SEC’s Liquid Staking Guidance Sparks Regulatory Debate
- Amanda Fischer likens SEC guidance to practices before 2008.
- Criticism and support among regulators for liquid staking.
- Potential impact on major liquid staking protocols.
Amanda Fischer, former SEC Chief of Staff, criticized the SEC’s recent guidance on liquid staking via X (Twitter), comparing it to actions leading to the 2008 financial crisis.
Her comments highlight potential regulatory gaps in crypto, sparking debate among industry leaders and raising concerns about financial stability.
Amanda Fischer’s Criticism of the SEC
Amanda Fischer’s criticism of the SEC’s new guidance on liquid staking has generated significant discussion. She warned it enables financial instability similar to the 2008 collapse. This comparison has stirred debate across regulatory and crypto communities.
Fischer, who served as the Chief of Staff to SEC Chair Gary Gensler, expressed these concerns publicly on X (formerly Twitter). The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance clarified that some liquid staking receipt tokens are not considered securities under federal law.
“The SEC’s latest crypto giveaway is to bless the same type of rehypothecation that cratered Lehman Brothers — only in crypto it’s worse because you can do it without any SEC or Fed oversight.” — Amanda Fischer, Former Chief of Staff, SEC
Impact on Crypto Platforms
Certain crypto platforms like Lido, managing over $31.8 billion in deposits, are heavily affected. However, the guidance appears to relieve compliance risks, possibly maintaining or increasing total value locked (TVL) in these platforms. The guidance has elicited mixed reactions. Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw opposed it for lack of clarity, while Hester Peirce praised it as innovative . This illustrates differing views within the SEC regarding crypto market regulation.
Future Developments
The SEC’s guidance might embolden liquid staking providers like Lido and Rocket Pool, promoting further development. However, future financial vulnerabilities are highlighted by Fischer’s warnings about unregulated rehypothecation resembling past financial crises. Industry experts continue to observe regulatory impacts on cryptocurrencies including Ethereum, stETH, and rETH. Past events, like the 2008 crisis, offer a cautionary backdrop as liquid staking evolves without direct regulatory oversight.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
British pound confuses investors as rally grow more erratic
Share link:In this post: The pound has risen 7.2% against the dollar but fallen 4.3% against the euro in 2025. Trump’s “reciprocal” tariff deal gave the U.K. an edge, but inflation and politics hurt confidence. Analysts expect rates to stay unchanged, and markets are split on where the pound is heading.

OpenAI targets Indian market with first New Delhi office
Share link:In this post: OpenAI is opening its first India office in New Delhi later this year, reinforcing its expansion into one of its fastest-growing markets. ChatGPT Go, the company’s cheapest plan yet at ₹399 ($4.57), was launched exclusively for India. OpenAI faces legal and competitive pressures in India, with local publishers accusing it of unauthorized content use.

Federal Reserve's most important speech of the year, high probability of rate cut in September

Metaplanet Increases Bitcoin Holdings to 18,888 BTC

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








