Is Aave on the Verge of Cracking Under Its Own DeFi Power?
Aave’s dominant position in DeFi comes with growing risks, including centralized governance, a shift towards larger users, and over-expansion. Any disruption in Aave could have serious implications for the entire DeFi market.
Aave (AAVE), a leading non-custodial liquidity protocol, has established itself as a major player in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, controlling approximately half of the DeFi lending market share.
However, as the crypto market remains euphoric amid the broader bull run in 2025, several concerns within Aave emerge that could have severe consequences for the overall market.
The Risks Behind Aave’s DeFi Dominance and Market Control
According to data from DefiLama, Aave’s Total Value Locked (TVL) stands at $36.73 billion. This accounts for nearly 50% of the total $75.98 billion TVL. Furthermore, the protocol’s TVL reached an all-time high of $40 billion last week.
This dominant position makes Aave the ‘backbone’ of decentralized credit systems, enabling users to borrow and lend assets without intermediaries. Nonetheless, this central role also means that if Aave faces issues, it could trigger a ripple effect throughout the entire market.
But what could go wrong? One critical concern is the concentration of influence within the protocol’s governance.
Previously, Sandeep Nailwal, Founder and CEO of Polygon Foundation, expressed concerns about the governance structure within Aave. He highlighted that the protocol is governed by one individual (Stani Kulechov, the founder).
Nailwal noted that Kulechov has significant control over proposals and voting, effectively running the platform based on personal preferences.
“He also threatens the remaining voters to vote as per his proposals (whom i spoke personally after after Polygon proposal). This is when he already has a HUGE delegated voting power,” he wrote.
The user base composition further amplifies Aave’s vulnerabilities. Data from Kaiko Research indicated a shift in 2025, with large users holding collateral exceeding $100,000, rising from 29% in 2023 to 37%. Meanwhile, small users with deposits under $1,000 declined from 15% to 12% over the past two years.
“Users with over $100k in collateral grew from 29% in 2023 to 37% in early 2025, with the $100k–$1m collateral group rising to 26% and the $1m+ group to 11%, each up about four points. Over time, growth in large depositors has mostly come at the expense of smaller ones with $1k–$10k deposits,” Kaiko noted.

This concentration of power among high-net-worth participants heightens the potential for liquidity shocks and protocol instability. Should these users withdraw en masse or face liquidation events, the impact could reverberate across interconnected DeFi platforms.
Lastly, overexpansion also poses a significant risk. Aave’s deployment across 16 chains has strained operational resources. Defi Ignas, a prominent analyst, stressed on X that some of these expansions operate at a loss, increasing financial and technical risks.
“We reached an L2 saturation point: Aave deployed on 16 chains, but the new deployments are operating at a loss (Soneium, Celo, Linea, zkSync, Scroll),” the post read.
The implications of these risks extend beyond Aave itself. As one of DeFi’s most dominant players, any disruption, whether stemming from governance failures, user concentration, or over-expansion, could erode trust in decentralized lending and destabilize the broader ecosystem. Thus, addressing these challenges will be critical for Aave.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Blockchain-Driven GDP Reporting: A New Era for Economic Forecasting and Fintech Innovation
- U.S. Department of Commerce plans to publish GDP data on blockchain, leveraging its tamper-proof, decentralized architecture to enhance transparency and data integrity. - Blockchain-enabled real-time GDP reporting reduces data lag and noise, enabling dynamic forecasting models and faster policy responses compared to traditional delayed reports. - The initiative creates investment opportunities for fintech firms (e.g., IBM, Snowflake) and MLaaS providers (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud) in blockchain infrastruct

AI Agent Platforms: The Next Frontier in Search Disruption and Recall's Strategic Edge
- Recall.ai disrupts traditional search by transforming real-time meeting data into contextual intelligence via its "Meeting Bots as a Service" platform. - The API-first model enables enterprises to integrate AI-driven transcription, sentiment analysis, and interactive features like Output Media for automated workflows. - With $10M ARR and 300+ enterprise clients, Recall's usage-based pricing and vertical-specific solutions position it as a scalable AI infrastructure leader in the $12B transcription market

Solana's $300 Target Amid Volatility and Emerging BlockDAG Competition: A Contrarian Play on High-Growth Crypto Assets
- Solana (SOL) faces a critical juncture in 2025 amid volatility, with a $195.99 price and 24.80% annual gain despite regulatory risks and BlockDAG's 15,000 TPS challenge. - Institutional adoption ($1.72B invested by 13 firms) and upcoming Firedancer upgrades aim to boost scalability, while a potential 2025 ETF approval could drive SOL toward a $300 target. - BlockDAG's $385M presale and 2,900% early returns highlight disruption risks, but Solana's 4,500+ developers and 65,000 TPS edge maintain its DeFi/NF

Meta's Political Playbook in AI Regulation: Reshaping Tech's Competitive Landscape and Investment Horizons
- Meta's 2025 political strategy leverages super PACs and lobbying to weaken AI regulations, targeting California bills like SB 53 and SB 942. - The company's $64-72B AI infrastructure spending and NVIDIA partnerships drive 50% revenue growth for hardware suppliers. - Google and Microsoft pursue similar deregulatory goals but emphasize ESG commitments, creating sector-wide sustainability gaps. - Federal investigations and state transparency laws pose risks, while infrastructure investments position Meta to

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








