Note: Alpha Token is not yet listed for trading or other services on the Bitget exchange. Bitget Wallet supports on-chain transactions for cryptocurrencies across multiple blockchains. You can sell Alpha Token via Bitget Wallet.
24-hour A buy/sell ratio
Buy 40%
Sell 60%
Data updates may be slightly delayed and are for reference purposes only.
Where and how to sell Alpha Token via a crypto wallet
Investing in Alpha Token has never been easier. This is a widely adopted method to sell Alpha Token. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to sell Alpha Token on Bitget Wallet.
Step 1: Download Bitget Wallet
Eyeing a token not yet listed on Bitget? Here's a step-by-step guide on how you can buy Alpha Token on Bitget Wallet. Simply download the Bitget Wallet Chrome extension on your PC, or get the Bitget Wallet app on Google Play or the Apple Store!
Step 2: Create a Alpha Token wallet
Already installed Bitget Wallet? Jump right in and select "Create a Wallet" to get started.
Click "Wallet" on the homepage and select a mainnet that supports A from the list in the upper right corner. You have successfully created a Web3 wallet for A!
Step 3: Swap Alpha Token in your crypto wallet
If you already have A in your crypto wallet (such as Bitget Wallet), you can easily swap them for other tokens (such as USDT or BTC) on the DEX trading platform within Bitget Wallet.
Step 4: Withdrawing P2P available tokens from your crypto wallet to Bitget
If you already have tokens (i.e. USDT, BTC) available on the Bitget P2P trading platform in your wallet, you can easily deposit these assets into your Bitget account.
Go to the Deposit page, and select the coin and the blockchain network (e.g., ERC20, TRC20, BTC, BEP20).
After selecting your preferred coin and network, an address and a QR code will be generated. You can use either one of these methods to initiate the deposit.
Ensure the blockchain network you select matches the withdrawal platform, as using the incorrect network can result in the irreversible loss of assets.
Proceed with transferring your crypto from your external wallet by confirming the withdrawal details and sending it to your Bitget account address.
Deposits require a certain number of confirmations on the network before they appear in your account.
Step 5: Place an order for Alpha Token on P2P Market
Make P2P trades with 0 fees: With exchange.bitget_P2P, you can sell crypto using over 100 payment methods, including bank transfer, cash, and e-wallets like Payeer, Zelle, Perfect Money, Advcash, and Wise. Simply place an order, pay the buyer, and receive your fiat currency.
How to withdraw Alpha Token with Bitget's hassle-free withdrawal process
Using an exchange is one of the most convenient ways to cash out your Alpha Token or other cryptocurrencies, and Bitget stands out as an excellent choice. With its intuitive Buy/Sell buttons, Bitget simplifies the process, allowing you to easily select the cryptocurrency you want to sell and specify the amount.
When it comes to withdrawing the Alpha Token you've acquired, Bitget offers a seamless experience. Enjoy competitive fees, a flexible minimum withdrawal threshold, and lightning-fast processing within 24 hours, ensuring your funds are readily available.
People sell Alpha Token for various reasons, including:
1. Profit-taking: When the price of Alpha Token rises significantly, investors may sell the asset to realize their profits.
2. Diversification: Some investors may sell Alpha Token to diversify their portfolios and invest in other assets.
3. Financial needs: People may sell Alpha Token to cover expenses or meet other financial obligations.
4. Risk aversion: Some investors may be concerned about the volatility of Alpha Token and sell to reduce their exposure to risk.
5. Market sentiment: Negative news or events related to Alpha Token can lead to a price decline, prompting investors to sell.
It's important to note that buying or selling Alpha Token can be risky, as prices can fluctuate significantly. Investors should carefully assess their financial goals and risk tolerance before making any decisions.
What are the fees for selling crypto with Bitget P2P markets?
Bitget P2P currently charges zero fees. All merchants can post ads without any fees to help lower costs. If Bitget P2P introduces transaction fees for makers on completed orders in the future, an official announcement will be made.
*Please note that some payment method service providers may charge extra transaction fees.
As a crypto P2P seller, how am I protected?
If you're selling, never release the assets before confirming that you've received funds from the buyer. Please note that certain payment methods that buyers use are not instant and may face chargeback risks.
Cryptocurrency investment activities, including selling Alpha Token online via Bitget, are subject to market risk. Bitget provides easy and convenient ways for you to sell Alpha Token instantly, and we strive to fully inform our users about each cryptocurrency we offer on our exchange. However, we are not responsible for any outcomes arising from your Alpha Token sale. This page, and the information within it, is not intended to be an endorsement of any specific cryptocurrency or acquisition method.
An undoubted game changer As the crypto sector marches firmly toward greater adoption, projects like Mixin are laying out a viable path forward, one which prioritizes privacy and security from the ground up. In the long run, privacy may indeed prove to be the ultimate moat in crypto, offering something that raw throughput or flashy features cannot (ala peace of mind and protection in an increasingly interconnected financial world). In all of this, platforms that are able to recognize this and execute on it, as Mixin has, can position themselves perfectly to capture the next wave of users and transactions that demand confidentiality by default. Therefore, in a space often obsessed with openness, it’s the guardians of privacy that could quietly end up owning most of crypto.","createTime":"1769593560422","detailId":"4370106","id":"4370106","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769593533000","originUrl":"https://blockchainreporter.net/why-the-future-of-crypto-belongs-to-privacy-first-platforms/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":25,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769593533000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"BlockchainReporter","title":"Why the Future of Crypto Belongs to Privacy-First Platforms","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n \n
\n
Agora CEO Nick van Eck anticipates a surge in stablecoin usage for business transactions, with Agora’s AUSD at the forefront, as reported in early 2026.
\n
This expansion could streamline enterprise payments, potentially altering business finance dynamics and enhancing stablecoin stability.
\n
Agora’s CEO on Stablecoin Usage
\n
Agora’s CEO, Nick van Eck, predicts a rise in stablecoin usage within enterprise payments. This shift by Agora, initially a decentralized finance-focused company, aligns with van Eck’s vision for payroll and business transactions.
\n
\n
\n
Nick van Eck, the founder of Agora, emphasizes the role of stablecoins in businesses, specifically highlighting AUSD. The company’s total value locked has increased by 60% following recent decentralized finance launches.
\n
\n “Our focus is shifting from DeFi to enterprise applications, enhancing payroll and B2B payments.” — Nick van Eck, CEO and Founder, Agora \n
\n
Enterprise Applications and Impact on Businesses
\n
The drive towards enterprise applications may prompt significant changes for businesses relying on traditional currency. Industries may soon integrate stablecoins into payroll and B2B payments, underscoring a shift in financial operations.
\n
Financial influence is clear as Agora experiences growth. This alteration in financial transactions could additionally encourage scrutiny from regulatory bodies, seeking to balance innovation and compliance.
\n
Stablecoins in Market Adaptation
\n
Enterprises incorporating stablecoins may adapt more efficiently to market needs. This transformation might enhance competitive edges for businesses ready to implement new financial technologies.
\n
Analyzing historical patterns suggests that stablecoin adoption could spur technological advancements. By examining data and trends, experts foresee potential economic shifts, marking significant progress in digital currency integration across sectors.
