About
WLFI
Ended--
Last price (USDT)
1.46M
24h total (USDT)
6.67M
Total vol (USDT)
2025-08-23 14:00:00 ~ 2025-09-01 12:30:00
Trading time (UTC+0)
2025-09-01 14:00:00 ~ 2025-09-01 18:00:00
Delivery time (UTC+0)
Total supply100.00B
Resources
Introduction
World Liberty Financial, Inc. is inspired by Donald J. Trump’s vision to pioneer a new era of Decentralized Finance (DeFi), with a mission to democratize financial opportunities and strengthen the US Dollar’s global status through US dollar-based stablecoins and DeFi applications.
What kind of judicial game is hidden behind CZ's pardon?
Author: The Pomp Podcast Translation: Odaily, Azuma Original Title: CZ's Lawyer Reveals the Story Behind the "Pardon" Opening Pompliano: Hello everyone, today we are going to have a very important and serious conversation. I have invited CZ's personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, who was deeply involved in the process of CZ receiving a pardon. I have seen a lot of controversy online about CZ's pardon, such as how he was released, whether it involved a "quid pro quo," or even possible corruption. So I contacted Teresa, hoping to discuss these concerns face-to-face, whether they are simple details or sharp questions. What was the reason for the pardon? Pompliano: First, please tell us, what was CZ accused of? What was the reason for his pardon? Teresa: CZ was accused of Binance's failure to implement and maintain anti-money laundering programs and compliance systems. It should be made clear that this is a regulatory violation, a compliance issue, but there was no money laundering involved—Binance simply did not implement an anti-money laundering plan. So, he was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted in the first place. Trump also said in the pardon statement that he did not believe CZ committed any crime and should not have been prosecuted. So, he was pardoned in the name of justice. CZ is the only person ever prosecuted, or even sent to jail, for this specific accusation or similar nature (characterized by no fraud, no victims, no criminal record, etc.). The unfair treatment he received is very different from what anyone else in history has faced. Pompliano: Why was he treated unfairly? Teresa: I think this is part of the "war on crypto" initiated by regulators. It happened right after the FTX collapse, and they needed to take action against someone, to prosecute and persecute someone, and unfortunately, CZ became that person. Pompliano: If I understand correctly, it's because the company did or didn't do certain things, so the regulators targeted them. Is it common for executives to bear personal responsibility for this? On the one hand, I can understand people saying the CEO should be responsible for the company's actions; but on the other hand (I did a quick Google search), large banks or other financial institutions have also been accused of similar things, but the executives themselves were not implicated. What is the usual way of handling this for companies and executives, and what's the difference? Teresa: Exactly right, executives are never prosecuted for these kinds of things. You can name any large financial institution, and it has likely been accused of the same or even worse violations, but we've never seen a CEO prosecuted. This has never happened, and no other executive has ever been prosecuted for these specific crimes—this is not how the judicial system usually operates. Revealing the Pardon Process Pompliano: We now know that CZ was indeed pardoned, but I still have many questions. I've seen a lot of speculation about the inside story of the pardon... So how exactly was the pardon achieved? Was there some kind of "quid pro quo"? Was there corruption? I hope you can first introduce us to the process of obtaining a pardon, and then we can discuss the various speculations in the community. Teresa: Okay. To obtain a pardon, you must first fill out an application and write out the reasons for your request. Then a series of people will review these materials and give their opinions. The Department of Justice, the pardon attorney, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, and the White House Counsel's Office are all involved. So before the pardon, there is a lot of legal review, and all of these reviews must be conducted on the submitted application. Therefore, it is a relatively standardized process. Pompliano: After you submit the application, who receives it? Is there a dedicated pardon office? Is there a specific person in charge? Is the application submitted directly to the President? The President can't possibly personally screen hundreds or thousands of applications, so who handles this process? Teresa: There are many ways a pardon application can be processed, depending on how the application is submitted, such as whether it is through a dedicated pardon attorney, through the Department of Justice website, or through other channels, and then reviewed by the relevant personnel. I know that different people submit pardon applications in different ways, but the President does not personally receive these applications, at least not in any case I am aware of. Pompliano: So after the application is submitted, someone reviews it and provides advice to the President, such as whether the pardon should be considered. Is this a unilateral decision by the President? Or is there a process involving recommendations from certain people (such as staff, administrators, the Department of Justice, etc.)? Teresa: I'm not sure about the specific internal operations of the White House, but there must be some people who need to sign off, the White House Counsel's Office needs to sign, and the pardon attorney needs to sign. Of course, the final decision rests with the President, who must personally sign it. So, it's a collaborative process among different people, but I was not involved in those specific discussions, so I can't provide more details. Does the Pardon Involve a "Quid Pro Quo"? Pompliano: There are many speculations surrounding CZ, Binance, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and Trump. I probably don't need to repeat all the rumors; you've surely seen them all... So, how would you refute the speculation about a "quid pro quo" (buying a pardon)? How should people understand the relationship between business transactions and the pardon process? Teresa: Well... it's really just a pile of misstatements. When you see those suspicions, have you seen any verified information? You might see some media reports quoting another media report, and then quoting yet another, but none of these have any real basis—just so-called "sources close to someone," which usually points to an unreliable source. For example, the media always refers to World Liberty as Trump's company, but I've never seen any evidence for that. I saw Trump's "honorary member" status on their website, and some reports mention that certain Trump entities hold a minority stake in the company, but I haven't seen any evidence proving it's Trump's company. Some people always take rumors as facts and then use that as a premise for further assumptions, but the facts are often not so. The speculation about a "quid pro quo" is based on this, but these claims simply don't make sense. For example, WLFI's stablecoin USD1 is issued on BSC, which is an open and permissionless action—it's like listing a product on an e-commerce platform, but that doesn't mean I have a special relationship with the platform owner. That's the situation here. The assumption is meaningless, but some people make judgments based on these assumptions, which clearly shows a basic misunderstanding of how business or blockchain works. There are also accusations about Binance. Some say MGX used USD1 to invest in Binance, which proves a relationship between Binance and WLFI, and also means Binance and CZ are "bribing" the President. This is also a fundamental misunderstanding of how stablecoins and business models work. It's like if I buy wheat from you and you pay me in Swiss francs, then I become an investor in Swiss francs and am "bribing" Swiss politicians. It makes no sense, and that's exactly what these accusations are like. So, these speculations are fundamentally misunderstandings. Many people who understand how ridiculous these accusations are don't pay much attention to them, but those who don't understand the basic operating models keep repeating them, and as a result, they spread wider and wider. That's what we're seeing now. Pompliano: I know you're a very good lawyer. I've always wanted to be a lawyer—though I'm not smart enough—but I think I can "test" you a bit. Is USD1 only issued on BSC, or is it also issued on other chains? Teresa: You're very smart. That's right, USD1 is indeed also present on other chains. That's another key point—other exchanges also hold USD1, but no one claims those exchanges are sending money to the President; only Binance is being attacked by these rumors. Pompliano: Have CEOs of other crypto exchanges ever received pardons from the Trump administration? Teresa: I believe Arthur Hayes also received a pardon; he is the CEO of BitMEX. By the way, the pardon mechanism has always existed, since the founding of the United States, including the British period, and covers both civil and criminal individuals and entities. So pardons have actually existed for a long time; it's just that recently they've focused more on criminal and personal issues. Also, Silk Road's Ross Ulbricht received a pardon. Pompliano: Let me return to the critics' perspective. Some people might think "there's no smoke without fire." Is there any possible payment method, like Trump having a secret bitcoin wallet and CZ or Binance sending him money directly? Is that possible, or is it just a conspiracy theory? Teresa: I know CZ, so I know that would never happen. He's not that kind of person. I know a bit about the President—I don't know him, though I'd love to—but I don't think that's something he would do, and I don't know if he has a bitcoin wallet. If he did, I'd be a bit surprised. If something like that really happened, we would have seen reports about it already, and it would be in a very verifiable and credible way. That's one of the beauties of distributed ledger technology—transparency. Since there isn't any, it means nothing like that happened. CZ's Personal Approach Pompliano: I've known CZ for many years. I've always thought he was a very calm, composed, and organized person. I interviewed him earlier this year, and he talked about coming from a village with no electricity or running water, yet eventually becoming one of the richest people in the world. I can't imagine how hard it must have been to go through all that. How did he handle it all? This is actually a very important but often overlooked part of the whole story—beyond the law, politics, facts, and rumors, CZ is also a person, with a family and emotions. How did he face all this? Teresa: This is another very impressive thing about CZ. As his lawyer, my emotions fluctuated more than his, because he is so calm and composed, handling everything with poise. I'm an optimist myself, but his optimism is extraordinary—he always sees the good side of things, which I really admire. I don't know anyone who can handle things as calmly and composedly as he does, and he is always grateful for everything he has. I'm glad you brought up the personal side of CZ, because sometimes when I see people attacking him over certain things, like reading reports that are complete rumors, it really makes me angry. I think it's very important to value everyone's humanity. When you attack or slander someone, or try to prevent someone from being pardoned, remember that this is also a person with a family, and you shouldn't treat them that way. From Politicians Stirring the Pot to Regulatory Attitude Swings Pompliano: I remember Elizabeth Warren (note: Democratic Senator) made a lot of criticisms about CZ. I recall you (or maybe CZ himself) responded that her statements were "inaccurate," but then she responded again, and it became more and more intense, almost like a "soap opera"... Can you tell us about this scene? Is it normal for politicians to get involved and respond to such matters? What exactly happened? Teresa: First, Warren posted on social media saying CZ was convicted, but in fact, CZ was not convicted. Then Warren accused CZ of doing something improper in obtaining or requesting a pardon, further adding criminal responsibility to him. These statements are also inaccurate. No matter who you are, you can't just say someone committed a crime or accuse them of multiple crimes they didn't commit without any basis. Of course, government officials sometimes enjoy certain immunities, but those immunities should be limited. I hope we can focus more on this, because the immunities these people enjoy are not what our founding fathers intended. This is a big problem, especially when politicians can profoundly affect people's lives and livelihoods with their words, so limiting immunity is particularly important. Pompliano: It feels like this is actually a political issue. Regarding crypto regulation, we've seen all kinds of crackdowns in recent years, but now the new administration is taking a completely different attitude. This political nature is like a pendulum. Do you think we'll continue to see this back-and-forth? Should people in the industry expect this volatility, or do you think once there's a policy tailwind, it will be very difficult to swing back to a hard crackdown? Teresa: Yes, I hope the pendulum doesn't keep swinging like this. I think now we can promote some innovation in the US to make all this more stable. For example, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins wants all markets to be on-chain, and once they're on-chain, it's hard to move them off-chain again. We shouldn't avoid or try to stop revolutionary technology—it's something we need to embrace. This isn't just limited to financial services; in all other application scenarios as well, once we make progress in this direction, it's hard to go back to past technologies. The Possibility of CZ Returning to Binance Pompliano: After CZ's pardon, what changes have happened at Binance? Will he return to Binance? Is Binance making any business adjustments? I'm not sure how much you know, but what is Binance's current situation? Teresa: He will not return to Binance now. Binance is still subject to all restrictions from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Treasury Department (FinCen), and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It's crazy—most companies only face accountability from one or two government agencies, but Binance has five, and this is in a situation where there is no fraud, no victims, and no criminal record. Binance is still subject to oversight mechanisms. The Treasury Department, through FinCen, has arranged a monitor to ensure they comply with US laws—even though Binance has been excluded from the US and has no US customers, so there is actually no need to comply with US laws. I'm glad the accusations against CZ have basically been clarified now, but this has already caused damage to Binance and CZ. But I think the biggest victim is actually the US—Binance still hasn't returned to the US market, which means we've lost the liquidity of the world's largest crypto exchange. To be the biggest market, you need the most liquidity. For example, users want more platform choices, and projects want to list on the largest exchange, but now that exchange isn't in the US, so some people choose to launch projects outside the US to get listed on Binance.
