INIT -35.87% in 24 Hours Amid Sharp Short-Term Volatility
- INIT token plummeted 35.87% in 24 hours after a 222.22% 7-day surge, marking extreme short-term volatility. - Market sentiment shifts, liquidity changes, and macroeconomic factors triggered the sharp price reversal. - Technical indicators showed overbought conditions and bearish moving average divergence before the crash. - A backtesting strategy aims to exploit INIT's volatility by targeting overbought/oversold thresholds systematically.
On AUG 30 2025, INIT dropped by 35.87% within 24 hours to reach $0.352, following a dramatic 222.22% surge over the preceding 7 days. Over a 30-day period, the token fell by 1731.84%, marking one of the most volatile short-term movements in recent memory. Despite the sharp near-term correction, INIT has still gained 7020% over the past year, underscoring long-term bullish momentum against a backdrop of significant short-term turbulence.
The recent price movement was triggered by a sudden shift in market sentiment, with traders reacting to a combination of on-chain liquidity changes and broader macroeconomic factors. The token’s sharp 24-hour decline came after a brief but intense rally that saw it nearly triple in value over seven days. However, this rapid ascent failed to sustain momentum, leading to a swift reversal and a return toward prior levels of support. The 30-day drawdown further highlights the token’s sensitivity to both speculative positioning and macroeconomic headwinds, with capital flows shifting rapidly in response to market conditions.
Technical indicators painted a mixed picture as the recent swing unfolded. While the token’s long-term trend remains intact, as evidenced by the 7020% annual increase, short-term oscillators signaled overbought conditions prior to the correction. Moving averages showed signs of divergence in the days leading up to the 24-hour drop, with the 50-period line crossing below the 200-period line as a bearish signal. This structural shift in the short-term trend has led to increased caution among traders and analysts alike, many of whom are monitoring key support levels for signs of stabilization.
Backtest Hypothesis
The potential for a structured trading approach to capture some of the volatility in INIT’s short-term price action has led to the development of a backtesting strategy aimed at modeling the token’s price swings. The strategy is designed to isolate sharp movements like the 222.22% weekly increase and subsequent 35.87% decline, using predefined thresholds to trigger entry and exit points. By identifying and acting on overbought and oversold conditions, the backtest seeks to simulate a systematic approach to riding the token’s volatility while managing risk exposure.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Brevis receives collective praise from the Ethereum community—Is ZK finally becoming practical?
Brevis has achieved proof for 99.6% of Ethereum blocks within 12 seconds, with an average of only 6.9 seconds, using just 64 RTX 5090 GPUs.
From SDK to "Zero-Code" DEX Building: Orderly's Three-Year Masterpiece
Orderly ONE proves that sticking to one thing and doing it to the extreme is the right approach.
The Ethereum community collectively gives a thumbs up: Has ZK technology finally moved from the lab to production-grade tools?
Brevis has achieved proof for 99.6% of Ethereum blocks within 12 seconds, with an average time of only 6.9 seconds, using just 64 RTX 5090 GPUs.
When the market complains about CZ, people begin to miss SBF
SBF interview: The bankruptcy lawyers won, the creditors received full repayment, and the one who could have made them even richer is now waiting for the day when the world recognizes the truth.