\n
","contentId":"12560605169974","contentText":"Agora CEO Nick van Eck anticipates a surge in stablecoin usage for business transactions, with Agora’s AUSD at the forefront, as reported in early 2026. This expansion could streamline enterprise payments, potentially altering business finance dynamics and enhancing stablecoin stability. Agora’s CEO on Stablecoin Usage Agora’s CEO, Nick van Eck, predicts a rise in stablecoin usage within enterprise payments. This shift by Agora, initially a decentralized finance-focused company, aligns with van Eck’s vision for payroll and business transactions. Nick van Eck, the founder of Agora, emphasizes the role of stablecoins in businesses, specifically highlighting AUSD. The company’s total value locked has increased by 60% following recent decentralized finance launches. “Our focus is shifting from DeFi to enterprise applications, enhancing payroll and B2B payments.” — Nick van Eck, CEO and Founder, Agora Enterprise Applications and Impact on Businesses The drive towards enterprise applications may prompt significant changes for businesses relying on traditional currency. Industries may soon integrate stablecoins into payroll and B2B payments, underscoring a shift in financial operations. Financial influence is clear as Agora experiences growth. This alteration in financial transactions could additionally encourage scrutiny from regulatory bodies, seeking to balance innovation and compliance. Stablecoins in Market Adaptation Enterprises incorporating stablecoins may adapt more efficiently to market needs. This transformation might enhance competitive edges for businesses ready to implement new financial technologies. Analyzing historical patterns suggests that stablecoin adoption could spur technological advancements. By examining data and trends, experts foresee potential economic shifts, marking significant progress in digital currency integration across sectors.","createTime":"1769513220300","detailId":"4356362","id":"4356362","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769512889000","originUrl":"https://tokentopnews.com/agora-ceo-nick-van-eck-stablecoin-surge/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":10,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"DEFI,A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769512889000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/74d5bb6c793e3b6277f4108f12de5d121769512889150.png","sourceName":"TokenTopNews","title":"Agora CEO Nick van Eck forecasts stablecoin rise, focusing on enterprise applications and AUSD growth.","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Provident Financial Services Set to Announce Earnings
\n
Provident Financial Services (NYSE:PFS), a regional banking institution, is scheduled to release its latest financial results this Tuesday after the markets close. Here’s a summary of what to watch for.
\n\n
Recent Performance Overview
\n
In the previous quarter, Provident Financial Services slightly surpassed Wall Street’s revenue projections, posting $221.7 million in revenue—a 5.3% increase compared to the same period last year. While the company managed to edge past analysts’ tangible book value per share forecasts, its earnings per share matched expectations, resulting in a mixed performance overall.
\n\n
Outlook for the Upcoming Quarter
\n
For the current quarter, analysts anticipate that Provident Financial Services will generate $223.5 million in revenue, reflecting an 8.6% year-over-year increase. This growth rate is notably slower than the 79.4% surge seen in the corresponding quarter a year ago. Adjusted earnings per share are projected to reach $0.56.
\n\n
Provident Financial Services Total Revenue
\n\n
Analyst Sentiment and Historical Trends
\n
Over the past month, most analysts have maintained their forecasts for the company, indicating expectations for steady performance as earnings approach. Notably, Provident Financial Services has fallen short of revenue estimates on two occasions in the last two years.
\n\n
Peer Comparisons in Regional Banking
\n
Several competitors in the regional banking sector have already shared their fourth-quarter results, offering some context for Provident’s upcoming report. ServisFirst Bancshares achieved a 20.7% year-over-year revenue increase, exceeding analyst expectations by 5%. Dime Community Bancshares also outperformed, with revenue rising 24.5% and beating estimates by 5.2%. Following these announcements, ServisFirst Bancshares’ stock climbed 14.6%, while Dime Community Bancshares saw a 12.5% gain.
\n\n
Investor Sentiment and Price Targets
\n
Investor confidence in regional banks has been positive lately, with the sector’s average share price rising 2.6% over the past month. Provident Financial Services’ stock has increased by 1.7% during the same period. Heading into earnings, the consensus analyst price target for Provident stands at $23.13, compared to its current price of $20.57.
\n\n
Exploring Thematic Investment Opportunities
\n
At StockStory, we recognize the value of investing in major trends. Companies like Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO), and Monster Beverage (MNST) have all benefited from powerful growth drivers. In line with this approach, we’ve identified an emerging, profitable growth stock poised to benefit from the rise of AI—and you can access our research on it for free.
","contentId":"12560605167750","contentText":"Provident Financial Services Set to Announce Earnings Provident Financial Services (NYSE:PFS), a regional banking institution, is scheduled to release its latest financial results this Tuesday after the markets close. Here’s a summary of what to watch for. Recent Performance Overview In the previous quarter, Provident Financial Services slightly surpassed Wall Street’s revenue projections, posting $221.7 million in revenue—a 5.3% increase compared to the same period last year. While the company managed to edge past analysts’ tangible book value per share forecasts, its earnings per share matched expectations, resulting in a mixed performance overall. Outlook for the Upcoming Quarter For the current quarter, analysts anticipate that Provident Financial Services will generate $223.5 million in revenue, reflecting an 8.6% year-over-year increase. This growth rate is notably slower than the 79.4% surge seen in the corresponding quarter a year ago. Adjusted earnings per share are projected to reach $0.56. Provident Financial Services Total Revenue Analyst Sentiment and Historical Trends Over the past month, most analysts have maintained their forecasts for the company, indicating expectations for steady performance as earnings approach. Notably, Provident Financial Services has fallen short of revenue estimates on two occasions in the last two years. Peer Comparisons in Regional Banking Several competitors in the regional banking sector have already shared their fourth-quarter results, offering some context for Provident’s upcoming report. ServisFirst Bancshares achieved a 20.7% year-over-year revenue increase, exceeding analyst expectations by 5%. Dime Community Bancshares also outperformed, with revenue rising 24.5% and beating estimates by 5.2%. Following these announcements, ServisFirst Bancshares’ stock climbed 14.6%, while Dime Community Bancshares saw a 12.5% gain. Investor Sentiment and Price Targets Investor confidence in regional banks has been positive lately, with the sector’s average share price rising 2.6% over the past month. Provident Financial Services’ stock has increased by 1.7% during the same period. Heading into earnings, the consensus analyst price target for Provident stands at $23.13, compared to its current price of $20.57. Exploring Thematic Investment Opportunities At StockStory, we recognize the value of investing in major trends. Companies like Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO), and Monster Beverage (MNST) have all benefited from powerful growth drivers. In line with this approach, we’ve identified an emerging, profitable growth stock poised to benefit from the rise of AI—and you can access our research on it for free.","createTime":"1769397120310","detailId":"4341606","id":"4341606","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769396970000","originUrl":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/earnings-watch-provident-financial-services-030218628.html","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":47,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"MSFT,LINK,A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769396970000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"101 finance","title":"Earnings To Monitor: Provident Financial Services (PFS) Will Announce Q4 Results Tomorrow","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
Ledger, one of the French flagships of crypto-security, wants to play with the big leagues. Its ambition no longer stops at designing technical innovations: the company now wants to compete on the global finance field. Benefiting from explosive growth and a booming crypto market, Ledger is preparing its entry to the New York Stock Exchange. A symbolic milestone for a European company aiming to prove that technological excellence can also rhyme with financial ambition.
\n
\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n \n \n
En bref
\n
\n
\n
Ledger plans an IPO in New York, valued at over US$4 billion.
\n
Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays are supporting the IPO, which is planned for 2026.
\n
Crypto hacks will reach $17 billion in 2025, boosting sales of Ledger wallets.
\n
Despite several data leaks, Ledger remains the global leader in secure digital asset storage.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
From Paris to Wall Street: Ledger offers itself a financial second life
\n
Founded in 2014, Ledger first built its reputation on the reliability of its hardware wallets. Today, the company wants to take a new step: an IPO in New York, supported by Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays. The operation could value the company at over 4 billion dollars, nearly triple its last fundraising in 2023.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n
This strategic decision is part of a broader dynamic. Since Donald Trump’s return to the White House, the American administration has made crypto a national strategic focus. As a result, investors flock to crypto infrastructure companies, like BitGo, valued at over 2 billion after its successful NYSE listing.