CZ's personal lawyer responds to "insider deal of money and pardon with Trump"
Original Title: Why Did Trump Pardon Binance Founder CZ? Original Source: The Pomp Podcast Translated by: Azuma, Odaily Editor's note: On October 22, U.S. President Trump officially signed a pardon for CZ, but there is still much information about the pardon itself that the public does not fully understand. On November 15, CZ's personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, a partner at the well-known law firm Baker Hostetler, was interviewed by Morgan Creek founder Anthony Pompliano. In her conversation with Pompliano, Teresa mentioned many previously undisclosed details regarding the charges themselves as well as the reasons and process for the pardon. CZ himself has reposted and liked Teresa's interview content. The following is a transcript of Teresa's interview, compiled and translated by Odaily. Opening · Pompliano:Hello everyone, today we are going to have a very important and serious conversation. I have invited CZ's personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, who was deeply involved in the process of CZ receiving a pardon. I have seen a lot of controversy online about CZ's pardon, such as how he was released, whether it involved "quid pro quo," or even possible corruption. So I reached out to Teresa, hoping to discuss these concerns face-to-face, whether they are simple details or sharp questions. What was the reason for the pardon? · Pompliano:First, please tell us, what was CZ accused of? What was the reason for his pardon? Teresa:CZ was accused of Binance failing to implement and maintain anti-money laundering programs and compliance systems. To be clear, this is a regulatory violation, a compliance issue, but there was no money laundering involved—Binance simply did not implement an anti-money laundering plan. So, he was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted in the first place. Trump also said in his pardon statement that he did not believe CZ committed any crime, nor should he have been prosecuted. So, he was pardoned in the name of justice. CZ is the only person ever prosecuted, or even sent to jail, for this specific type of charge or similar nature (characterized by no fraud, no victims, no criminal record, etc.). The unfair treatment he received is very different from how anyone else in history has been treated. · Pompliano:Why was he treated unfairly? Teresa:I think this was part of the regulators' "war on crypto." It happened right after the FTX collapse, and they needed to take action against someone, to prosecute and persecute someone, and unfortunately, CZ became that person. · Pompliano:If I understand correctly, it's because the company did or didn't do certain things, so the regulators targeted them. Is it common for executives to bear personal responsibility for this? On one hand, I can understand people saying the CEO should be responsible for the company's actions; but on the other hand (I did a quick Google search), large banks or other financial institutions have also been accused of similar things, but the executives themselves were not implicated. What is the usual way of handling this for companies and executives, and what are the differences? Teresa:Absolutely right, executives are never prosecuted for these kinds of things. You can name any large financial institution, and it has likely been accused of the same or even worse violations, but we have never seen a CEO prosecuted. This has never happened, nor have any other executives been prosecuted for these specific crimes; this is not how the judicial system typically operates. Revealing the Pardon Process · Pompliano:We now know that CZ did receive a pardon, but I still have many questions. I've seen a lot of speculation about the inside story of the pardon... So how exactly was the pardon achieved? Was there some kind of "quid pro quo"? Was there corruption? I hope you can first introduce the process of obtaining a pardon, and then we can discuss the various speculations in the community. Teresa:Okay. To obtain a pardon, you must first fill out an application and state your reasons for applying. Then a series of people will review these materials and give their opinions. The Department of Justice, the pardon attorney, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, and the White House Counsel's Office are all involved. So before a pardon is granted, there is a lot of legal review, and all of these reviews must be conducted on the submitted application. Therefore, this is a relatively standardized process. · Pompliano:After you submit the application, who receives it? Is there a dedicated pardon office? Is there a person in charge? Is the application submitted directly to the president? The president can't possibly personally screen hundreds or thousands of applications, so who handles this process? Teresa:There are many ways to process a pardon application, depending on how the application is submitted, such as through a dedicated pardon attorney, through the Department of Justice website, or through other channels, and then reviewed by the appropriate personnel. I know that different people submit pardon applications in different ways, but the president does not personally receive these applications, at least not in any case I know of. · Pompliano:So after the application is submitted, someone will review it and provide advice to the president, such as whether the pardon should be considered. Is this a unilateral decision by the president? Or is there a process involving recommendations from certain people (such as staff, administrators, the Department of Justice, etc.)? Teresa:I'm not sure about the specific operations inside the White House, but there are definitely people who need to sign off, the White House Counsel's Office needs to sign, and the pardon attorney needs to sign. Of course, the final decision rests with the president, who must personally sign it. So, it's a collaborative process involving different people, but I wasn't involved in those specific discussions, so I can't provide more details. Does the pardon involve "quid pro quo"? · Pompliano:There are a lot of speculations surrounding CZ, Binance, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and Trump. I probably don't need to repeat all the rumors, you've definitely seen them... So, how would you refute the speculation about "quid pro quo" (buying a pardon)? How should people understand the relationship between business transactions and the pardon process? Teresa:Well... this is actually just a pile of many misstatements. When you see those suspicions, have you seen any verified information? You might see some media reports quoting another media report, and then quoting yet another, but these have no real basis, only so-called "sources close to someone," which usually points to an unreliable source. For example, the media always refers to World Liberty as Trump's company, but I have never seen any evidence. I saw Trump's "honorary member" status on their website, and some reports mention that certain Trump entities hold a minority stake in the company, but I have not seen any evidence proving this is Trump's company. Some people always take rumors as facts and then use that as a premise to make assumptions, but the facts are often not so. The speculation about "quid pro quo" is based on this, but these claims simply don't make sense. For example, WLFI's stablecoin USD1 is issued on BSC, which is an open and permissionless action. It's like listing a product on an e-commerce platform; it doesn't mean I have any special relationship with the platform owner. That's the situation—these assumptions are meaningless, but some people make judgments based on them, which clearly shows a basic misunderstanding of how business or blockchain works. There are also accusations about Binance. Some say MGX invested in Binance using USD1, which proves a relationship between Binance and WLFI, and also that Binance and CZ are "bribing" the president. This is also a fundamental misunderstanding of how stablecoins and business models work. It's like if I buy wheat from you and you pay me in Swiss francs, then I become an investor in Swiss francs, which means I'm "bribing" Swiss politicians. It makes no sense at all, and it's exactly the same as the current accusations. So, these speculations are fundamentally misunderstandings. Many people who understand how ridiculous these accusations are don't pay much attention to them, but those who don't understand the basic operating models keep repeating them, and as a result, they spread further and further. That's what we're seeing now. · Pompliano:I know you're a very good lawyer. I've always wanted to be a lawyer, though I'm not smart enough, but I think I can "quiz" you a bit. Is USD1 only issued on BSC, or is it also issued on other chains? Teresa:You're very smart. Yes, USD1 does exist on other chains as well. That's another key point—other exchanges also hold USD1, but no one says those exchanges are sending money to the president; only Binance is being attacked by these rumors. · Pompliano:Have any other crypto exchange CEOs ever received a pardon from the Trump administration? Teresa: I believe Arthur Hayes also received a pardon, he is the CEO of BitMEX. By the way, the pardon mechanism has always existed, since the founding of the United States, including the British period, and for both civil and criminal offenses for individuals and entities. So pardons have actually been around for a long time, it's just that recently they've focused more on criminal and personal issues. Also, Silk Road's Ross Ulbricht received a pardon. · Pompliano:Let me return to the critics' perspective. Some people might think "there's no smoke without fire." So is there any possibility of some kind of payment, like Trump having a secret bitcoin wallet and CZ or Binance sending him money directly? Is that possible, or is it just a conspiracy theory? Teresa: I know CZ, so I know this would never happen. He's not that kind of person. I know a bit about the president—I don't know him, though I'd love to—but I don't think that's something he would do, and I don't know if he has a bitcoin wallet. If he did, I'd be surprised. If something like that really happened, we would have seen reports about it already, and it would be in a very verifiable and credible way. That's one of the beauties of distributed ledger technology—transparency. Since there isn't, it means it really didn't happen. CZ's Personal Approach · Pompliano:I've known CZ for many years. I've always thought he was a very calm, composed, and methodical person. I interviewed him earlier this year, and he talked about coming from a village with no electricity or running water, but eventually becoming one of the richest people in the world. I can't imagine how hard it must have been to go through all that—how did he handle it all? This is actually a very important but often overlooked part of the whole thing. Beyond the law, politics, facts, and rumors, CZ is also a person, he has a family, he has emotional issues—how did he face all this? Teresa:This is another very impressive thing about CZ. As his lawyer, my emotions fluctuate more than his, because he is so calm and composed, handling everything with ease. I'm an optimist myself, but his level of optimism is extraordinary—he always sees the good side of things, and I really admire that. I don't know anyone who can handle things as calmly and composedly as he does, and he is always grateful for everything he has. I'm glad you brought up the personal side of CZ, because sometimes when I see people attacking him over certain things, like reading reports that are complete rumors, it really makes me angry. I think it's important to value everyone's humanity. When you attack or slander someone, or try to prevent someone from getting a pardon, remember that this is also a person with a family, and you shouldn't treat him that way. From Politicians "Setting the Tone": The Bipolar Swings of Regulatory Attitudes · Pompliano:I remember Elizabeth Warren (note: Democratic Senator) made a lot of criticisms about CZ. I remember you (or maybe CZ himself) replied to her that her statements were "inaccurate," but then she responded again, and it got more and more intense, almost like a "soap opera"... Can you tell us about this scene? Is it normal for politicians to step in and respond to such matters? What exactly happened? Teresa:First, Warren posted on social media saying CZ was convicted, but in fact CZ was not convicted. Then Warren accused CZ of doing improper things in obtaining or requesting a pardon, further attributing criminal responsibility to him. These statements are also inaccurate. No matter who you are, you can't just say someone committed a crime or accuse them of multiple crimes they didn't commit without any basis. Of course, government officials have some immunity in certain situations, but that immunity should be limited. I hope we can focus more on this, because the immunity these people enjoy is not what our founding fathers intended. This is a big problem, especially when politicians can profoundly affect people's lives and livelihoods with their words, so limiting immunity is particularly important. · Pompliano:It feels like this is actually a political issue. In terms of crypto regulation, we've seen all kinds of crackdowns in recent years, but now the new administration has taken a completely different attitude. This political nature is like a pendulum—do you think we'll continue to see this back-and-forth? Should people in the industry expect this volatility, or do you think once there's a policy tailwind, it will be very difficult to swing back to a tough crackdown? Teresa:Yes, I hope the pendulum doesn't keep swinging back and forth like this. I think we can now drive some innovation in the U.S. to make all this more stable. For example, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins wants all markets to be on-chain, and once they're on-chain, it's hard to move them off-chain again. We shouldn't avoid or try to stop revolutionary technology—it's something we need to embrace. This isn't just limited to financial services; it's true for all other application scenarios as well. Once we make progress in this direction, it's hard to go back to the old technology. The Possibility of CZ Returning to Binance · Pompliano:After CZ's pardon, what changes have happened at Binance? Will he return to Binance? Is Binance making any business adjustments? I'm not sure how much you know, but what is Binance's current situation? Teresa: He will not return to Binance now. Binance is still facing all the restrictions from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Treasury Department (FinCen), and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It's crazy—most companies only face accountability from one or two government agencies, but Binance has five, and that's in a situation where there is no fraud, no victims, and no criminal record. Binance is still subject to supervision mechanisms. The Treasury Department, through FinCen, has arranged a monitor to ensure they comply with U.S. law—even though Binance has been excluded from the U.S. and has no U.S. customers, so there is actually no need to comply with U.S. law. I'm glad that the accusations against CZ have now been largely clarified, but this has already caused damage to Binance and CZ. But I think, in fact, the biggest victim is the United States—Binance still hasn't returned to the U.S. market, which means we've lost the liquidity of the world's largest crypto exchange. To be the biggest market, you need the most liquidity. For example, users want more platform choices, and projects want to be listed on the biggest exchange, but now that exchange isn't in the U.S., so some people choose to launch projects outside the U.S. in order to get listed on Binance.
