Survey finds gaps in mainstream Bitcoin coverage, leaving institutional investors exposed
A second-quarter survey of 18 mainstream news outlets logged 1,116 Bitcoin (BTC) stories and measured sentiment at 31% positive, 41% neutral, and 28% negative, according to Bitcoin analysis firm Perception.
The data reveal a significant gap between finance-focused media that cover the market extensively and legacy publications that rarely address it.
Sparse coverage
Perception counted two Bitcoin articles in The Wall Street Journal, 11 in the Financial Times, and 11 in The New York Times. These totals trailed every finance-oriented title in the sample and even lagged mid-tier general outlets.
Audiences that rely on these newspapers for market intelligence received almost no information on an asset that outperformed broad indexes again in the quarter. The report referred to this mismatch as an “editorial blind-spot risk” because institutional investors may base their portfolio decisions on incomplete information.
High-volume business channels drove the most constructive coverage. Forbes produced 194 Bitcoin stories with a positive-to-negative ratio of roughly 1.8:1. At the same time, CNBC published 141 items at 2.5:1; and Fortune filed 117 pieces that leaned modestly positive.
These outlets focused on adoption metrics, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), treasury allocations, and mining economics, presenting Bitcoin as a viable macro asset rather than a novelty.
Negative framing clustered elsewhere. The Independent ran 45 stories with a 2.3:1 negative tilt, while Fox News and Barron’s delivered smaller volumes but similar skepticism, focusing on crime, cybersecurity breaches, and price volatility.
Perception grouped coverage into three narrative blocs: enthusiastic adoption (Forbes, CNBC), willful minimalism (WSJ, FT, NYT), and persistent skepticism led by traditional general interest outlets.
Information asymmetry
According to the report, the divergence matters because large-cap digital assets now trade with liquidity comparable to some G-10 currencies, and exchange-listed spot ETFs cleared record volumes during the quarter.
Asset managers that monitor only the low-volume publications may miss regulatory developments, fund flow data, and corporate treasury moves that the high-volume cohort documents in near real-time.
The report concluded that the coverage split creates both risk and opportunity: risk for institutions that depend on undersupplied channels and opportunity for readers who follow the outlets that closely track market mechanics.
With sentiment and story counts quantifiable every quarter, portfolio teams can benchmark media exposure against price action and adjust their information sources accordingly.
Survey finds gaps in mainstream Bitcoin coverage, leaving institutional investors exposed appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
$8.8 billion outflow countdown: MSTR is becoming the abandoned child of global index funds
The final result will be revealed on January 15, 2026, and the market has already started to vote with its feet.

Deconstructing DAT: Beyond mNAV, How to Identify "Real vs. Fake HODLing"?
There is only one iron rule for investing in DAT: ignore premium bubbles and only invest in those with a genuine flywheel of continuously increasing "crypto per share."

Empowered by AI Avatars, How Does TwinX Create Immersive Interaction and a Value Closed Loop?
1. **Challenges in the Creator Economy**: Web2 content platforms suffer from issues such as opaque algorithms, non-transparent distribution, unclear commission rates, and high costs for fan migration, making it difficult for creators to control their own data and earnings. 2. **Integration of AI and Web3**: The development of AI technology, especially AI Avatar technology, combined with Web3's exploration of the creator economy, offers new solutions aimed at breaking the control of centralized platforms and reconstructing content production and value distribution. 3. **Positioning of the TwinX Platform**: TwinX is an AI-driven Web3 short video social platform that aims to reconstruct content, interaction, and value distribution through AI avatars, immersive interactions, and a decentralized value system, enabling creators to own their data and income. 4. **Core Features of TwinX**: These include AI avatar technology, which allows creators to generate a learnable, configurable, and sustainably operable "second persona", as well as a closed-loop commercialization pathway that integrates content creation, interaction, and monetization. 5. **Web3 Characteristics**: TwinX embodies the assetization and co-governance features of Web3. It utilizes blockchain to confirm and record interactive behaviors, turning user activities into traceable assets, and enables participants to engage in platform governance through tokens, thus integrating the creator economy with community governance.

Aster CEO explains in detail the vision of Aster privacy L1 chain, reshaping the decentralized trading experience
Aster is set to launch a privacy-focused Layer 1 (L1) public chain, along with detailed plans for token empowerment, global market expansion, and liquidity strategies.