\n
For Pascal Gauthier, CEO of Ledger, the logic is irrefutable:
\n
\n
Money is in New York today for crypto, nowhere else in the world, and certainly not in Europe.
\n
\n
Ledger therefore joins this strategic migration of European companies toward American finance, ready to become the first French “crypto unicorn” listed on Wall Street.
\n
Trust and security: Ledger’s risky but assumed bet in crypto
\n
But Ledger’s financial ambition comes with a major challenge: regaining users’ trust. The company has suffered several setbacks: data leak of 270,000 customers in 2020, $500,000 hack in 2023, and a flaw in its supplier Global-e in early 2026. Each episode could have undermined its credibility. Yet the opposite happened.
\n
Crises have paradoxically strengthened Ledger’s legitimacy. While hacks reached $17 billion in 2025 according to Chainalysis, users seek to regain control of their assets. Sales of crypto security devices soar, and Ledger registers record revenue, reaching several hundreds of millions.
Its CEO sums up this paradox by explaining that Ledger’s revenues, issuer of the Nano S Plus keys, reach new heights, driven by the rise in hacks and increasingly eager investors to keep control of their keys.
\n
By riding on users’ fears, Ledger turns security into a growth lever. For investors, it is a model as promising as it is risky: the more attacks increase, the more demand for Ledger products explodes.
\n
Ledger’s key figures on the eve of its IPO:
\n
\n
4 billion dollars: targeted valuation for the IPO in New York;
\n
1.5 billion dollars: valuation during the last fundraising in 2023;
\n
17 billion dollars: estimated value of crypto stolen in 2025 according to Chainalysis;
\n
270,000 customers: affected by the 2020 data leak, Ledger’s first major crisis;
\n
2026: planned year for the IPO, marking a new era for crypto security.
\n
\n
Ledger does not claim to be infallible but moves confidently along the well-trodden paths of crypto. The company wants to prove that innovation and ambition can coexist. After all, it is no coincidence that in May last year, it launched an unprecedented crypto card in the United States: a clear symbol of its desire to go further and further.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our \"Read to Earn\" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605167460","contentText":"Ledger, one of the French flagships of crypto-security, wants to play with the big leagues. Its ambition no longer stops at designing technical innovations: the company now wants to compete on the global finance field. Benefiting from explosive growth and a booming crypto market, Ledger is preparing its entry to the New York Stock Exchange. A symbolic milestone for a European company aiming to prove that technological excellence can also rhyme with financial ambition. En bref Ledger plans an IPO in New York, valued at over US$4 billion. Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays are supporting the IPO, which is planned for 2026. Crypto hacks will reach $17 billion in 2025, boosting sales of Ledger wallets. Despite several data leaks, Ledger remains the global leader in secure digital asset storage. From Paris to Wall Street: Ledger offers itself a financial second life Founded in 2014, Ledger first built its reputation on the reliability of its hardware wallets. Today, the company wants to take a new step: an IPO in New York, supported by Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays. The operation could value the company at over 4 billion dollars, nearly triple its last fundraising in 2023. This strategic decision is part of a broader dynamic. Since Donald Trump’s return to the White House, the American administration has made crypto a national strategic focus. As a result, investors flock to crypto infrastructure companies, like BitGo, valued at over 2 billion after its successful NYSE listing. For Pascal Gauthier, CEO of Ledger, the logic is irrefutable: Money is in New York today for crypto, nowhere else in the world, and certainly not in Europe. Ledger therefore joins this strategic migration of European companies toward American finance, ready to become the first French “crypto unicorn” listed on Wall Street. Trust and security: Ledger’s risky but assumed bet in crypto But Ledger’s financial ambition comes with a major challenge: regaining users’ trust. The company has suffered several setbacks: data leak of 270,000 customers in 2020, $500,000 hack in 2023, and a flaw in its supplier Global-e in early 2026. Each episode could have undermined its credibility. Yet the opposite happened. Crises have paradoxically strengthened Ledger’s legitimacy. While hacks reached $17 billion in 2025 according to Chainalysis, users seek to regain control of their assets. Sales of crypto security devices soar, and Ledger registers record revenue, reaching several hundreds of millions. Secure your cryptos with Ledger Its CEO sums up this paradox by explaining that Ledger’s revenues, issuer of the Nano S Plus keys, reach new heights, driven by the rise in hacks and increasingly eager investors to keep control of their keys. By riding on users’ fears, Ledger turns security into a growth lever. For investors, it is a model as promising as it is risky: the more attacks increase, the more demand for Ledger products explodes. Ledger’s key figures on the eve of its IPO: 4 billion dollars: targeted valuation for the IPO in New York; 1.5 billion dollars: valuation during the last fundraising in 2023; 17 billion dollars: estimated value of crypto stolen in 2025 according to Chainalysis; 270,000 customers: affected by the 2020 data leak, Ledger’s first major crisis; 2026: planned year for the IPO, marking a new era for crypto security. Ledger does not claim to be infallible but moves confidently along the well-trodden paths of crypto. The company wants to prove that innovation and ambition can coexist. After all, it is no coincidence that in May last year, it launched an unprecedented crypto card in the United States: a clear symbol of its desire to go further and further. Maximize your Cointribune experience with our \"Read to Earn\" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.","createTime":"1769366220188","detailId":"4339652","id":"4339652","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/cb341facb3fdf349909076aaa1d1bd721769366200065.png","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769366199000","originUrl":"https://www.cointribune.com/en/after-bitgo-ledger-tries-its-luck-on-the-new-york-stock-exchange/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/cb341facb3fdf349909076aaa1d1bd721769366200065.png","readCount":180,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"TRUST,A,LIKE","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769366199000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"Cointribune","title":"After BitGo, Ledger tries its luck on the New York Stock Exchange","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
Agora, a startup founded by entrepreneur and VanEck heir Nick van Eck, is positioning itself for a stablecoin market that’s moving beyond crypto-native trading.
\n
While decentralized finance (DeFi) remains a key growth engine – Agora’s total value locked (TVL) grew 60% last month from DeFi launches, he said — his focus is shifting toward a longer-term bet: stablecoin-powered enterprise payments.
\n
“We’re spending a lot of time across payroll, business-to-business, cross-border payments. Problems real companies actually need to solve,” van Eck, who will be speaking at CoinDesk's Consensus Hong Kong conference next month, said in a recent interview.
\n
He believes adoption by traditional firms is inevitable but slow, delayed by unfamiliar infrastructure, lack of internal policies, and basic education gaps. \"If stablecoin knowledge in the crypto world is a hundred,\" he said, then outside of is \"a five.\"
\n
Agora issues AUSD, a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, and also offers stablecoin-as-a-service for crypto projects wanting to mint their own branded tokens. But van Eck doesn’t recommend it for most. “It only makes sense if you have a closed-loop ecosystem,” he said. “Otherwise, use a major stablecoin.\"
\n
The bigger opportunity, van Eck argued, lies in replacing clunky cross-border payment systems, where pre-funding and transaction costs eat into corporate margins. “If they save 1% on revenue, that might be 5% on EBITDA,” he said. The most likely early adopters? Multinational firms with global vendor networks.
\n
Looking ahead, van Eck sees corporate chains like Circle's Arc, Coinbase's Base or Stripe's Tempo pulling activity away from open-source blockchains. “You’ll see consolidation into a handful of chains,” he predicted, as major firms bring “money, firepower and distribution.”