Zhao Changpeng's lawyer shares the behind-the-scenes story of the "pardon"
Original:The Pomp Podcast Translator:Azuma; Editor: Hao Fangzhou Produced by | Odaily (ID: o-daily) Editor's note: On October 22, U.S. President Trump officially signed a pardon for CZ—see “ Trump Pardons Binance Founder CZ: 13 Months, From Imprisonment to Complete Freedom ” for details. However, there is still much information about the pardon itself that the public does not fully understand. On November 15, CZ’s personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, a partner at the well-known law firm Baker Hostetler, was interviewed by Morgan Creek founder Anthony Pompliano. In her conversation with Pompliano, Teresa revealed many previously undisclosed details about the charges and the reasons and process for the pardon. CZ himself has reposted and liked Teresa’s interview. The following is a written summary of Teresa’s interview, compiled and translated by Odaily. Opening Pompliano: Hello everyone, today we are going to have a very important and serious conversation. I have invited CZ’s personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, who was deeply involved in the process of CZ receiving a pardon. I’ve seen a lot of controversy online about CZ’s pardon, such as how he was released, whether it involved “pay-for-play,” or even possible corruption. So I reached out to Teresa, hoping to discuss these concerns face-to-face, whether they are simple details or sharp questions. What was the reason for the pardon? Pompliano: First, please tell us, what was CZ accused of? What was the reason for his pardon? Teresa: CZ was accused of Binance’s failure to implement and maintain anti-money laundering programs and compliance systems.It’s important to clarify that this was a regulatory violation, a compliance issue, but there was no money laundering involved—Binance simply failed to implement an anti-money laundering plan. So, he was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted in the first place. Trump also stated in the pardon declaration that he did not believe CZ committed any crime, nor should he have been prosecuted.So, he was pardoned to uphold justice. CZ is the only person to have been prosecuted, and even imprisoned, for this specific type of charge or similar nature (characterized by no fraud, no victims, no criminal record, etc.).The unfair treatment he received is very different from how anyone else in history has been treated. Pompliano: Why was he treated unfairly? Teresa: I believe this was part of the regulators’ “war on crypto.” It happened right after the FTX collapse, and they needed to take action against someone, to prosecute and persecute someone, and unfortunately, CZ became that person. Pompliano: If I understand correctly, it’s because the company did or didn’t do certain things that the regulators targeted them. Is it common for executives to bear personal responsibility for this? On one hand, I can understand people saying the CEO should be responsible for the company’s actions; but on the other hand (I did a quick Google search), large banks or other financial institutions have also been accused of similar things, but the executives themselves were never implicated. What is the usual approach and distinction between companies and executives? Teresa: That’s absolutely right,executives are never prosecuted for these kinds of things.You could name any large financial institution, and it’s likely they’ve been accused of the same or even worse violations, but we’ve never seen a CEO prosecuted. It’s never happened, and no other executive has ever been prosecuted for these specific offenses—this is not how the justice system typically works. Revealing the Pardon Process Pompliano: We now know that CZ was indeed pardoned, but I still have many questions. I’ve seen a lot of speculation about the inside story of the pardon... So how exactly was the pardon achieved? Was there any “pay-for-play”? Was there corruption? I hope you can first introduce the process of obtaining a pardon, and then we can discuss the various speculations in the community. Teresa: Sure. To obtain a pardon, you must first fill out an application and state your reasons for applying. Then, a series of people will review these materials and provide their opinions. The Department of Justice, the pardon attorney, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, and the White House Counsel’s Office are all involved. So before a pardon is granted, there is a lot of legal review, and all of this must be done on the submitted application. Therefore,it’s a relatively standardized process. Pompliano: When you submit the application, who receives it? Is there a dedicated pardon office? Is there a specific person in charge? Is the application submitted directly to the President? The President can’t possibly review hundreds or thousands of applications personally, so who handles them in the process? Teresa: There are many ways a pardon application can be processed, depending on how it is submitted—whether through a dedicated pardon attorney, the Department of Justice website, or other channels, and ultimately it is reviewed by staff. I know that people submit pardon applications in different ways,but the President does not personally receive these applications, at least not in any case I know of. Pompliano: So after the application is submitted, someone reviews it and gives the President advice, such as whether the pardon should be considered. Is it a unilateral decision by the President? Or is there a process involving recommendations from staff, administrators, the Department of Justice, etc.? Teresa: I’m not sure about the specific internal operations of the White House, but there are definitely people who need to sign off, the White House Counsel’s Office needs to sign, and the pardon attorney needs to sign. Of course,the final decision rests with the President, who must sign personally. So, it’s a collaborative process among different people, but I wasn’t involved in those specific discussions, so I can’t provide more details. Does the pardon involve “pay-for-play”? Pompliano: There’s a lot of speculation about CZ, Binance, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and Trump. I probably don’t need to repeat all the rumors—you’ve surely seen them... So, how would you refute the speculation about “pay-for-play” (buying a pardon)? How should people understand the relationship between business transactions and the pardon process? Teresa: Well... this is really just a pile-up of a lot of false statements. When you see those suspicions, have you ever seen any verified information? You might see some media quoting another media outlet, which quotes yet another,but none of these have any real basis, only so-called “sources close to someone,” which usually points to an unreliable source. For example, the media always refers to World Liberty as Trump’s company, but I’ve never seen any evidence. I saw Trump listed as an “honorary member” on their website, and there are reports that some Trump entities hold a minority stake in the company, but I haven’t seen any evidence proving it’s Trump’s company. Some people always treat rumors as facts and then use that as a premise for assumptions, but that’s often not the case. The speculation about “pay-for-play” is based on this, but these claims simply don’t make sense.For example, WLFI’s stablecoin USD1 is issued on BSC, which is an open and permissionless action. It’s like listing a product on an e-commerce platform—it doesn’t mean you have a special relationship with the platform owner. That’s the situation. The assumptions are meaningless, but people make judgments based on them, which is clearly a basic misunderstanding of how business or blockchain works. There are also accusations about Binance. Some say MGX invested in Binance using USD1, which supposedly proves a relationship between Binance and WLFI, and also that Binance and CZ are “bribing” the President. This is also a fundamental misunderstanding of how stablecoins and business models work. It’s like if I buy wheat from you and you pay in Swiss francs, then I become an investor in Swiss francs and am “bribing” Swiss politicians. It makes no sense, and it’s the same as the current accusations. So, these speculations are fundamentally misunderstandings. Many people who understand how absurd these accusations are don’t pay much attention to them, but those who don’t understand the basic operating models keep repeating them, and they spread further and further. That’s what we’re seeing now. Pompliano: I know you’re a very good lawyer. I always wanted to be a lawyer, though I’m not smart enough, but maybe I can “test” you a bit. Is USD1 only issued on BSC, or is it also on other chains? Teresa: You’re very smart. Yes, USD1 is also on other chains. That’s another key point—other exchanges also hold USD1, but no one says those exchanges are sending money to the President, only Binance is attacked by these rumors. Pompliano: Have any other crypto exchange CEOs received pardons from the Trump administration? Teresa:I believe Arthur Hayes also received a pardon,he’s the CEO of BitMEX. By the way, the pardon mechanism has always existed, since the founding of the United States, including the British period, and covers both civil and criminal offenses for individuals and entities. So pardons have actually existed for a long time; it’s just that recently the focus has shifted more to criminal and personal issues. Oh, and also Ross Ulbricht of Silk Road, he was pardoned as well. Pompliano: Let me return to the critics’ perspective. Some people might think “there’s no smoke without fire.” Is there any possibility of a payment, like Trump having a secret bitcoin wallet and CZ or Binance sending him money directly? Is that possible, or is it just a conspiracy theory? Teresa:I know CZ, so I know that would never happen. He’s not that kind of person.I know a bit about the President—I don’t know him personally, though I’d love to—but I don’t think that’s something he would do. I also don’t know if he has a bitcoin wallet, and if he did, I’d be surprised. If something like that really happened, we would have seen reports about it already, and it would be in a very verifiable and credible way. That’s one of the beauties of distributed ledger technology—transparency. Since there’s nothing, it means nothing happened. CZ’s Personal Approach Pompliano: I’ve known CZ for many years. I’ve always thought he’s a very calm, composed, and organized person. I interviewed him earlier this year, and he talked about coming from a village with no electricity or running water, but eventually becoming one of the richest people in the world. I can’t imagine how hard it must have been to go through all this—how did he handle it? This is actually a very important but often overlooked part of the whole story. Beyond the law, politics, facts, and rumors, CZ is also a person, with a family and emotions. How did he face all of this? Teresa: This is another very impressive thing about CZ. As his lawyer, my emotions fluctuated more than his, because he is so calm and composed, handling everything with poise. I’m an optimist myself, but his optimism is extraordinary—he always sees the good side of things, and I really admire that.I don’t know anyone who can handle things as calmly and composedly as he does, and he is always grateful for everything he has. I’m glad you brought up the personal side of CZ, because sometimes when I see people attacking him over certain things, or read reports that are complete rumors, it really makes me angry. I think it’s important to value everyone’s humanity. When you attack or slander someone, or try to prevent someone from getting a pardon, remember that person also has a family—you shouldn’t treat them that way. From Politicians “Setting the Tone”: The Bipolar Swings of Regulatory Attitudes Pompliano: I remember Elizabeth Warren (note: Democratic Senator) made a lot of criticisms about CZ. I recall you (or maybe CZ himself) responded to her that her statements were “not accurate,” but then she responded again, and it became more and more heated, almost like a “soap opera”... Can you tell us about that scene? Is it normal for politicians to get involved and respond to these kinds of things? What exactly happened? Teresa: First, Warren posted on social media that CZ was convicted, but in fact, CZ was not convicted. Then Warren accused CZ of doing improper things in obtaining or requesting a pardon, further adding criminal responsibility to him. These statements are also inaccurate. No matter who you are,you cannot just say someone committed a crime or accuse them of multiple crimes they didn’t commit without any evidence.Of course, government officials have some immunity in certain circumstances, but that immunity should be limited. I hope we can focus more on this, because the immunity these people enjoy is not what our founding fathers intended. This is a big issue, especially when politicians can profoundly affect people’s lives and livelihoods with their words—limiting immunity is particularly important. Pompliano: It feels like this is really a political issue. In terms of crypto regulation, we’ve seen all kinds of crackdowns in recent years, but now the new administration has taken a completely different attitude. This political nature is like a pendulum. Do you think we’ll continue to see this back-and-forth? Should people in the industry expect this volatility, or do you think once there’s a policy tailwind, it will be very difficult to swing back to a harsh crackdown? Teresa: Yes, I hope the pendulum doesn’t keep swinging like this. I think we can now drive some innovation in the U.S. to make things more stable.For example, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins wants all markets to be on-chain, and once they’re on-chain, it’s hard to move them off-chain again. We shouldn’t avoid or try to stop revolutionary technology—it’s something we need to embrace. This isn’t just limited to financial services; in all other application scenarios, once we make progress in this direction, it’s hard to go back to old technology. The Possibility of CZ Returning to Binance Pompliano: After CZ’s pardon, what changes have happened at Binance? Will he return to Binance? Is Binance making any business adjustments? I’m not sure how much you know, but what’s the current situation at Binance? Teresa:He will not return to Binance for now.Binance is still subject to all restrictions from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Treasury (FinCen), and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It’s crazy,most companies only deal with one or two government agencies, but Binance is facing five, and that’s in a situation where there’s no fraud, no victims, and no criminal record. Binance is still subject to oversight mechanisms. The Treasury, through FinCen, has arranged a monitor to ensure they comply with U.S. law—even though Binance has been excluded from the U.S. and has no U.S. customers, so there’s actually no need to comply with U.S. law. I’m glad that the accusations against CZ have basically been clarified now, but this has already caused damage to Binance and CZ. But I think, in fact, the biggest victim is the U.S.—Binance still hasn’t returned to the U.S. market, which means we’ve lost the liquidity of the world’s largest crypto exchange. To be the biggest market, you need the most liquidity. For example, users want more platform choices, and projects want to be listed on the biggest exchange, but now that exchange isn’t in the U.S., so some people choose to launch their projects outside the U.S. to get listed on Binance.
