A whale address increased its holdings of 3,278 ETH at an average price of US$3,050, holding a total of more than 86,000 ETH
According to ChainCatcher news, according to on-chain analyst Ember monitoring, 40 minutes ago, the giant whale that has been continuously withdrawing ETH and stablecoins from Binance spent 10 million USDT on the chain to buy 3,278 ETH, with an average price of $3,050.
It is reported that the whale has continued to withdraw ETH and stable coins from Binance since April 1. So far, it has withdrawn a total of 69,388 ETH and 265.8 million stable coins from Binance; on April 14, it used 70 million USDC to buy on the chain. 23,790 ETH was received (but 10,000 of them were sold a dozen hours later, making a profit of US$1.15 million).
Currently, the whale holds 86,457 ETH (approximately $262 million), with an average price of $3,170; and 217 million stablecoins.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.