\n
In this increasingly competitive landscape, Agora’s ambition is to be one of the top five global stablecoin issuers — and to win by building tools businesses actually know how to use.
\n
“They don’t want crypto,” van Eck said. “They want something that feels like a bank account, but better.”
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605166902","contentText":"Agora, a startup founded by entrepreneur and VanEck heir Nick van Eck, is positioning itself for a stablecoin market that’s moving beyond crypto-native trading. While decentralized finance (DeFi) remains a key growth engine – Agora’s total value locked (TVL) grew 60% last month from DeFi launches, he said — his focus is shifting toward a longer-term bet: stablecoin-powered enterprise payments. “We’re spending a lot of time across payroll, business-to-business, cross-border payments. Problems real companies actually need to solve,” van Eck, who will be speaking at CoinDesk's Consensus Hong Kong conference next month, said in a recent interview. He believes adoption by traditional firms is inevitable but slow, delayed by unfamiliar infrastructure, lack of internal policies, and basic education gaps. \"If stablecoin knowledge in the crypto world is a hundred,\" he said, then outside of is \"a five.\" Agora issues AUSD, a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, and also offers stablecoin-as-a-service for crypto projects wanting to mint their own branded tokens. But van Eck doesn’t recommend it for most. “It only makes sense if you have a closed-loop ecosystem,” he said. “Otherwise, use a major stablecoin.\" The bigger opportunity, van Eck argued, lies in replacing clunky cross-border payment systems, where pre-funding and transaction costs eat into corporate margins. “If they save 1% on revenue, that might be 5% on EBITDA,” he said. The most likely early adopters? Multinational firms with global vendor networks. Looking ahead, van Eck sees corporate chains like Circle's Arc, Coinbase's Base or Stripe's Tempo pulling activity away from open-source blockchains. “You’ll see consolidation into a handful of chains,” he predicted, as major firms bring “money, firepower and distribution.” In this increasingly competitive landscape, Agora’s ambition is to be one of the top five global stablecoin issuers — and to win by building tools businesses actually know how to use. “They don’t want crypto,” van Eck said. “They want something that feels like a bank account, but better.”","createTime":"1769286840318","detailId":"4335760","id":"4335760","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769286790000","originUrl":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/agoras-nick-van-eck-bets-180000827.html","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":119,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,ARC,MAJOR","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769286790000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"101 finance","title":"Agora's Nick van Eck bets on stablecoin boom in enterprise payments","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n
A brand-new PvP Arena game has launched. It’s part of a major collaboration between a major crypto platform and Steve Aoki. It introduces a competitive format that’s built around live rounds, shared stakes, and immediate outcomes. This release signals a move towards gameplay that’s more interactive and event-driven. It’s where players compete in real time without the need to progress through complex systems.
\n
At its core, the Steve Aoki Arena game is designed to be simple to understand. However, that doesn’t make it easy to master. Each round stands alone and has clear rules and a single winner.
\n
A live competitive format built for repeat play
\n
Rather than being a traditional casino title, the Aoki Arena game is positioned as a live PvP experience. Every match takes place in real time, with tension created as players are eliminated one by one. It’s thanks to the fast pace and clear outcomes that rounds are easy to follow. This is the case for both players and viewers who may be watching live streams.
\n
These live streams are planned across major platforms such as Kick and Twitch. This will help to take individual rounds and turn them into shared sessions, a move away from being isolated play sessions. Alongside the gameplay, there will be social drops and real-time community moments that are set to be a part of a much wider rollout. This is all set to encourage players to engage at specific times.
\n
Why Steve Aoki fits the Arena concept
\n
Having Steve Aoki on board is about much more than name recognition. His background in music is all about high-energy live performances, where timing, crowd reaction, and momentum play a major role. It’s that live, reactive environment that translates perfectly into a competitive Arena format that is focused on pressure and the need to make split-second decisions.
\n
Beyond music, Aoki has long been active in crypto and gaming spaces, which helps explain why this collaboration feels aligned rather than forced.
\n
More than a single game launch
\n
The Arena is just a small part of a wider collaboration. It’s set to include the Aoki Drop, which is a series of timed rewards that combine instant wins and exclusive prizes. These drops will run alongside live play, and this will help to reinforce the event-driven nature of the experience.
\n
The collaboration also extends into limited-edition releases and real-world experiences. An Aoki x BitcoinVIP collection has been announced as the first of several planned collector pieces, with further details expected later in the year. In addition, VIP experiences tied to Steve Aoki’s live shows are part of the broader offering, linking digital competition with offline access.
\n
Platform integration and long-term intent
\n
Everything linked to the Arena experience can be found directly on the BitcoinVIP platform. The collaboration between the brand and Aoki means that all drops and future releases will be found on the same site, and you can be sure that the experience will evolve in time.
\n
The Steve Aoki partnership is clearly an ongoing collaboration. It is not about a single game launch or a one-off public reveal. This is something that’s set for the long term, given the way that the two bodies are a perfect match.
\n
A new kind of live PvP experience
\n
By combining live competition, shared prize pools, streaming, and exclusive rewards, the Steve Aoki Arena introduces a PvP format that feels closer to a live event than a traditional game. Its appeal lies in clarity and pace, with each round delivering a complete experience from start to finish.
\n
","contentId":"12560605163562","contentText":"A brand-new PvP Arena game has launched. It’s part of a major collaboration between a major crypto platform and Steve Aoki. It introduces a competitive format that’s built around live rounds, shared stakes, and immediate outcomes. This release signals a move towards gameplay that’s more interactive and event-driven. It’s where players compete in real time without the need to progress through complex systems. At its core, the Steve Aoki Arena game is designed to be simple to understand. However, that doesn’t make it easy to master. Each round stands alone and has clear rules and a single winner. A live competitive format built for repeat play Rather than being a traditional casino title, the Aoki Arena game is positioned as a live PvP experience. Every match takes place in real time, with tension created as players are eliminated one by one. It’s thanks to the fast pace and clear outcomes that rounds are easy to follow. This is the case for both players and viewers who may be watching live streams. These live streams are planned across major platforms such as Kick and Twitch. This will help to take individual rounds and turn them into shared sessions, a move away from being isolated play sessions. Alongside the gameplay, there will be social drops and real-time community moments that are set to be a part of a much wider rollout. This is all set to encourage players to engage at specific times. Why Steve Aoki fits the Arena concept Having Steve Aoki on board is about much more than name recognition. His background in music is all about high-energy live performances, where timing, crowd reaction, and momentum play a major role. It’s that live, reactive environment that translates perfectly into a competitive Arena format that is focused on pressure and the need to make split-second decisions. Beyond music, Aoki has long been active in crypto and gaming spaces, which helps explain why this collaboration feels aligned rather than forced. More than a single game launch The Arena is just a small part of a wider collaboration. It’s set to include the Aoki Drop, which is a series of timed rewards that combine instant wins and exclusive prizes. These drops will run alongside live play, and this will help to reinforce the event-driven nature of the experience. The collaboration also extends into limited-edition releases and real-world experiences. An Aoki x BitcoinVIP collection has been announced as the first of several planned collector pieces, with further details expected later in the year. In addition, VIP experiences tied to Steve Aoki’s live shows are part of the broader offering, linking digital competition with offline access. Platform integration and long-term intent Everything linked to the Arena experience can be found directly on the BitcoinVIP platform. The collaboration between the brand and Aoki means that all drops and future releases will be found on the same site, and you can be sure that the experience will evolve in time. The Steve Aoki partnership is clearly an ongoing collaboration. It is not about a single game launch or a one-off public reveal. This is something that’s set for the long term, given the way that the two bodies are a perfect match. A new kind of live PvP experience By combining live competition, shared prize pools, streaming, and exclusive rewards, the Steve Aoki Arena introduces a PvP format that feels closer to a live event than a traditional game. Its appeal lies in clarity and pace, with each round delivering a complete experience from start to finish.","createTime":"1769074980212","detailId":"4312337","id":"4312337","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769074957000","originUrl":"https://blockchainreporter.net/inside-the-steve-aoki-arena-how-a-new-pvp-game-is-redefining-live-crypto-competition/","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":135,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,HIGH,MAJOR","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769074957000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"BlockchainReporter","title":"Inside the Steve Aoki Arena: How a New PvP Game Is Redefining Live Crypto Competition","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Toto Shares Surge on Rising Demand for Chipmaking Materials
\n
Toto Ltd., a Japanese company best known for its innovative toilets, experienced its largest stock jump in five years as investors grew optimistic about the company’s lesser-known semiconductor materials business, fueled by soaring memory chip demand.