CZ's Personal Lawyer Responds to "Insider Look into Trump Money Power Pardon Deal"
Original Title: Why Did Trump Pardon Binance Founder CZ? Original Author: The Pomp Podcast Original Translation: Azuma, Odaily Star Daily The following is a text compilation of Teresa's interview, translated by Odaily Star Daily. Opening · Pompliano: Hello everyone, today we are going to have a very important and serious conversation. I have invited CZ's personal lawyer, Teresa Goody Guillén, who was deeply involved in the pardon process for CZ. I have seen a lot of controversy online about CZ's pardon, such as how he was released. Does this involve "quid pro quo"? Could it even be corruption? So I contacted Teresa, hoping to discuss face-to-face with her these questions that everyone is concerned about, whether they are simple details or sharp doubts. What is the Reason for the Pardon? · Pompliano: First, please tell us, what was CZ accused of? What is the reason for his pardon? Teresa: CZ was accused of Binance's failure to implement and maintain an anti-money laundering program, compliance system. It needs to be made clear that this is a regulatory violation, a compliance issue, but there was no money laundering involved, just that Binance did not implement an anti-money laundering plan. So, he was pardoned because he should not have been prosecuted in the first place. In the pardon statement, Trump also said that he does not believe CZ committed any crime and should not have been prosecuted. So, he was pardoned in the name of justice. CZ is the only one who has been prosecuted or imprisoned for this particular charge or similar nature (characterized by no fraud, no victims, no criminal record, etc.). The unfair treatment he received is very different from that of all others in history. · Pompliano: Why was he treated unfairly? Teresa: I believe this is part of the "Cryptocurrency War" initiated by the regulators. At that time, coinciding with the FTX collapse, they needed to take action against someone, they had to sue someone and persecute someone, and unfortunately, CZ became that person. · Pompliano: If I understand correctly, it's because the company did or did not do certain things that the regulatory agencies targeted them. Is it common for executives to bear personal responsibility for this? On the one hand, I can understand someone saying that the CEO should be held accountable for the company's actions; but on the other hand (I roughly searched on Google), large banks or other financial institutions have also been accused of similar things, but the executives themselves have not been implicated. What is the usual treatment and difference between the company and the executives in these cases? Teresa: Absolutely correct, executives are never sued for these kinds of things. You can name any large financial institution, and it likely has been accused of the same or even worse misconduct, but we have never seen any CEO being sued. This has never happened, and no other executive has been sued for these specific crimes; this is usually not how the justice system operates. Unveiling the Pardon Process · Pompliano: We now know that CZ did indeed receive a pardon, but I have many questions. I see many people speculating about the behind-the-scenes of the pardon... So how was the pardon actually achieved? Is there some form of "quid pro quo"? Is there any corruption involved? I hope you can help us first understand the process of obtaining a pardon, and then we can discuss various speculations within the community. Teresa: Okay. To obtain a pardon, you must first fill out an application and state the reasons for the application, then a series of people will review these materials and give their opinions. The Department of Justice, pardon lawyers, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, and the White House Counsel’s Office are all involved. So, before the pardon, there is a substantial amount of legal review that must take place, all of which must be on the application that is submitted. Therefore, this is a relatively standardized process. · Pompliano: Once you submit the application, who receives the application? Is there a specific Office of Pardon? Is there a designated person in charge? Is the application directly submitted to the President? The President couldn't possibly personally review hundreds or thousands of applications, so who is handling this process? Teresa: There can be many different ways to process a pardon application, depending on how the pardon application is transmitted, such as whether it is through a dedicated pardon attorney, or through the Department of Justice's website, or through other channels, ultimately to be reviewed by a reviewer. I know that different people submit pardon applications in different ways, but the President does not personally receive these applications, at least not in the cases I am aware of. · Pompliano: So, after the application is submitted, someone reviews it and provides recommendations to the President, such as whether this pardon should be considered. Is this a unilateral decision by the President? Or is there a process involving certain individuals (such as staff, administrators, the Department of Justice, etc.) making recommendations? Teresa: I am not sure about the specific internal operations of the White House, but certainly there are some people who need to sign off, the White House Legal Counsel's office needs to sign off, the pardon attorney needs to sign off. Of course, the ultimate decision lies with the President, and he must sign off personally. So, this is a collaborative effort involving different people, but I have not been involved in these specific discussions, so I cannot provide more details. Does Pardon Involve "Quid Pro Quo"? · Pompliano: There are many speculations surrounding CZ, Binance, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and Trump, I don't need to repeat all the speculations, you have definitely seen them... So, how would you refute the speculation of "quid pro quo (pay-for-pardon)"? How should people understand the relationship between business transactions and the pardon process? Teresa: Well... this is actually just a pile of misinformation. When you see those suspicions, have you seen any verified information? You may see some media reports quoting another media report, and then quoting another media report, but these contents have no real basis, only some so-called "sources close to someone," which usually point to an unreliable source. For example, the media always refers to World Liberty as Trump's company, but I have never seen any evidence. I saw Trump listed as an "honorary member" on their website, saw reports mentioning that certain Trump entities hold a minority stake in the company, but I have not seen any evidence to prove that this is Trump's company. Some people always take rumors as facts and use them as a basis for assumptions, but the reality is often different. The speculation of so-called "quid pro quo" is based on this premise, but these claims are simply not logical. For example, WLFI's stablecoin USD1 launching on BSC is an open and permissionless act, similar to me listing a product on an e-commerce platform, which does not imply any special relationship between me and the platform owner. This is the reality; assumptions hold no meaning, yet some people make judgments based on these assumptions, which is a clear misunderstanding of how business or blockchain operations function. There are also accusations regarding Binance, with some saying MGX invested USD1 in Binance, claiming it proves a connection between Binance and WLFI and suggests that Binance and CZ are "bribing" the president. This also reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how stablecoins operate and the business model. It's like if I buy wheat from you, you pay me in Swiss Francs, and suddenly I'm considered an investor in the Swiss Franc and accused of "bribing" Swiss politicians. It makes no sense, just like the current accusations. Therefore, these speculations are fundamentally misunderstandings. Many who realize how ridiculous these accusations are do not pay much attention to them. Still, those unfamiliar with the basic operating models continue to perpetuate these claims, causing them to spread further. This is the situation we are currently witnessing. · Pompliano: I know you are a very accomplished lawyer. I have always wanted to be a lawyer, although I may not be smart enough. Still, I'd like to "test" you a bit. Is USD1 only issued on BSC, or is it also issued on other chains? Teresa: You're very smart. Indeed, USD1 also exists on other chains. This is another key point; other exchanges also hold USD1, but no one goes around saying that other exchanges are also giving money to the president. Only Binance is facing these rumors and attacks. · Pompliano: Have CEOs of other cryptocurrency exchanges received pardons from the Trump administration? Teresa: I believe Arthur Hayes has also received a pardon, he is the CEO of BitMEX. By the way, the pardon mechanism has been in place since the founding of the United States, including during the British period, and covering both individuals and entities for civil and criminal offenses. So, pardons have existed for a long time; it's just that recently there has been more focus on criminal offenses and personal matters. Also, Ross Ulbricht from Silk Road received a pardon. · Pompliano: Let me go back to the critic's perspective. Some people may think that "there's no smoke without fire." So, is there a payment method where, for example, Trump has a secret Bitcoin wallet, and CZ or Binance has directly transferred money to him? Is there a possibility like this, or is it just a conspiracy theory? Teresa: I know CZ, so I know this would never happen. He is not that kind of person. I have some knowledge of the president; I don't know him, of course, I would love to know him, but I don't think this is something he would do. I also don't know if he has a Bitcoin wallet, and if he does, that would surprise me. If such a thing existed, we would have seen relevant reports long ago, and it would have been in a very verifiable and credible manner. This is also one of the beauties of distributed ledger technology—transparency. Since there isn't, it really means it never happened. CZ's Personal Approach · Pompliano: I have known CZ for many years. I've always thought he is a very calm, composed, and organized person. I interviewed him earlier this year, and he talked about coming from a village without electricity or running water but eventually becoming one of the richest people in the world. I can't imagine how challenging these experiences were. How does he deal with all of this? This is actually a very important yet often overlooked part of the whole thing—beyond law, politics, facts, and rumors, CZ is also a person; he has a family, emotional issues, how does he cope with all of this? Teresa: This is another highly impressive aspect of CZ. As his lawyer, my emotions fluctuate more than his because he is so calm and composed, handling everything with ease. I am an optimist myself, but his level of optimism is extraordinary. He always sees the bright side of things, and I admire that I don't know anyone who can handle things as calmly and composedly as he does, and he is always grateful for everything he has. I'm glad you brought up the topic of CZ's personal side because sometimes when I see people attacking him for certain things, like reading completely baseless reports, it really makes me angry. I believe valuing the humanity of each person is very important. When you attack or slander someone or try to prevent someone from getting forgiveness, remember that person also has a family, and you shouldn't treat them that way. Two-Tier Fluctuation of Regulatory Attitudes Seen from Politicians' Rhythmic Moves · Pompliano: I remember Elizabeth Warren (Note: Democratic Senator) had many criticisms of CZ, I remember you (or CZ himself) responded to her at one point saying "the comments were not accurate," but then she responded again, and it became more and more intense, almost like a soap opera... Can you tell us about this scenario? Is it normal for politicians to take action and respond to such things? What exactly happened? Teresa: First, Warren made a statement on social media saying CZ had been convicted, but in reality, CZ had not been convicted. Warren then accused CZ of inappropriate conduct in obtaining or seeking pardons, further adding to his criminal responsibility. These statements were also inaccurate. No matter who you are, you cannot casually say someone has committed a certain crime without any basis, or accuse them of multiple uncommitted crimes. Of course, government officials may have some immunity in certain situations, but this immunity should be limited. I hope we can focus more on this point because the immunity these people enjoy is not what our founding fathers hoped for. This is a significant issue, especially when politicians can profoundly impact people's lives and livelihoods through their words, limiting immunity becomes particularly important. · Pompliano: It feels like this is actually a political issue. Regarding cryptocurrency regulation, in the past few years, we have seen various crackdowns, but the new government now has taken a completely different stance. This political nature is like a pendulum swinging back and forth; do you think we will continue to see this back-and-forth? Should people in the industry expect this kind of fluctuation, or do you think once there is a regulatory tailwind, it will be very difficult to come back with a strong crackdown? Teresa: Yes, I hope the pendulum does not continue to swing back and forth like this. I believe that we can now drive some innovation in the United States to make everything more stable. For example, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins hopes to put all markets on the chain, and once they are on-chain, it will be challenging to move them off-chain again. We should not avoid or try to stop revolutionary technology; it is something we need to embrace. This is not limited to just the financial services sector; it is true for all other application scenarios as well. Once we make progress in this direction, it will be challenging to revert to past technologies. The Possibility of CZ's Return to Binance · Pompliano: After CZ's pardon, what changes have occurred at Binance? Will he return to Binance? Is Binance making any business adjustments? I'm not sure how much you know, but what is the current situation at Binance? Teresa: He will not return to Binance now. Binance is still facing restrictions from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Department of the Treasury (FinCen), and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It's just insane that most companies would only face accountability from one or two government agencies, but Binance is dealing with five, and this is without any fraud, victims, or criminal record. Binance is still under regulatory constraints. The Treasury Department has arranged for an overseer through FinCen to ensure they comply with U.S. laws—despite Binance being excluded from the U.S. and having no U.S. customers to serve in the first place. It's good that the accusations against CZ have now been mostly cleared up. Still, this whole situation has damaged both Binance and CZ. However, I believe the biggest loser is the United States, as Binance has yet to return to the U.S. market, resulting in the loss of liquidity from the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. To become the biggest market, you need the most liquidity—users want more platform choices, and projects want to list on the largest exchanges. But since this exchange is not in the U.S., some people are choosing to launch projects outside the U.S. to get listed on Binance.
MYX Finance Price Prediction 2025 – 2030: Can MYX Sustain Its Explosive Growth?
