that minimizes unnecessary exposure. @Coredao_Org’s 2026 revenue roadmap frames privacy infrastructure as a natural extension of its Bitcoin ethos, and that’s exactly right. Bitcoin’s design minimizes trust in intermediaries; privacy infrastructure extends that minimization into the realm of information leakage. Without privacy tooling, users are pushed into weaker options: reusing addresses, routing through custodians, or avoiding on-chain activity altogether. That doesn’t make Bitcoin safer; it merely concentrates risk and power in areas that Bitcoin was designed to circumvent. Privacy is also about operational reality. Individuals need protection from surveillance, phishing, physical coercion, and social targeting. Businesses require confidentiality regarding payroll, supplier relationships, inventory cycles, and treasury strategies. Institutions need to meet internal controls and client expectations without broadcasting every movement to competitors and counterparties. In each case, privacy isn’t about hiding wrongdoing; it’s about enabling normal economic behavior without forcing participants to reveal more than necessary. This matters even more in a BTCFi world. As Core’s roadmap puts it, @Coredao_Org will support privacy-focused applications that provide users and institutions with tools that match their operational and confidentiality needs. BTCFi isn’t just trading—it’s collateralization, credit, yield, hedging, and structured products. These activities involve strategies and positions that participants will not execute on transparent rails if doing so exposes them to front-running, copycat behavior, targeted attacks, or reputational risk. When market actors can’t protect sensitive information, they simply don’t participate, or they participate through centralized wrappers that reintroduce gatekeepers. That’s why “more private activity encourages deeper BTCFi participation,” as the @Coredao_Org roadmap argues. Privacy reduces the friction and risk premium associated with using Bitcoin in sophisticated financial contexts. When users feel safe interacting with applications—staking, borrowing, providing liquidity, earning yield—they do it more often and in larger sizes. That increased activity directly compounds network value: more transactions, more liquidity, more resilient markets, and more useful financial primitives built around BTC. From @Coredao_Org’s perspective, privacy infrastructure is not only philosophically aligned; it’s economically catalytic. Deeper participation “increases staking, yield, and overall network usage.” In practical terms, privacy tooling expands the addressable user base for BTCFi: individuals who won’t expose their entire financial life, companies that won’t leak business intelligence, and institutions that require confidentiality to operate. This creates a flywheel—privacy enables participation, participation increases usage, and usage supports sustainable revenue models tied to real economic throughput. Bitcoin’s transparency is a feature, but privacy infrastructure is what makes that feature livable for mainstream use. For Bitcoin to become a global, programmable financial layer without reverting to custodial dependence, it needs privacy rails that preserve choice, safety, and competitiveness, especially as BTCFi grows. Privacy infrastructure isn’t a side quest; it’s a critical adoption layer that makes participating in Bitcoin finance feel secure enough for everyone, from individuals to institutions. As BTCFi builders trying to ship products with real-world impact, we can’t treat privacy as an afterthought—we have to harden it into the infrastructure layer itself. Strong privacy rails reduce attack surface, protect users and businesses from unnecessary exposure, and make participation feel safe enough to move from experimentation to mainstream usage. If we want Bitcoin finance to scale beyond early adopters, we need to keep investing in the foundations that make it usable, secure, and institution-ready. Build for Bitcoin. Build on Core. 🏗️🔶

$BTC $CORE For years, spending Bitcoin meant selling it. That trade-off shaped behaviour. But what happens if millions can spend BTC without selling? That’s not a feature upgrade. That’s a psychological shift. Liquidity without liquidation rewires incentives overnight. If that activity runs through Core and loops back into CORE buybacks, the model stops being speculative. Usage feeds alignment. Volume feeds structure. I’ve learned quiet revolutions don’t announce themselves. They compound. If @sat_pay scales, the impact won’t feel loud. It’ll feel structural. And structural shifts are the ones that last.