\n
The company’s shares climbed up to 11%, marking their biggest single-day increase since early 2021. This rally followed a report from Goldman Sachs analysts, who upgraded Toto’s rating to “buy” and highlighted the potential of its electrostatic chucks—key components in NAND chip manufacturing. These chucks are expected to see heightened demand as the expansion of AI infrastructure puts pressure on both premium and standard memory supplies.
\n
Top Stories from Bloomberg
\n
\n \n
\n
Analysts Sachiko Okada and Sayako Tominaga cited the prospect of “substantial profit increases” from Toto’s electrostatic chuck division as a key reason for their positive outlook. They noted that the current tightness in the memory market is likely to benefit the company. Toto representatives also anticipate that ongoing construction of AI data centers will continue to drive demand for these specialized components.
\n
Although Toto is widely recognized for its heated toilet seats and washlets, the company has long supplied advanced ceramic parts and films to the semiconductor and display industries. Since 1988, Toto has mass-produced electrostatic chucks, which are used to secure silicon wafers during chip fabrication, helping to manage both temperature and contamination. According to Bloomberg data, Toto’s new business segments contributed 42% of its operating income in the fiscal year ending March 2025.
\n
Major tech firms like Meta Platforms and Amazon are investing heavily in AI data centers, resulting in a global shortage of semiconductors. This has prompted memory manufacturers such as SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, and Kioxia Holdings to boost production, further increasing demand for Toto’s products.
\n
Fine ceramics, which Toto uses in its chipmaking materials, share similarities with the ceramics found in its toilets but are as strong as metals. These ceramics are lighter than metal, can withstand higher temperatures, and do not interfere electrically with chipmaking equipment, though they are more fragile and expensive to produce.
\n
Japan’s Unique Role in the Semiconductor Industry
\n
Japan’s deep roots in chip manufacturing have led a variety of companies—including those outside traditional tech sectors—to develop semiconductor-related businesses. For example, Ajinomoto, the company behind MSG seasoning, now produces insulating films for chips, leveraging its expertise in amino acids. Similarly, cosmetics maker Kao has entered the chip wafer cleaning market.
\n
Market Impact and Sector Performance
\n
The surge in Toto’s stock helped make ceramics the top-performing sector on the Topix index in Tokyo that afternoon. The rally coincided with broader gains in AI-related stocks, with companies like SoftBank Group and chip equipment maker Disco Corp. also posting double-digit increases.
Pump.fun has recently announced a fund designed to finance early-stage projects built openly on its platform. Despite the ecosystem-focused initiative, whale dumping, along with a bearish pattern developing on the daily chart, hints that the token may be looking at more downside in the upcoming sessions.
\n
According to data from crypto.news, Pump.fun (PUMP) rose 12.5% to an intraday high of $0.0027 on Thursday, Jan. 22, before stabilizing at around $0.0026.
\n
PUMP’s rally followed after the Pump.fun team unveiled Pump Fund, a new investment arm that will finance early-stage projects built openly on its platform. Under the program, 12 selected teams will each receive $250,000 in funding at a fixed $10 million valuation.
\n
This initiative officially kicked off on Monday, Jan. 19, with a 30-day “Build in Public” hackathon designed to move the ecosystem beyond its reputation as a mere factory for viral memecoins.
\n
Such ecosystem-oriented developments often stir renewed interest among developers and retail investors by providing actual utility and mentorship, and hence help support prices at least in the long run.
\n
Pump.fun price at risk
\n
However, despite the positive news, recent whale activity suggests a different scenario could be at play. Data from Santiment indicates that the number of whales holding between 10,000 and 1 billion PUMP tokens has dropped this week.
\n
\n Source: \n Santiment \n
\n
Typically, when whales start to lose interest in a token, it often leads to a significant erosion of buying pressure, which leaves the price vulnerable to retail-driven volatility and downside momentum.
\n
At the same time, PUMP price action is close to confirming a rising broadening wedge pattern that has been taking shape since late December last year.
\n
\n Pump.fun price forms a rising broadening wedge on the daily chart — Jan. 22 | Source: \n crypto.news \n
\n
Such a pattern is formed when an asset’s price makes higher highs and higher lows within two ascending diverging trendlines, signalling increasing volatility and a potential bearish reversal upon a breakdown below the lower support line.
\n
Technical indicators such as the MACD and Chaikin Money Flow index showed signs that bears were starting to gain footing in the market. Notably, the MACD line was approaching a bearish crossover with the signal line, and the CMF is close to falling below the zero line, which indicates that capital is beginning to flow out of the asset.
\n
Based on the bearish pattern and the technical signals, a sustained drop below the 50-day SMA support level at approximately $0.0024 could position the token for more decline.
\n
A decisive break beneath this level could help bears target the Dec. 24 low of $0.0016, which stands approximately 38% lower than the current price.
\n
","contentId":"12560605163477","contentText":"Pump.fun has recently announced a fund designed to finance early-stage projects built openly on its platform. Despite the ecosystem-focused initiative, whale dumping, along with a bearish pattern developing on the daily chart, hints that the token may be looking at more downside in the upcoming sessions. According to data from crypto.news, Pump.fun (PUMP) rose 12.5% to an intraday high of $0.0027 on Thursday, Jan. 22, before stabilizing at around $0.0026. PUMP’s rally followed after the Pump.fun team unveiled Pump Fund, a new investment arm that will finance early-stage projects built openly on its platform. Under the program, 12 selected teams will each receive $250,000 in funding at a fixed $10 million valuation. This initiative officially kicked off on Monday, Jan. 19, with a 30-day “Build in Public” hackathon designed to move the ecosystem beyond its reputation as a mere factory for viral memecoins. Such ecosystem-oriented developments often stir renewed interest among developers and retail investors by providing actual utility and mentorship, and hence help support prices at least in the long run. Pump.fun price at risk However, despite the positive news, recent whale activity suggests a different scenario could be at play. Data from Santiment indicates that the number of whales holding between 10,000 and 1 billion PUMP tokens has dropped this week. Source: Santiment Typically, when whales start to lose interest in a token, it often leads to a significant erosion of buying pressure, which leaves the price vulnerable to retail-driven volatility and downside momentum. At the same time, PUMP price action is close to confirming a rising broadening wedge pattern that has been taking shape since late December last year. Pump.fun price forms a rising broadening wedge on the daily chart — Jan. 22 | Source: crypto.news Such a pattern is formed when an asset’s price makes higher highs and higher lows within two ascending diverging trendlines, signalling increasing volatility and a potential bearish reversal upon a breakdown below the lower support line. Technical indicators such as the MACD and Chaikin Money Flow index showed signs that bears were starting to gain footing in the market. Notably, the MACD line was approaching a bearish crossover with the signal line, and the CMF is close to falling below the zero line, which indicates that capital is beginning to flow out of the asset. Based on the bearish pattern and the technical signals, a sustained drop below the 50-day SMA support level at approximately $0.0024 could position the token for more decline. A decisive break beneath this level could help bears target the Dec. 24 low of $0.0016, which stands approximately 38% lower than the current price.","createTime":"1769071920299","detailId":"4311804","id":"4311804","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/82ebd70c10a054f5d07838a1a1308a711769071882679.webp,https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/2ba864d849b718d16abc2dc119129d7c1769071882612.webp","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1769071882000","originUrl":"https://crypto.news/pump-fun-price-charts-a-bearish-wedge-pattern-as-whales-exit-will-it-crash/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/82ebd70c10a054f5d07838a1a1308a711769071882679.webp","readCount":171,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"PUMP,JAN,A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1769071882000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/8b16c8b69b7e8e3cfd4609f75771e0fd1769071882778.jpg","sourceName":"Crypto.News","title":" Pump.fun price charts a bearish wedge pattern as whales exit, will it crash? ","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
BlockBeats News, January 21st: Cryptocurrency wallet Rainbow announced that it will take a snapshot for the RNBW token airdrop on January 26th at 16:20 EST, with the official airdrop taking place on February 5th.