The Live Price Of MYX Is $ 2.50152079 With innovation in cross-chain derivatives and rising on-chain activity, MYX could reach $26 by 2025 and up to $50 by 2030 if momentum continues. MYX surged over 20,000% from June lows to September highs, making it one of the year’s best performers. MYX Finance (MYX) has emerged as one of 2025’s most remarkable tokens, by delivering parabolic gains in just a matter of months. From trading under $0.05 in June to reaching a new all-time high above $19 in September, MYX has quickly become one of the year’s top performers in the DeFi space. Advertisement This meteoric rise has raised the question in the community: Can MYX maintain its momentum, or is the token due for a much deeper correction? As its decentralized futures exchange is surging in activity by offering advanced cross-chain derivatives trading, MYX is positioning itself as a next-generation platform within decentralized finance. In this article, we’ll explore the fundamentals of MYX Finance, analyze recent market performance, and provide a detailed MYX price prediction 2025 to 2030. Cryptocurrency MYX Finance Token MYX Price $2.5015 14.80% Market Cap $ 553,099,813.55 24h Volume $ 74,466,403.6097 Circulating Supply 221,105,423.70 Total Supply 1,000,000,000.00 All-Time High $ 19.0135 on 11 September 2025 All-Time Low $ 0.0467 on 19 June 2025 MYX Finance is known as a decentralized futures exchange designed to make derivatives trading more accessible, efficient, and user-friendly to the people who want’s to trade. Unlike other traditional platforms, MYX incorporates a uniquely brought Chain-Abstracted Wallet that allows traders to move seamlessly across blockchains without manual bridging. Its simplicity has an innovative two-layer account model that ensures users maintain custody of funds while enabling gasless transactions through a relayer network. The another highlights that makes MYX more attractive is that this exchange supports leverage of up to 50x with zero slippage, powered by its matching pool mechanism. This enhances efficiency and reduces trading risks. As a reason why, in September, high-profile token listings happened, such as WLFI. This listing in particular have expanded the platform’s ecosystem and drawn more liquidity into the protocol. With the recent October crash, many are thinking MYX is done for, but it’s the exact opposite because the price action might not be supporting now due to macro factors, but fundamentals have never been better. As MYX Finance’s explosive growth is firmly rooted in robust on-chain fundamentals, moving beyond mere speculation. The platform has demonstrated consistent and significant expansion in user activity, evidenced by its surging monthly trading volume. This volume more than doubled during the year, climbing from $51 billion in January 2025 to $106.39 billion by the mid of october. Also, Earnings have more than doubled in the same period, jumping from $18 million to $46.432 million. Similarly, Total Value Locked (TVL) has seen explosive growth, climbing from $7.4 million at the start of the year to near $58 million by September. This trajectory demonstrates increasing trust and adoption, with new listings playing a significant role in accelerating growth. If this momentum continues, MYX Finance could regain its lost levels once it regains macro support. MYX Finance experienced a truly explosive second half of 2025. Following a multi-month period of consolidation, the token initiated its initial breakout in August, successfully establishing a foothold above the crucial $2 level. This momentum accelerated dramatically in September, driven by a sector-wide surge across exchange tokens. What followed was a near-parabolic rally that culminated in MYX setting a staggering all-time high (ATH) of $19.90 on September 11th, marking a historic period of price discovery. However, After the ATH, a sustained period of profit-taking saw MYX consolidate in a broad, yet heavily contested, range between $8 and $19. This period of distribution was violently settled in early October days especially on October 10th-11th when a catastrophic, market-wide liquidation cascade wiped out billions in leveraged long positions. This brutal shakeout decimated investor accounts and pushed the MYX token back to square one at $1.40. The over 90% decline from the top range effectively served to fill the entirety of the September price action gap, leading many to label the move as a major pump-and-dump cycle. Despite the seismic volatility, the bulls have since shown remarkable resilience, successfully reclaimed their position near $2.50 to $3 after the crash to $1.40, but then price action underwent a sideways range by mid-November. If the bleeding continues below $2, then the price crash to stretch in November seems inevitable despite the good adoption of its platform. At this level, a renewed demand could emerge, potentially indicating a rebound. In that case, before the year ends, the MYX price needs to reclaim $4.50 resistance, which would be the final target for the year-end. But demand rises similarly to September, then a recovery to $19 is still possible. However, if this aggressive demand doesn’t materialize, a slow recovery could occur, which might push the price towards $4.50 by year-end, followed by a complete recovery in the first half of 2026. October began with profit-taking, but it stopped at the $2 support area. Now, in November, it is consolidating and new bullish demand could ignite a fresh rally. Year Minimum Price Average Price Maximum Price 2025 $9.00 $15.00 $26.00 2026 $10.50 $18.00 $30.00 2027 $12.00 $24.50 $37.00 2028 $15.50 $29.00 $42.00 2029 $19.00 $35.00 $46.00 2030 $21.00 $38.00 $50.00 Looking beyond 2025, MYX Finance’s future will largely depend on whether it can sustain user growth, expand its ecosystem, and maintain competitive advantages in DeFi trading. As long as the platform continues to capture trading volume and revenues, MYX is well positioned to grow steadily. By 2026, MYX could stabilize within the $18-$30 range. In the following years, increasing institutional adoption of decentralized derivatives could push MYX toward higher valuations, potentially reaching $50 by 2030. This table provides a framework for understanding the potential MYX price movements. Yet, the actual price will depend on a combination of market dynamics, investor behavior, and external factors influencing the cryptocurrency landscape.
WLFI Breaks Out After 49 Days, Eyes 33% Rally Toward $0.25
Price Surge: WLFI climbed 33% after breaking a 49-day descending resistance trend. Technical Momentum: MACD and MFI indicators suggest strong buying pressure and bullish continuation. Shorts at Risk: Forced liquidations may increase as WLFI targets $0.25, adding upward pressure. World Liberty Financial — WLFI , is making headlines today, climbing over 33% in just 24 hours. The token reclaimed key resistance levels, fueled by strong trading momentum. After holding under pressure for 49 days, WLFI has finally broken out of a descending diagonal resistance. Traders and investors are now eyeing the next upside target near $0.25, raising hopes for a sustained rally in the coming sessions. $WLFI Structure Flip! The major $0.15 resistance zone is officially broken and confirmed as new support on the 4H chart. pic.twitter.com/u3Mr04KFXU — FOUR | Crypto Spaces (@X_Four_iv) November 10, 2025 Breakout Sparks Interest and Technical Reversa WLFI’s breakout confirms a technical reversal, signaling renewed bullish sentiment. The move pushed the token above resistance levels that had capped price action since late September. This new momentum opens the door for a potential rally toward $0.25, the upper boundary of its previous trading channel. A move to this level would mark WLFI’s highest trading point since September 22. However, a breakdown below the breakout line could push the token back toward support around $0.11. Traders are closely watching volume and momentum indicators to gauge whether buyers can maintain control. Technical indicators support the bullish case. The MACD recently formed a Golden Cross, with the blue line crossing above the orange signal line. This pattern suggests that buying momentum is returning, signaling potential for WLFI to regain a bullish trajectory. Meanwhile, the Money Flow Index — MFI , rose to 55.57, highlighting renewed investor interest. Increasing MFI readings suggest liquidity is moving into WLFI, strengthening the ongoing recovery. These indicators show that the token may have further upside potential if momentum continues. Shorts Face Pressure Amid Strong Buying The rally has put short traders under pressure, triggering forced liquidations in the derivatives market. Data from CoinGlass shows $3.45 million in short positions liquidated in past 24 hours. Further gains could escalate liquidation risks. For instance, a move to $0.168 could trigger another $2.46 million in forced liquidations, while reaching $0.184 could impact $3.91 million worth of contracts. These squeezes may amplify the buying pressure, further boosting WLFI’s rally. Investors should monitor key levels carefully. Maintaining gains above breakout resistance and volume support is essential for a sustained move toward $0.25. Short-term traders may capitalize on momentum, but higher-timeframe support levels will determine whether the rally holds. The combination of technical breakout, bullish MACD, rising MFI, and short liquidations paints a favorable picture for WLFI. If buyers maintain control, the altcoin could continue its impressive surge. However, traders should remain aware of potential pullbacks to the $0.11 support zone. WLFI surged 33% after breaking a 49-day resistance trend. The MACD and MFI indicate strong buying momentum. Short liquidations may amplify upward pressure toward $0.25. Traders should watch key support and resistance levels to gauge sustainability of the rally.
Sui Retraces 65%, WLFI Climbs 39%, and Apeing Emerges as the Must-Watch Next Big Crypto: Secure Your Whitelist Spot Now
The crypto world never waits, and neither do winners. Sui ($SUI), which once soared to $5.35, is now trading 65.45% below that peak, a reminder that missing a breakout can sting. Meanwhile, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has shown resilience, climbing 39% from last week’s $0.11 to $0.14 today. Points Cover In This Article: Toggle Apeing ($APEING): The Next Big Crypto You Can’t Afford to Miss Sui ($SUI): The Volatile Giant Making Investors Reflect World Liberty Financial (WLFI): Steady Growth and Strategic Entry Conclusion: Joining the Apeing Whitelist Is Critical For More Information: FAQ About the Next Big Crypto to Explode Why is Apeing considered the next big crypto to explode? How do I join the Apeing whitelist? What happens if I miss the whitelist? For traders and investors, the message is clear: markets move fast, and hesitation can cost you. Apeing ($APEING) offers an opportunity to capture the next big move in the crypto space. Its whitelist ensures early access, verified updates, and a front-row seat to what may become the most explosive crypto launch of the year. With major players like Sui showing massive volatility and World Liberty Financial carving steady growth, Apeing represents the balance between strategic entry and cultural momentum. If you missed previous breakout coins, this is your chance to position yourself ahead of the curve. Apeing ($APEING): The Next Big Crypto You Can’t Afford to Miss Apeing is not just another token; it is a movement. With its whitelist structure, community-driven momentum, and focus on early, verified participation, Apeing is poised to be the next big crypto to explode. The whitelist ensures that early adopters gain access before the public, protecting them from scams and positioning them ahead of the market. Missing past opportunities like Sui or other breakout coins can be painful, but Apeing gives investors a second chance. Timing, instinct, and decisive action are everything, and Apeing rewards all three. With the market constantly evolving, Apeing’s blend of speed, culture, and verification creates a unique opportunity. Early participants aren’t just buying a token; they’re claiming a seat at the forefront of the next crypto surge. The whitelist is structured, secure, and community-oriented, everything the best 100x crypto launches of the past have exemplified. Sui ($SUI): The Volatile Giant Making Investors Reflect Sui’s journey has been a rollercoaster. From an all-time high of $5.35 to its current trading level, over 65% below peak, the token has taught investors a lesson in patience and timing. Despite this, Sui remains 406.33% above its all-time low of $0.3648, demonstrating its resilience and long-term growth potential. Trading volume and community chatter suggest that Sui is still very much in play. Investors who entered late may feel regret, watching early adopters reap the rewards of the prior bull run. However, volatility creates opportunities, and those paying attention now could position themselves for future surges. The Sui case highlights the importance of acting fast. The market rewards decisiveness, and for those seeking the next big crypto, waiting too long can be costly. World Liberty Financial (WLFI): Steady Growth and Strategic Entry World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has emerged as a solid performer in the midst of a turbulent market. With its price up 39% from $0.11 last week to $0.14 today, WLFI is proving that calculated entry points and solid fundamentals can drive consistent gains. Traders looking for a blend of reliability and growth may find WLFI appealing. Its recent price movement signals both community interest and institutional attention. However, the market is shifting rapidly, and while WLFI continues to grow, the next breakout opportunity lies in projects that combine speed, culture, and verified early access, like Apeing. Missed previous surges in other tokens? WLFI reminds investors of the benefits of steady growth, but for the thrill and potential massive upside, Apeing offers the next big crypto to explode. Conclusion: Joining the Apeing Whitelist Is Critical In fast-moving markets, hesitation can be the difference between watching a breakout happen and actually participating in it. Apeing’s whitelist is designed to give proactive investors an edge. By signing up, you gain verified access, priority presale notifications, and early insight into the project’s developments. The Apeing whitelist isn’t just a registration; it’s a gathering of informed, motivated investors who understand that action beats hesitation. For More Information: Website: Visit the Official Apeing Website FAQ About the Next Big Crypto to Explode Why is Apeing considered the next big crypto to explode? Apeing combines community-driven energy, verified whitelist access, and strategic presale participation. Unlike tokens that rely solely on hype, Apeing rewards early, decisive action and provides a structured, audit-first environment. This combination makes it a strong contender in the next wave of crypto surges. How do I join the Apeing whitelist? Joining the whitelist is easy. Visit the official Apeing website, enter your email in the whitelist section, and confirm via the verification link sent to you. This guarantees early updates, verified participation, and priority presale access, crucial in a fast-moving market. What happens if I miss the whitelist? Missing the whitelist can result in losing early access to presale pricing and limited token allocations. While public sales may still be available, early participants gain a strategic advantage, positioning themselves ahead of the crowd.
WLFI Partners With AB To Deploy The USD1 Stablecoin On AB Chain
World Liberty Financial (WLFI) and AB Chain announced a collaboration under which USD1 has been deployed on AB Chain. Leveraging AB Chain’s high-performance network, USD1 delivers a faster and more convenient stablecoin experience for users. The partnership further enriches AB Chain’s DeFi and payments ecosystem, strengthening use cases across trading, lending, and liquidity. Meanwhile, the decentralized wallet AB Wallet aims to be the most user-friendly wallet for USD1 with zero-fee transfers, near-instant settlement, and full compatibility with all chains where USD1 is available. Looking ahead, AB Wallet is exploring USD1 yield and other value-added services. The launch of USD1 marks an important step forward in AB Chain’s stablecoin infrastructure. About AB Chain The AB Blockchain Network (AB Chain) is a heterogenous, next-generation, modular, and scalable blockchain ecosystem designed to power a wide range of applications including stablecoins and payments. Anchored by the AB Core mainnet and supported by multiple industry-specific sidechains, the network enables seamless integration for use cases spanning IoT, payments, gaming, and finance. At the heart of the ecosystem is the AB Wallet, a secure, user-friendly, all-in-one platform for trading and digital asset management. Offering non-custodial control, the wallet empowers users with true ownership of their assets through self-managed private keys. Designed for speed and simplicity, AB Wallet delivers a secure, decentralized, and lightning-fast trading experience without reliance on third parties while also supporting multi-chain, multi-wallet, and multi-account functionality. With AB Chain’s integrated on-chain and community data, users can easily discover new opportunities, access decentralized applications, and enjoy seamless service integration, all within a single, intuitive platform. About World Liberty Financial World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is a DeFi protocol and cryptocurrency company founded in 2024. Built on blockchain technology, the company develops digital assets and financial tools designed to expand global access to decentralized finance. WLFI launched its first token, $WLFI, in late 2024 and introduced USD1, a dollar-pegged stablecoin, in March 2025. USD1 is backed by U.S. treasuries, dollars, and other cash equivalents, and serves as the foundation for WLFI’s growing ecosystem of DeFi products. World Liberty Financial is majority-owned by entities associated with the Trump family such as President Donald Trump and his sons Donald Trump Jr., Baron Trump, and Eric Trump. At its core, World Liberty Financial is focused on bridging the gap between traditional finance and the open economy via purpose-built, on-chain products. The company positions itself as a gateway for traders and investors to participate in DeFi, combining blockchain innovation with mainstream financial accessibility.