\n
\n
Previously, the cryptocurrency wallet Rainbow disclosed the RNBW tokenomics, with a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The distribution at TGE includes: Airdrop - 15%, Community Pre-sale via CoinList - about 3%, Treasury - 47%, Team - 12.2%, Investors - 7.8%, Community - 15%. The circulating supply at TGE is approximately 20% (including airdrop, pre-sale, etc.).
\n \n
","contentId":"12560605161145","contentText":"BlockBeats News, January 21st: Cryptocurrency wallet Rainbow announced that it will take a snapshot for the RNBW token airdrop on January 26th at 16:20 EST, with the official airdrop taking place on February 5th. Previously, the cryptocurrency wallet Rainbow disclosed the RNBW tokenomics, with a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The distribution at TGE includes: Airdrop - 15%, Community Pre-sale via CoinList - about 3%, Treasury - 47%, Team - 12.2%, Investors - 7.8%, Community - 15%. The circulating supply at TGE is approximately 20% (including airdrop, pre-sale, etc.).","createTime":"1768959840067","detailId":"4294084","id":"4294084","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1768959788000","originUrl":"https://en.theblockbeats.news/flash/329000","pageType":5,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":224,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"RBW,A,TOKEN","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407365","sectionName":"","showTime":"1768959788000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/942d23554b475e3a536a432d9e98b1271768959788864.png","sourceName":"BlockBeats","title":"Rainbow will take a snapshot on January 26, with the official airdrop on February 5.","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
Bitcoin’s price plummeted and global markets were shaken after US President Donald Trump threatened extensive tariffs on NATO countries over control of Greenland on Saturday.
\n
Accordingly, the US will impose a 10% tariff on goods from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Finland starting February 1st, and this rate will increase to 25% by June.
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n
While these events negatively impacted Bitcoin, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mike McGlone, who generally predicts a decline for BTC in 2025, shared his new analysis.
\n
Mike McGlone, in a statement on LinkedIn, claimed that if the Bitcoin price fails to rise above $100,000, the cycle will have come to an end and it could fall to $10,000.
\n
\n
\n @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width:320px; height: 100px; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width: 728px; height: 90px; } } \n
“A failed rally in 2025 suggests a cautious short position (bet on a decline) scenario for 2026.”
\n
Staying below $100,000 and failing to rise above it could signal the end of the game/bull run, and a normal pullback towards $10,000 is possible.
\n
\n
At this point, the analyst viewed the drop below the 200-day moving average and the rebound in early 2026 not as an uptrend, but as a phase of showing strength. The analyst also added that a correction to $50,000 this year would be a typical pullback.
\n
McGlone concluded by saying that a stock market recovery is necessary for Bitcoin to gain further value, and that metals (precious metals), rather than cryptocurrencies, may form a relative peak this year.
\n
“Bitcoin and gold have provided significant returns over the past decade, but cryptocurrencies have surged excessively last year. Therefore, metals (precious metals) may reach a relative peak this year.”
\n
Furthermore, depending on how events unfold, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may face downward pressure.
\n
\n
\n @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width:320px; height: 100px; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width: 728px; height: 90px; } } \n
","contentId":"12560605158802","contentText":"Bitcoin’s price plummeted and global markets were shaken after US President Donald Trump threatened extensive tariffs on NATO countries over control of Greenland on Saturday. Accordingly, the US will impose a 10% tariff on goods from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Finland starting February 1st, and this rate will increase to 25% by June. While these events negatively impacted Bitcoin, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mike McGlone, who generally predicts a decline for BTC in 2025, shared his new analysis. Mike McGlone, in a statement on LinkedIn, claimed that if the Bitcoin price fails to rise above $100,000, the cycle will have come to an end and it could fall to $10,000. @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width:320px; height: 100px; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width: 728px; height: 90px; } } window.sevioads = window.sevioads || []; var sevioads_preferences = []; sevioads_preferences[0] = {}; sevioads_preferences[0].zone = \"d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"; sevioads_preferences[0].adType = \"banner\"; sevioads_preferences[0].inventoryId = \"709eacfd-152a-4aaf-80d4-86f42d7da427\"; sevioads_preferences[0].accountId = \"c4bfc39b-8b6a-4256-abe5-d1a851156d5c\"; sevioads.push(sevioads_preferences); “A failed rally in 2025 suggests a cautious short position (bet on a decline) scenario for 2026.” Staying below $100,000 and failing to rise above it could signal the end of the game/bull run, and a normal pullback towards $10,000 is possible. At this point, the analyst viewed the drop below the 200-day moving average and the rebound in early 2026 not as an uptrend, but as a phase of showing strength. The analyst also added that a correction to $50,000 this year would be a typical pullback. McGlone concluded by saying that a stock market recovery is necessary for Bitcoin to gain further value, and that metals (precious metals), rather than cryptocurrencies, may form a relative peak this year. “Bitcoin and gold have provided significant returns over the past decade, but cryptocurrencies have surged excessively last year. Therefore, metals (precious metals) may reach a relative peak this year.” Furthermore, depending on how events unfold, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may face downward pressure. @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width:320px; height: 100px; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=\"wrapper-sevio-d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"] { width: 728px; height: 90px; } } window.sevioads = window.sevioads || []; var sevioads_preferences = []; sevioads_preferences[0] = {}; sevioads_preferences[0].zone = \"d098b0a7-6bf7-478a-a0ee-0619d281a09c\"; sevioads_preferences[0].adType = \"banner\"; sevioads_preferences[0].inventoryId = \"709eacfd-152a-4aaf-80d4-86f42d7da427\"; sevioads_preferences[0].accountId = \"c4bfc39b-8b6a-4256-abe5-d1a851156d5c\"; sevioads.push(sevioads_preferences);","createTime":"1768829280030","detailId":"4276353","id":"4276353","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1768829237000","originUrl":"https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/bloomberg-analyst-mike-mcglone-repeats-10-000-warning-for-bitcoin-btc-it-absolutely-needs-to-break-a/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":239,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,BITCOIN,A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1768829237000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/21100d8fc8824935516fff566dded64d1768829237200.png","sourceName":"BitcoinSistemi","title":"Bloomberg Analyst Mike McGlone Repeats $10,000 Warning for Bitcoin (BTC)! “It Absolutely Needs to Break Above This Level!”","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n
\n The chief commercial officer at crypto market maker Auros, Jason Atkins, heightened tensions in the crypto markets by identifying liquidity as the market’s primary challenge, rather than a volatility crisis. Atkins delivered this statement before the Consensus event in Hong Kong. \n
\n \n
Analysts later noted that while institutional interest in crypto has continued to grow throughout 2025, limited market liquidity remains a key barrier, preventing large Wall Street players from entering without causing price disruptions.
\n
This situation prompted Atkins to publish a statement alleging that markets cannot conclude that institutional investors want to participate in their activities if the factors required to make this possible are absent.
\n
According to him, the primary question is whether these markets can handle the significant institutional demand. “It’s one thing to say, ‘we’ve convinced them to come now,’” Atkins added. “It’s another to ask, ‘Do you have enough room for everyone?’”
\n
Auros’s Atkins raises concerns about liquidity status in the crypto markets
\n
As this discussion hit headlines, Atkins still insisted that liquidity has become a key issue in the crypto markets, mainly due to fading market interest. He further explained that substantial sell-offs, such as the October 10 crash, that have outpaced the speed at which traders and leverage can return to the market, are the factors behind this trend.
\n
To better understand this point, industry executives highlighted that liquidity providers shifted their focus from demand generation to demand fulfillment.
\n
This statement indicated that reduced trade activity triggers market makers to lower their risk, thereby heightening volatility, which in turn leads to tighter risk protocols and reduced market liquidity.
\n
In the meantime, Atkins argued that this situation cannot be solved when institutions serve as stabilizers while markets remain weak. The incident demonstrates that the market lacks a natural safety net in difficult times.
\n
As a result, a cycle is established in which volatility, caution, and illiquidity reinforce one another, thereby suppressing market performance, even as long-term yields are strong.
\n
At this point, Atkins highlighted that volatility itself does not scare off major investors, but the problem arises when volatility meets weak markets. He also acknowledged that it is difficult to handle volatility in thin markets, as safeguarding one’s investment is challenging, and selling them off is even more difficult.
\n
Institutions face significant challenges in the crypto industry
\n
Atkins’ statement illustrated that the current situation in the crypto markets is substantially greater for institutions than for individual traders. Moreover, it is worth noting that major investors have adopted stringent rules for capital preservation, implying they are limited in their ability to accept liquidity risk.
\n
“At that level of wealth, or if you are a huge institution,” he said, adding that, “it’s not just about getting the highest returns. It’s about getting the best returns while keeping your capital safe.”
\n
Atkins also expressed disapproval of the idea that money is transferred from crypto to AI, arguing that these two sectors are at contrasting stages of development.
\n
Following his argument, reports highlighted that, while artificial intelligence has existed for some time, the recent heightened interest in AI has never been seen before and is not causing funds to leave the crypto ecosystem.
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605157502","contentText":"The chief commercial officer at crypto market maker Auros, Jason Atkins, heightened tensions in the crypto markets by identifying liquidity as the market’s primary challenge, rather than a volatility crisis. Atkins delivered this statement before the Consensus event in Hong Kong. Analysts later noted that while institutional interest in crypto has continued to grow throughout 2025, limited market liquidity remains a key barrier, preventing large Wall Street players from entering without causing price disruptions. This situation prompted Atkins to publish a statement alleging that markets cannot conclude that institutional investors want to participate in their activities if the factors required to make this possible are absent. According to him, the primary question is whether these markets can handle the significant institutional demand. “It’s one thing to say, ‘we’ve convinced them to come now,’” Atkins added. “It’s another to ask, ‘Do you have enough room for everyone?’” Auros’s Atkins raises concerns about liquidity status in the crypto markets As this discussion hit headlines, Atkins still insisted that liquidity has become a key issue in the crypto markets, mainly due to fading market interest. He further explained that substantial sell-offs, such as the October 10 crash, that have outpaced the speed at which traders and leverage can return to the market, are the factors behind this trend. To better understand this point, industry executives highlighted that liquidity providers shifted their focus from demand generation to demand fulfillment. This statement indicated that reduced trade activity triggers market makers to lower their risk, thereby heightening volatility, which in turn leads to tighter risk protocols and reduced market liquidity. In the meantime, Atkins argued that this situation cannot be solved when institutions serve as stabilizers while markets remain weak. The incident demonstrates that the market lacks a natural safety net in difficult times. As a result, a cycle is established in which volatility, caution, and illiquidity reinforce one another, thereby suppressing market performance, even as long-term yields are strong. At this point, Atkins highlighted that volatility itself does not scare off major investors, but the problem arises when volatility meets weak markets. He also acknowledged that it is difficult to handle volatility in thin markets, as safeguarding one’s investment is challenging, and selling them off is even more difficult. Institutions face significant challenges in the crypto industry Atkins’ statement illustrated that the current situation in the crypto markets is substantially greater for institutions than for individual traders. Moreover, it is worth noting that major investors have adopted stringent rules for capital preservation, implying they are limited in their ability to accept liquidity risk. “At that level of wealth, or if you are a huge institution,” he said, adding that, “it’s not just about getting the highest returns. It’s about getting the best returns while keeping your capital safe.” Atkins also expressed disapproval of the idea that money is transferred from crypto to AI, arguing that these two sectors are at contrasting stages of development. Following his argument, reports highlighted that, while artificial intelligence has existed for some time, the recent heightened interest in AI has never been seen before and is not causing funds to leave the crypto ecosystem.","createTime":"1768710480407","detailId":"4266465","id":"4266465","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1768710451000","originUrl":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/crypto-illiquidity-is-blocking-wall-street/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":161,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,BTC,BITCOIN","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1768710451000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/a6ce7a6a0dc72966018dd7e0912c760d1768710451998.jpg","sourceName":"Cointelegraph","title":"Auros warns crypto Illiquidity prevents Wall Street from entering market","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Vaulta, formerly EOS, plunged to a lows of $0.14 to mark its drop to a new all-time low.
\n
The token was down 20% in the past 24 hours and saw trading volume spike by more than 400%.
\n
Selling pressure might see A extend losses to a new level.
\n
\n
Vaulta’s price has crashed 20% in the past 24 hours, with bears smashing through support to hit a new all-time low under $0.14.
\n
This brutal drop, which occurred amid a spike in daily spot volume, deepens the pain for the token formerly known as EOS, which had traded as high as $0.77 in May last year.
\n
If not aware, Vaulta rebranded from the former EOS network in early 2025, moving from a smart contracts-focused platform to a web3 banking network.
\n
Bulls saw the A token rise to the all-time high highlighted above before this uptick began to evaporate.
\n
The past 24 hours have seen Dash and Axie Infinity extend gains, but on the other end of the line are top losers like Kaito and Vaulta.
\n
Vaulta price: profit-taking sees A hit a new all-time low
\n
The panic selling that gripped the broader crypto market as Bitcoin shed gains from its all-time high of $126,000 meant A dumped sharply.
\n
Post-rebrand optimism fading allowed sellers to accelerate the capitulation.
\n
Vaulta’s slide has now pushed prices to a new all-time low, with sellers flooding the market and crushing momentum. Data from CoinMarketCap shows daily trading volume jumped more than 400% to $128 million.
\n
\n \n Vaulta price chart by CoinMarketCap \n
\n
The downside action that has led to a broader altcoin market slowdown could amplify the pain for Vaulta.
\n
Many altcoins’ struggles are tied to Bitcoin’s own stumbles below $100,000 and current poise near key support levels.
\n
Technical outlook spells doom
\n
Vaulta’s charts paint a nightmare scenario for bulls. The token has recently recoiled off the 50-day exponential moving average, which has acted as a resistance zone around $0.18-$0.20.