WLFI partners with AB to officially deploy the USD1 stablecoin on the AB public blockchain
November 12, 2025—World Liberty Financial (WLFI) and AB Public Chain announced a partnership, and USD1 has officially been deployed on the AB Public Chain. Leveraging the high-performance network of the AB Public Chain, USD1 brings users a faster and more convenient stablecoin usage experience on-chain. This partnership will further enrich the DeFi and payment ecosystem of the AB Public Chain, injecting stronger stablecoin infrastructure capabilities into applications such as trading, lending, and liquidity. At the same time, the AB decentralized wallet, AB Wallet, is also committed to creating the most user-friendly USD1 wallet: supporting 0 fees, instant transactions, and full compatibility with the various chains where USD1 resides. In the future, it will also consider launching value-added services such as USD1 wealth management. The launch of USD1 signifies an important step for the AB Public Chain in stablecoin infrastructure development.
WLFI brings USD1 to AB Chain amid growing DeFi ambitions
WLFI expands the reach of its USD1 stablecoin by deploying it on AB Chain, an integration aimed at leveraging the network’s high throughput for faster settlements and deeper DeFi liquidity. Summary WLFI deployed its USD1 stablecoin on AB Chain to enhance settlement speed and DeFi liquidity. USD1, launched in March, is fully backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars and government money market funds. According to a press release dated Nov. 13, the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial has technically deployed its USD1 stablecoin on the AB Chain. This integration, developed in collaboration with the AB Chain team, enables users to transact with the dollar-pegged asset utilizing AB’s underlying architecture. The partnership also deepens the integration, with the native AB Wallet planning to support zero-fee USD1 transfers and exploring future yield-generating services tied to the stablecoin. WLFI broadens USD1 stablecoin footprint WLFI first launched USD1 in March of this year, initially supporting only Ethereum and BNB Chain. The stablecoin, which is backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars and government money market funds and features monthly attestation reports, has since grown to a market capitalization of $2.81 billion . Its availability on major exchanges like Binance and Bybit, alongside decentralized protocols such as Uniswap and PancakeSwap, has been central to its adoption strategy. Notably, WLFI’s aggressive growth trajectory has accelerated significantly in recent weeks. Just days before the AB Chain announcement, the Trump-backed digital asset venture integrated USD1 into the StableStocks ecosystem, enabling users to trade nearly 200 tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs directly with the stablecoin. Prior to that, the company unveiled a points program on the Dolomite protocol, incentivizing users to supply USD1 in a bid to boost its DeFi utility. This operational build-out extends to its legal team, with the late October hiring of Mack McCain, a former Robinhood and Charles Schwab legal executive, as its new General Counsel. However, WLFI’s swift ascent has been complicated by serious allegations from prominent investors. The platform is currently facing backlash for allegedly freezing investor funds. Ethereum developer Bruno Skvorc publicly alleged that his tokens were locked after his wallet was labeled “high risk,” a situation he described as “theft” and a “mafia-style” setup. The controversy escalated when Tron founder Justin Sun revealed that his $75 million stake in WLFI was also frozen, calling the action “unreasonable” and a contradiction of blockchain’s core principles. Blockchain analyst ZachXBT suggested that automated compliance systems, triggered by past interactions with platforms like Tornado Cash, may be responsible for the lock-ups.
World Liberty Financial (WLFI) To Soar Higher? Key Breakout Retest Signals Potential Upside Move
Date: Wed, Nov 12, 2025 | 05:44 AM GMT The cryptocurrency market is witnessing notable volatility today as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) trade slightly in the red, adding mild pressure across several altcoins. Despite this, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is holding firm and showing early resilience. WLFI is trading in the green with an impressive weekly jump of 29%. More importantly, its latest chart structure suggests that a larger bullish move may be developing, driven by a classic breakout-and-retest pattern. Source: Coinmarketcap Descending Broadening Wedge Retest As highlighted in the 4-hour chart, WLFI spent several weeks consolidating inside a descending broadening wedge — a bullish reversal formation that often signals the end of a prolonged correction phase. After steadily compressing within this structure, WLFI broke out above the wedge’s descending resistance line near $0.1492, marking the first strong technical shift in momentum since early Q4. This breakout move pushed the price toward a local high of $0.1633, where short-term profit-taking briefly slowed the advance. WLFI 4H Chart/Coinsprobe (Source: Tradingview) The pullback that followed turned out to be a textbook breakout retest. WLFI dipped back to retest the broken resistance — now acting as support — around $0.1497, held firm, and bounced strongly. This bounce confirms that bulls are defending the breakout zone and maintaining control of the trend. At the time of writing, WLFI trades near $0.1554, suggesting renewed accumulation interest around current levels. What’s Next for WLFI? If WLFI continues to respect its bullish breakout structure, the next resistance to watch is $0.1633, the previous local high. A strong reclaim above this zone would signal continuation of the uptrend, with potential for the price to advance toward the measured target of $0.1917 — derived from the wedge’s height projection. This would represent an estimated 23% potential upside from current prices if the bullish pattern fully plays out. Conversely, if the token fails to sustain above the breakout trendline, it could invalidate the pattern in the short term, leading to a temporary cooling-off period before any larger move resumes.
CZ Denies Involvement in $5M Hyperliquid Wallet Chaos, But The Crypto Crowd Is Still Skeptical
The crypto world is buzzing after a mysterious whale drained $5 million from Hyperliquid’s liquidity pool, sparking chaos and accusations. The finger pointed squarely at Chapeng Zhao, better known as CZ, founder and former CEO of Binance. Stay ahead in the crypto world – follow us on X for the latest updates, insights, and trends!🚀 But the billionaire denies any connection to the wallet behind the attack, insisting he’s been off the centralized exchange grid for eight years. Conspiracy theories Hyperliquid’s drama started when a whale stirred the pot, not with random liquidation, but seemingly with a targeted stress test or outright attack designed to shake Hyperliquid’s liquidity system. He denies everything. lol. Look no further than his last week's interview. He denied no business dealing with WLFI even after a clear business deal in place with WFLI on USD1. Denying the truth is no big deal for this dude. — TZ (@techzealx) November 12, 2025 The community, never short on drama, immediately zeroed in on CZ, but he responded with a classic internet clapback. “Glad to know I live rent free in your head […] but I have not used any other CEX for 8 years.” But CZ’s denial hasn’t quelled the conspiracy theories. Some insist he could have handed the reins to an accomplice. One pointed out a previous interview where CZ denied no business dealings with WLFI despite evidence of a partnership. Denying the truth is no big deal for this dude, they quipped. Market share Last month, the exchange faced $10 billion in liquidations during a selloff, though still trailing Binance’s gargantuan volume. Hyperliquid’s liquidity woes stretched liquidation periods and exposed fragile order books designed for fast perpetual trading on its Layer 1 chain. Binance continues to dominate spot volumes, leaving Hyperliquid’s market share below 10%, despite steady growth. kripto.NEWS 💥 The fastest crypto news aggregator 200+ crypto updates daily. Multilingual & instant. Visit Site Clash of the titans? As indutry observers highlighted, CZ is gearing up for a high-profile debate with gold bug economist Peter Schiff. Set for December 4 during Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai, the clash promises a no-holds-barred showdown between Bitcoin’s digital might and tokenized gold’s traditional sheen. It all started on X when CZ mocked Schiff’s tokenized gold idea as a “trust me bro” scheme reliant on third parties. Schiff fired back, challenging CZ to a verbal joust, which CZ eagerly accepted. Prepare the popcorn, guys! Written by András Mészáros Cryptocurrency and Web3 expert, founder of Kriptoworld LinkedIn | X (Twitter) | More articles With years of experience covering the blockchain space, András delivers insightful reporting on DeFi, tokenization, altcoins, and crypto regulations shaping the digital economy.
What has the Trump family been up to recently?
Deng Tong, Jinse Finance Recently, the Trump family has once again become a "traffic star," from suing The New York Times, claiming $230 million from the Department of Justice, to the $300 million White House banquet hall renovation project, Trump's eldest son's $500,000 private club membership fee, and Truth Social's plan to launch a social media prediction market platform with Crypto.com... Regardless of external criticism, the Trump family continues to do things their own way, and this reality show starring America's First Family is still playing out brilliantly. 1. Trump Sues The New York Times On October 16, Trump once again filed a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and several reporters, accusing the media outlet of attempting to undermine his 2024 campaign and tarnish his business reputation. Previously, a federal judge dismissed his initial lawsuit for being lengthy and rambling. The revised complaint, submitted Thursday night, was shortened to 40 pages, less than half the length of the original. Michael S. Schmidt, a New York Times reporter listed as a defendant in the original complaint, has been removed from the defendant list. Also deleted were numerous lengthy praises of Trump, such as calling his 2024 election victory "the greatest personal and political achievement in American history." Consistent with the initial complaint, the revised version still seeks $15 billion in damages. 2. Trump Claims $230 Million from the Department of Justice On October 21, The New York Times reported that Trump has asked the U.S. Department of Justice to pay up to $230 million in compensation for criminal investigations he faced before and after his first White House term. Trump stated that any decision by the Department of Justice to pay compensation "must be approved by me, and it's really strange for me to decide how much to pay myself." "In other words, have you ever had to decide how much to compensate yourself?" "I have indeed suffered great damage, and any compensation I receive will be donated to charity." A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said: "President Trump continues to fight all Democrat-led political persecution, including the 'Russiagate' hoax, and the unconstitutional and anti-American weaponization of our judicial system by Biden and his handlers." In addition to confronting the Department of Justice, several companies have also reached settlements with Trump, as listed below: Meta: $25 million On January 29, 2025, The Wall Street Journal noted: Meta will pay $25 million to settle the 2021 Trump lawsuit. After the U.S. Capitol was attacked, the social media platform suspended Trump's account. Of this, $22 million will go toward the construction of the Trump Presidential Library, with the remainder used to pay legal fees and compensate other plaintiffs. Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren pointed out: "This looks like a bribe and sends a signal to all companies: corruption is the name of the game." Last November, Trump mentioned the lawsuit. One insider said the president hinted that the lawsuit had to be resolved before Zuckerberg was "brought into the fold." X: $10 million On February 12, 2025, CBS revealed: Social media platform X will pay President Trump $10 million to settle a lawsuit arising from his account being suspended for nearly two years after the Capitol riot. In July 2021, Trump sued Twitter, claiming the ban violated his First Amendment right to free speech. In November 2022, about a month after Musk acquired Twitter, Trump's account was reinstated. Paramount: $16 million On July 2, 2025, Paramount Pictures announced it would pay $16 million to settle with Trump, with the money going toward the construction of Trump's future presidential library. Trump had accused the show of deceptively editing an interview with Harris on the "60 Minutes" news program, attempting to "tip the scales toward the Democrats." Democratic Senator Ron Wyden said: "Paramount Pictures bribed Trump to get merger approval... State prosecutors should have these executives who sold out our democracy in court today." YouTube: $24.5 million On September 29, 2025, YouTube agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle with Trump. In 2021, shortly after the Capitol riot, Trump's account was banned. Although YouTube did not have to admit fault, at Trump's request, it must donate $22 million to the nonprofit "National Mall Trust Fund" to fund the construction of the White House banquet hall. Another $2.5 million will go to Trump's supporter groups, including the American Conservative Union and writer Naomi Wolf. The above four companies have reached settlements totaling $75.5 million with Trump. If the lawsuit with the Department of Justice is settled, the total settlement amount may exceed $300 million. 3. $300 Million White House Banquet Hall Renovation Project On October 24, according to The Verge, Trump is demolishing the East Wing of the White House to make room for a lavish banquet hall. Trump said the $300 million cost would not be borne by taxpayers but by private donors, including himself. The donor list includes some of America's largest tech companies, such as Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft. Among them, Google's YouTube has agreed to pay more than $20 million to the project. Companies in the cryptocurrency sector have also been generous: Ripple, Tether America, Coinbase, and the Winklevoss brothers (Cameron and Tyler are listed separately) have all contributed donations. In addition, defense and telecom giants such as Lockheed Martin, Comcast, T-Mobile, and Palantir are also on the list. 4. Truth Social to Launch Social Media Prediction Market Platform with Crypto.com On October 28, Bloomberg reported: Trump Media & Technology Group plans to offer prediction contracts on its Truth Social platform, allowing users to bet on events ranging from political elections to changes in inflation rates. The program, called "Truth Prediction," will use Crypto.com Derivatives North America for prediction betting and will allow betting on commodity prices and events for all major sports leagues. Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek has established a good relationship with Trump and his businesses. He was one of the first crypto industry executives to visit Mar-a-Lago after Trump's victory last year, and Crypto.com also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration committee. Its parent company later donated $10 million to Trump's super PAC, MAGA Inc. Trump Media CEO and former Republican Representative Devin Nunes said in a statement: "For a long time, global elites have tightly controlled these markets—through Truth Prediction, we are democratizing information and empowering ordinary Americans to use the wisdom of the crowd to turn free speech into actionable foresight." If fully launched, Truth Social will become the first social media platform to natively integrate a prediction market. This move expands Trump Media's business from social media to financial products, allowing users to turn their opinions into bets and view real-time market-based odds changes. Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek said the collaboration aims to combine social interaction with financial prediction, bringing prediction market trading to a broader audience. 5. Trump's Eldest Son's $500,000 Private Club Membership Trump's eldest son's club, called "Executive Branch," held a launch party on Saturday night attended by at least six members of President Trump's administration, as well as wealthy CEOs, tech founders, and policy experts. Executive Branch was co-founded this April by Donald Trump Jr., Omid Malik and Christopher Buskirk of 1789 Capital. Other founding members include White House crypto czar David Sacks, crypto investors Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, and tech investor Chamath Palihapitiya. The club only accepts membership applications by founder recommendation and strict screening. In addition to the $500,000 membership fee, the club will also charge an annual fee, the specific amount of which has not yet been announced. The role of "Executive Branch" in Washington's social and political circles may be similar to that of the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., during Trump's first administration. The Trump Hotel was once a popular gathering place for government officials, Republican congressional leaders, foreign dignitaries, lobbyists, and business leaders. Prospective members must undergo strict review and approval by the founders, and even though some are willing to pay $1 million to join, membership still requires recommendation and strict screening. Someone close to the club said: "We don't want media members or a large number of lobbyists to join. We want people to be able to have private conversations comfortably." 6. Other Remarks by Trump 1. Cryptocurrency May Solve the $35 Trillion U.S. Debt Problem On October 23, Trump said in a private meeting that cryptocurrency has a "great future" and hinted that the U.S. might use cryptocurrency to solve its $35 trillion debt problem. According to leaked video, Trump said: "I would write on a little piece of paper: $35 trillion in cryptocurrency, we have no debt, that's what I like to do." Notably, this is not the first time Trump has hinted at using digital assets to eliminate the ever-growing U.S. debt; he has repeatedly stated publicly that bitcoin could be used to "save America." 2. Trump Appoints Mike Selig to Lead the CFTC On October 26, Mike Selig posted on X: "I am honored to be nominated by President Trump to serve as the 16th Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Under the President's leadership, America's financial markets will usher in a great golden age and abundant new opportunities. I pledge to do my utmost to promote the healthy functioning of commodity markets, foster freedom, competition, and innovation, and assist the President in making the U.S. the global center for cryptocurrency." White House head of cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence David Sacks said the appointment was an excellent choice. "On behalf of the President's Digital Assets Working Group, Patrick Witt and I look forward to continuing to work with Mike to fulfill President Trump's promise—to make the U.S. the global center for cryptocurrency." 3. U.S. Stocks Perform Well On October 29, Trump said that Nvidia (NVDA.O) stock hit a new high and the stock market reached a record high yesterday. He noted that all markets are performing well, with almost every market continuing to rise. 4. The Federal Reserve Should Cut Rates Quickly Trump continued to criticize the Federal Reserve, once again targeting Fed Chairman Powell for being slow to cut rates. In a speech in South Korea, Trump referred to "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell" and said he would not let the Fed raise rates out of fear of inflation three years from now. He expects the U.S. economy to achieve 4% growth in the first quarter of 2026, far higher than economists' forecasts. This statement highlights the tense relationship between Trump and the Federal Reserve. Conclusion Since Trump's return to the presidency, his family's ties with cryptocurrency have deepened, continuously binding family business with the public eye. According to an investigation by the Financial Times, Trump and his family earned over $1 billion in pre-tax profits from cryptocurrency businesses in the past year. The investigation shows that the Trump family's crypto empire includes multiple projects such as digital trading cards, meme coins, stablecoins, tokens, and decentralized finance platforms. Among them, TRUMP and MELANIA meme coins generated about $427 million in sales and trading fee income. The World Liberty Financial platform earned $550 million in revenue from selling WLFI governance tokens, and USD1 stablecoin sales reached $2.71 billion. It is evident that cryptocurrency has become an important tool for the Trump family to accumulate wealth. Since Trump's return to the White House, he has appointed pro-crypto individuals to key positions to formulate a series of regulations favorable to family wealth accumulation. Trump uses political power to harvest business wealth and then uses business wealth to support political activities. "Trump" is no longer just a name, but a trump card for the family's power to cross from business into politics. During Trump's term, the "First Family" reality show series may continue to play out.
$RAVE Unveils Tokenomics, Igniting the Decentralized Cultural Engine Powering Global Entertainment
Source: RAVE Every cultural movement begins with a rhythm — a pulse that transcends individuals and unites them in collective motion. In the 90s, this rhythm flowed between warehouses and dance floors; today, it navigates through the realm of the web and code. The only constant is the human instinct to connect. RaveDAO exists for this very connection. What started as a series of live events from Singapore and Dubai to Seoul, Miami, Hong Kong, Brussels, Bangkok, and Amsterdam has gradually evolved into a global network uniting entertainment with infrastructure. Through a system that merges cultural experiences with on-chain participation, RaveDAO brings together artists, event organizers, and fans. Today, with the launch of $RAVE, this network has its own economic ecosystem. $RAVE serves as the coordinating layer connecting every branch, event, and creator in the entire ecosystem. It drives governance, incentives, and real-world activities such as payments, transforming culture itself into a runnable protocol. Token Distribution The 1 billion total supply of $RAVE tokens forms the foundation of RaveDAO's cultural economy. The distribution structure is designed to support long-term sustainability, reward genuine participation, and ensure that growth benefits the entire community. · Community (30%): Empowers local chapters, ecosystem builders, and loyal fans through governance grants, incentives, and rewards to drive global community growth. · Ecosystem (31%): Allocated for brand and ecosystem partnerships, partner events, technical infrastructure development, driving global user adoption, and on-chain experience mainstreaming. · Initial Airdrop (3%): Distributed to users and contributors who have participated in RaveDAO events. · Foundation / Impact Fund (6%): Serves as a long-term reserve for philanthropic projects (such as Rave for Light) and other impact initiatives governed by the DAO. · Team and Collaborators (20%): Intended to incentivize the core founding team, key contributors, strategic advisors, and long-term partners to drive ecosystem growth. · Early Supporters (5%): Rewarding early supporters and partners who believed in and supported the movement. · Liquidity (5%): Designated to provide ample liquidity on major exchanges to ensure seamless participant entry and trading experience. Token Release Schedule During the TGE, approximately 23.03% of the total token supply will enter circulation, primarily for ecosystem expansion, initial airdrops, and liquidity arrangements. The remaining tokens will follow a "12-month lockup + 36-month linear release" schedule, gradually unlocking over time. This progressive release structure helps maintain market stability and aligns incentives with long-term participation and growth. The specific release rules for each category are as follows: · Community (30%): 12-month lockup, 36-month linear release · Ecosystem (31%): 15.03% unlocked at TGE, remaining 15.97% locked for 12 months and then linear release · Initial Airdrop (3%): 100% unlocked at TGE · Foundation / Impact Fund (6%): 12-month lockup, 36-month linear release · Team and Collaborators (20%): 12-month lockup, 36-month linear release · Early Supporters (5%): 12-month lockup, 36-month linear release · Liquidity (5%): 100% at TGE Token Utility $RAVE is designed for participation, allowing every participant to co-build, co-create, and co-own within their beloved culture. Its functionality is structured around three core layers: B2B, B2C, and DAO governance. B2B: IP, Licensing, and Staking · Stake-to-License Mechanism: Event organizers obtain authorization to use RaveDAO IP by staking $RAVE to operate events that meet global standards. · Local Chapter Activation: Launch new "Road to RaveDAO" cities and chapters through a funding proposal approved by the DAO. · Partner Accreditation: Production, beverage, and experiential service partners are required to stake $RAVE to obtain certification. · Artist and Label Collaboration: Artists can stake $RAVE to co-release digital collectibles, licensing rights, or Web3 collaboration with the RaveDAO brand. B2C: Experience and Interaction · Exclusive Benefits: Stake $RAVE to unlock VIP tiers, artist meet-and-greet opportunities, and priority event ticketing. · Digital Collectibles: Participate in limited-edition artist collaborations or NFT releases. · Payment Functionality: Use $RAVE to pay for event tickets, VIP packages, and on-site purchases at flagship events and local chapters. · Community Incentives: Earn $RAVE rewards through content creation, event referrals, offline interactions, and other activities. DAO Governance: Community Decision-Making · Voting Rights: Decide on event locations, artist lineups, venue selections, and charitable fund allocations. Chapter Proposal: Submit and vote on launching new "Road to RaveDAO" chapters and initiatives. · Ecosystem Funding: Provide financial support to artists, community builders, and collaborative projects. Value Accrual and Deflationary Mechanism RaveDAO's ecosystem continuously injects intrinsic value into $RAVE through real-world utility and ongoing reinvestment. · IP Expansion Flywheel: Every music festival, every chapter event, every collaboration, is reinforcing token demand and cultural influence. · Event Revenue Loop: Ticketing, NFTs, sponsorships, and other offline and on-chain revenue streams continuously drive token circulation. · Buyback and Burn Mechanism: Some event profits are used for buyback and permanent burning of $RAVE. · Stake-to-Earn Mechanism: Organizers, artists, and partners can earn rewards, discounts, or other benefits through staking. Ultimately, what $RAVE is building is a long-term economic system driven by real-world events and cultural diffusion, rather than short-term speculative gains. The Future of $RAVE $RAVE is more than just a token; it represents a sense of belonging and the power of co-creation. It provides the community with tools to collaboratively create, share value, and reinvest influence back into society. From flagship music festivals with thousands of attendees to city chapter events supporting local emerging talent, each use of $RAVE strengthens the entire network. Expanding from Asia to Europe and the Americas, $RAVE will serve as a medium to connect people, empower culture, and foster the mutual growth of creativity and value. By 2027, RaveDAO plans to establish 50+ decentralized local chapters, reaching over 300,000 participants annually, and donate a portion of each event's proceeds to charity projects including the Tilganga Eye Center in Nepal and Nalanda West in Seattle. $RAVE is not just a token; it is a testament to everything that can be created when music, technology, and humanity resonate together—a rhythm that continues after the music fades. Let's all go to $RAVE together and experience this never-ending beat. About RaveDAO RaveDAO is a global community that fuses music, technology, and purpose. Since the sold-out inaugural event in Dubai in 2024, it has rapidly expanded to Europe, the Middle East, North America, and Asia, creating world-class experiences worldwide, attracting over 100,000 participants, with single-event attendance consistently exceeding 3,000. RaveDAO has collaborated with top artists such as Vintage Culture, Don Diablo, Chris Avantgarde, Lilly Palmer, MORTEN, Bassjackers, and GENESI, and has received support from partners such as WLFI, Binance, OKX, Bybit, Bitget, and Polygon; they are reshaping the offline entertainment experience with Web3 thinking and maintaining deep partnerships with 1001Tracklists, AMF, Warner Music, and others. Going beyond the dance floor, RaveDAO is also transforming energy into long-term impact. In just 2025 alone, its event proceeds have helped over 400 cataract patients in Nepal regain their sight and have funded over 150 meditation classes and mind-healing projects across the United States.
WLFI and TRUMP Prices Surge Amid Political Buzz—Can the Rally Last?
Story Highlights The crypto market is once again captivated by politically themed tokens as World Liberty Financial (WLFI) and OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) record explosive price gains. WLFI price jumped over 35% in the past 24 hours, while TRUMP price spiked nearly 30%, with trading volumes crossing $1 billion combined. The rally comes amid renewed political attention, rising social media mentions, and speculative flows ahead of a busy U.S. macro week. While these memecoins are enjoying unprecedented momentum, analysts warn that such rallies can fade as quickly as they form—making risk management crucial for traders chasing this narrative. World Liberty Financial (WLFI) price has emerged as the week’s most talked-about token, riding a wave of political and retail speculation. Priced near $0.15, WLFI saw trading volume soar more than 800% within a day. Much of the enthusiasm stems from its association with Trump-linked branding and the perception of upcoming policy-friendly shifts in the U.S. economy. However, analysts note that whale concentration remains high, and several reports of wallet blacklisting have raised concerns about centralisation risks. Technically, WLFI has broken past short-term resistance near $0.18, turning it into support. If momentum continues, the next target lies around $0.25–$0.28, though profit-taking could trigger sharp retracements given its rapid, sentiment-driven rise. As seen in the above chart, the WLFI price spiked heavily and pierced through the pivotal resistance at $0.133 and $0.152. The token has reached the pivotal resistance zone between $0.163 and $0.167, but only a breakout from this zone could validate a bullish reversal. The Stochastic RSI has reached the overbought zone, and hence, a small pullback could be on the horizon. In such a case, the area around $0.15 may act as a strong support and trigger a rebound to $0.18 and later to $0.2. The TRUMP price is experiencing a powerful revival, climbing above $10.70 amid soaring market enthusiasm. The surge follows increased media coverage of Trump-related political events and renewed speculation surrounding potential crypto policy discussions. Trading activity on decentralized exchanges has spiked, making TRUMP one of the most active political memecoins in the market. From a technical standpoint, the token is approaching a breakout zone between $11.50 and $12.00, which could open room toward $15.00 if volume sustains. However, traders should remain cautious: the token’s historical rallies have been followed by 20–40% pullbacks within days. For now, sentiment and volatility—not fundamentals—are driving price direction. As seen in the above chart, the TRUMP price has broken above the descending trend line with a strong intent. With this, the pattern formed is a rising parallel channel, indicating the beginning of a fresh ascending trend. The RSI and CMF are both incremental, supporting the bullish thesis, and hence the price may continue to rise. The RSI has not entered the overbought range since inception, and if it does now, it could revive a strong upswing, securing levels above $10. The twin rallies in WLFI and TRUMP highlight how narrative-driven speculation continues to dominate portions of the crypto market. With macro optimism rising and political cycles fueling trader enthusiasm, these tokens have become short-term beneficiaries of attention-based liquidity. However, long-term sustainability will depend on whether either project delivers tangible progress beyond branding. As the week unfolds, WLFI and TRUMP will remain key volatility plays in a politically charged crypto landscape.
WLFI token price rises as the US Senate passes deal to end government shutdown
WLFI token price jumps 33% after Senate advances shutdown-ending deal. Political optimism and Trump ties fuel a strong WLFI trading surge. WLFI token volatility rises as House vote and market reactions loom. The WLFI token price has surged dramatically as the US Senate passed a procedural deal aimed at ending the historic 40-day US government shutdown, sending ripples through the cryptocurrency market. Following the passage of the deal, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a politically-linked DeFi project backed by the Trump family, saw its native token climb over 33% in a single day, reflecting both political optimism and heightened speculative interest. Political developments drive WLFI price The surge in WLFI price started immediately after the Senate approved a bipartisan agreement to fund the government, a key procedural first step following weeks of legislative deadlock. This vote represents the most significant progress toward ending the shutdown, which began on October 1, 2025, leaving approximately 1.4 million federal employees on unpaid leave and halting essential services, including SNAP benefits for millions of low-income Americans. Although the deal now moves to the House of Representatives, where additional approvals are required, the procedural success removed immediate macroeconomic uncertainty and sparked a broad risk-on environment across financial markets. Historically, political narratives have been particularly influential in driving World Liberty Financial (WLFI) gains. Besides the procedural deal, President Trump’s comments on potential $2,000 “tariffs dividends” and his pro-crypto stance have provided additional momentum for the token. WLFI token price analysis The WLFI token price recently cleared critical resistance levels, including its 30-day simple moving average and key Fibonacci retracement points, signalling renewed buying strength. The trading volume has spiked by over 600% in 24 hours, indicating heightened participation from both retail and institutional investors. In addition, futures open interest has jumped significantly, reflecting aggressive long positions and a speculative appetite that contributed to volatility. Despite brief dips caused by large holder activity, such as the recent Jump Crypto’s transfer of 18.42 million WLFI to Binance , the overall trend remained sharply upward, with the token establishing higher lows that suggest sustained buying interest. WLFI token price outlook Looking ahead, WLFI token price is likely to remain reactive to news surrounding the US government shutdown and subsequent House of Representatives approvals. While the Senate’s vote marked an important procedural step, additional hurdles remain before federal employees are fully restored to pay and government services resume. Political developments, including potential policy updates on healthcare subsidies and tariff dividends, will continue to influence the token’s performance. Rumours regarding potential involvement of key figures like Binance founder Changpeng Zhao in the World Liberty Financial (WLFI) ecosystem have also fueled speculation and trading activity, adding layers of momentum to the WLFI token price action. Investors should also monitor large-holder transactions and derivatives activity, which could amplify volatility.
Bitcoin Opens CME Gap at $104K–$105K Range
Bitcoin forms a CME gap at the $104K–$105K level. Gaps like these often signal a potential price retest. Market watchers anticipate possible movement toward the gap zone. A CME gap occurs when the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Bitcoin futures market opens at a different price than where it previously closed, often due to weekend trading on crypto spot markets. These gaps are closely watched by traders because Bitcoin tends to “fill” them by revisiting those price levels in the future. Recently, Bitcoin opened a significant CME gap between $104,000 and $105,000, signaling a possible future retracement toward that zone. While gaps don’t guarantee a price movement, they’ve proven historically to be influential indicators. Why This Gap Matters The newly formed CME gap at such a high level comes as Bitcoin continues its bullish momentum. Analysts view this gap as a technical magnet, suggesting that price could return to fill it—especially during periods of low volatility or after sharp rallies. Gaps at elevated price levels can also indicate strong institutional interest. With the gap at $104K–$105K, it implies some institutional traders may have projected bullish targets beyond current market prices, which is significant for long-term outlooks. ⚠️ALERT: BITCOIN OPENS A CME GAP IN THE $104K–$105K! Watch closely for a potential retest.👀 pic.twitter.com/Sd7XwE054H — Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) November 10, 2025 What Traders Should Watch For Investors and traders alike should monitor Bitcoin’s price action closely in the coming weeks. A potential retest of the $104K–$105K CME gap may offer an entry or exit point, depending on market momentum. Watch for: Volume spikes near support/resistance zones. Breakouts or rejections around key levels. Macro indicators and BTC ETF flows influencing direction. Although nothing is guaranteed in crypto, understanding the significance of CME gaps can offer useful insights, especially for those looking to plan trades or anticipate price action. Read Also : Older Bitcoin Wallets Shift Coins to Binance at Record Pace UK Plans £20K Stablecoin Cap for Individuals Crypto Market Bounce Sparks Weekend Recovery Jump Crypto Moves $2.9M Worth of WLFI to Binance Institutions May Be Re-Entering Ethereum Market
Institutions May Be Re-Entering Ethereum Market
Rising spot order sizes hint at institutional interest. Ethereum is holding strong between $3K and $3.4K. A low-volatility accumulation phase could be underway. Recent data on Ethereum spot order sizes is pointing toward a potential return of institutional investors to the Ethereum market . Analysts have observed a notable increase in the average order size on exchanges, a common sign that larger players are stepping back in. This pattern of behavior often precedes significant price movements or accumulation phases, where large investors begin building positions slowly to avoid spiking volatility. The increase in larger buy orders suggests growing confidence in Ethereum’s current valuation levels. $3K–$3.4K: A Key Support Zone Technical analysts are closely watching the $3,000 to $3,400 range. This price region appears to be acting as a strong structural support for Ethereum. If this zone continues to hold, it could provide the foundation for a broader upward trend. A consistent bounce from this range, combined with rising spot order sizes, supports the theory that Ethereum is entering an accumulation phase. Historically, these quiet, low-volatility periods have preceded strong bullish trends in the crypto market . Spot Order Size Data Hints at Institutional Re-Entry Into Ethereum Market “If this behaviour persists and the $3-$3.4K region holds as structural support, Ethereum may be entering a low-volatility accumulation zone.” – By @ShayanBTC7 pic.twitter.com/O60J3NmIdS — CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) November 10, 2025 Accumulation Zone Could Set Stage for Next Rally Market watchers believe that Ethereum may be transitioning into a low-volatility accumulation zone. This is typically a period when smart money—like institutional investors—steadily accumulates an asset without drawing too much attention. Such phases are essential in crypto cycles, as they lay the groundwork for larger upward moves. With the broader market stabilizing and Ethereum maintaining support, a breakout could follow if accumulation continues. Read Also : Older Bitcoin Wallets Shift Coins to Binance at Record Pace UK Plans £20K Stablecoin Cap for Individuals Crypto Market Bounce Sparks Weekend Recovery Jump Crypto Moves $2.9M Worth of WLFI to Binance Institutions May Be Re-Entering Ethereum Market
UK Plans £20K Stablecoin Cap for Individuals
BOE suggests a £20K cap on individual stablecoin wallets. Businesses could face a £10M holding limit. The move aims to reduce financial risk and protect consumers. The Bank of England (BOE) has proposed new limits on how much stablecoin individuals and businesses can hold. Under the draft regulation , individuals would be restricted to a maximum of £20,000 in stablecoins, while businesses would face a cap of £10 million. These proposals are part of the UK government’s broader plan to regulate digital assets and protect the financial system from potential risks posed by digital currencies. Why the BOE is Capping Stablecoin Holdings The BOE is concerned that widespread use of stablecoins could impact the stability of traditional banks and monetary policy. If people move too much money into stablecoins, it might weaken the role of commercial banks in lending and disrupt the financial ecosystem. By introducing these caps, regulators hope to strike a balance—encouraging innovation while ensuring financial safety and resilience. 🇬🇧 JUST IN: The UK’s BOE proposes a £20K cap on individual stablecoin holdings and £10M for businesses. pic.twitter.com/85JXOrs5X5 — Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) November 10, 2025 Impact on the Crypto Industry The proposed caps could significantly shape how stablecoin firms operate in the UK. For individual users, the £20K limit may seem reasonable, but businesses handling large-scale transactions might face operational challenges under the £10 million ceiling. Still, this move sends a clear message: the UK is taking a cautious yet open approach to digital currencies. The government is expected to hold further consultations before the rules are finalized, giving crypto stakeholders a chance to weigh in. Read Also : Older Bitcoin Wallets Shift Coins to Binance at Record Pace UK Plans £20K Stablecoin Cap for Individuals Crypto Market Bounce Sparks Weekend Recovery Jump Crypto Moves $2.9M Worth of WLFI to Binance Institutions May Be Re-Entering Ethereum Market
November 10th Market Key Insights, How Much Did You Miss?
Featured News 1. US Government's Shutdown Comes to an End, but Serious Disagreements Within the Democratic Party Over the "Compromise Bill" 2. Some Privacy Sector Tokens See Significant Price Surges, with DCR Spiking Nearly 40% in a Single Day 3. STRK Breaks $0.2 Mark, Surging Over 45% in 24 Hours 4. WLFI Experiences a 30% Price Surge, With Nearly $3 Million Worth of Short Positions Liquidated in Less Than 1 Hour Across the Network 5. "Binance Life" Market Cap Briefly Exceeds $200 Million, with a 25% Price Increase in 24 Hours Featured Articles 1. "US Government Set to Reopen, Is Bitcoin Finally Going to Surge?" The longest government shutdown in history is finally coming to an end. The government collectively shut down due to a budget impasse, a phenomenon almost unique to the U.S. political system. The 40-day shutdown had a significant impact on the global financial markets. Nasdaq, Bitcoin, tech stocks, Nikkei index, and even safe-haven assets like U.S. bonds and gold were not spared. 2. "After Zero Commission Fees, the Battlefield Shifts: The New Brokerage Firms Are Those Capturing the Talent in the "Discovery and Discussion Layer"" From the retail trading frenzy sparked by GameStop to Robinhood's vision of a "financial super app," social trading is evolving from a fringe phenomenon to part of the financial infrastructure. These platforms do not replace brokerages but build a new layer of discovery and discussion on top of them. This article delves into how emerging platforms like Blossom, AfterHour, and Fomo are reshaping retail investors' behavior path and market structure through real holding data, community interaction, and trade integration. As this infrastructure gradually takes shape, those who understand their users will define the future of financial access. On-chain Data On-chain Fund Flow for the week of November 10
Filled orders
Delivery scenarios