\n
Other technical indicators signal a bearish stranglehold, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sloping towards the oversold territory. While it could allow for a reversal, the reading of 34 means there is room for another leg down.
\n
Elsewhere, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator hints at a bearish crossover.
\n
\n \n
\n
Buyers may eye a rebound amid long-shot catalysts such as network upgrades and broader altcoin market bounces. However, near-term sentiment remains toxic with open interest sinking to $13 million.
\n
According to Coinglass data, the unforgiving downside action has also pushed the open interest weighted funding rate to -0.0294%.
","contentId":"12560605156595","contentText":"Vaulta, formerly EOS, plunged to a lows of $0.14 to mark its drop to a new all-time low. The token was down 20% in the past 24 hours and saw trading volume spike by more than 400%. Selling pressure might see A extend losses to a new level. Vaulta’s price has crashed 20% in the past 24 hours, with bears smashing through support to hit a new all-time low under $0.14. This brutal drop, which occurred amid a spike in daily spot volume, deepens the pain for the token formerly known as EOS, which had traded as high as $0.77 in May last year. If not aware, Vaulta rebranded from the former EOS network in early 2025, moving from a smart contracts-focused platform to a web3 banking network. Bulls saw the A token rise to the all-time high highlighted above before this uptick began to evaporate. The past 24 hours have seen Dash and Axie Infinity extend gains, but on the other end of the line are top losers like Kaito and Vaulta. Vaulta price: profit-taking sees A hit a new all-time low The panic selling that gripped the broader crypto market as Bitcoin shed gains from its all-time high of $126,000 meant A dumped sharply. Post-rebrand optimism fading allowed sellers to accelerate the capitulation. Vaulta’s slide has now pushed prices to a new all-time low, with sellers flooding the market and crushing momentum. Data from CoinMarketCap shows daily trading volume jumped more than 400% to $128 million. Vaulta price chart by CoinMarketCap The downside action that has led to a broader altcoin market slowdown could amplify the pain for Vaulta. Many altcoins’ struggles are tied to Bitcoin’s own stumbles below $100,000 and current poise near key support levels. Technical outlook spells doom Vaulta’s charts paint a nightmare scenario for bulls. The token has recently recoiled off the 50-day exponential moving average, which has acted as a resistance zone around $0.18-$0.20. Other technical indicators signal a bearish stranglehold, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sloping towards the oversold territory. While it could allow for a reversal, the reading of 34 means there is room for another leg down. Elsewhere, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator hints at a bearish crossover. Buyers may eye a rebound amid long-shot catalysts such as network upgrades and broader altcoin market bounces. However, near-term sentiment remains toxic with open interest sinking to $13 million. According to Coinglass data, the unforgiving downside action has also pushed the open interest weighted funding rate to -0.0294%. Share this article Categories Markets Tags EOS News","createTime":"1768591560280","detailId":"4259718","id":"4259718","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/69b6511f9b046c79b51e20b34a0de73a1768591470913.png,https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/f34a8cce154cdc15d84e219e336e4ed31768591470982.png,https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/a6dcd50e391a128179b60400dbf051a01768591470737.png","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1768591470000","originUrl":"https://coinjournal.net/news/vaulta-price-crashes-20-to-new-all-time-low-below-0-14/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/69b6511f9b046c79b51e20b34a0de73a1768591470913.png","readCount":260,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,DASH,AXS","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1768591470000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"Coinjournal","title":"Vaulta price crashes 20% to new all-time low below $0.14","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"In the digital asset markets, time is a distorting lens. A single year in crypto can feel like a decade in the traditional financial world. As we navigate the landscape of early 2026, the CoinMarketCap Top 100 has transformed from a playground for experimenters into a fortress of institutional capital. It is a list defined by a revolving door of short-term hype, where the next big thing often vanishes before its first birthday. Yet, amidst this volatile sea of new names and forgotten promises, a familiar flame has been reignited. Chiliz ($CHZ) has officially breached the Top 100 once again. This is not merely a statistical fluctuation, but a data point worth examining within the broader market context.It represents the triumph of conviction over trends and the resilience of a protocol that refused to be buried during the Great Purge of the mid-2020s. Survival in the fortress of 2026 To appreciate why Chiliz reclaiming its spot is a feat of market strength, one must look at the carnage left behind. Comparing the Top 100 of March 2021 to the reality of January 2026 reveals a brutal cleansing. The barrier to entry today is significantly higher than it was five years ago, thanks to what analysts call the Crowding Effect. First, consider the stablecoin colonization. In 2021, stablecoins were a utility on the fringes, occupying barely 5% of the Top 100. Today, they have colonized more than 16% of the list. From USDT and USDC to newer behemoths like USDe and PYUSD, these digital dollars have swallowed the slots once held by innovative altcoins. Then, there is the New Guard Displacement. A staggering 25% of the current Top 100 consists of high-hype tokens launched only in the last 18 months, assets fueled by venture capital and momentary social media dominance. In this competitive environment, the survival rate for legacy projects from the 2021 era is a measly 32%. We have watched billion-dollar treasuries and celebrity-backed protocols crumble. EOS, despite its record-breaking $4.1B raise, now sits outside the gates at #115. Flow, the pioneer that once reached #18 with NBA TopShot, has drifted to #135. Re-entering the Top 100 today requires roughly 3x the market strength it did in 2021.Chiliz is not only maintaining its position but also competing effectively with newer, well-capitalized projects. Clean tokenomics is the antidote to Unlock Bombs While the New Guard of 2025 and 2026 tokens often hides a dark secret, predatory inflation and aggressive VC unlock schedules, Chiliz presents a tokenomics structure that is increasingly uncommon among newer blockchain projects. Investors in 2026 have grown weary of Unlock Bombs, the moment when early-stage VCs dump millions of tokens on retail buyers. Chiliz has already moved past this phase. The $CHZ vesting schedule concluded in 2022. There are no team allocations or seed investors waiting in the wings to liquidate their positions. Every Chiliz token in the market represents real, settled value. Furthermore, the ecosystem has matured into a self-sustaining economy through SportFi Staking. By rewarding those who secure the network with a transparent inflation model, Chiliz offers stakers and validators yields currently averaging around 17%, according to publicly available network data.. In a market where yield is often a mirage, $CHZ provides a tangible, utility-driven return. Perhaps the most compelling argument for the bull case is the current price-to-utility disconnect. While the projects infrastructure, partnerships, and daily active users are at an all-time high, the valuation remains near multi-year lows relative to its peak. This creates a notable gap between current network fundamentals and historical valuation levels. The SportFi masterplan: From engagement to equity Chilizs remarkable staying power is rooted in a simple yet rare foundation, steadfast conviction. While other projects pivoted to every passing fad, from the Metaverse to AI-integrated chains, the Chiliz team has spent eight years perfecting one single narrative which is the intersection of blockchain and global sports. The 2030 strategy, unfolding in Q1 2026, marks the transition of Chiliz from a Fan Token chain into a comprehensive SportFi Protocol. This is the evolution the market has been waiting for: RWA Team Equity. Moving beyond engagement, Chiliz is set to tokenize sports team equity. By tapping into trillion-dollar Real-World Assets (RWA), the protocol will allow $CHZ to capture the direct value of global franchises. US Re-Engagement. Leveraging a favorable 2026 regulatory climate, Chiliz is re-activating its NBA and NFL foundations to lead the American Big Four into the SportFi era. Roster Revamp. Overhauling 80+ partner tokens, including PSG and Man City, from simple engagement utilities into yield-generating SportFi assets. World Cup Dominance. As the 2026 World Cup nears, Chiliz is expanding its roster of national teams beyond Argentina and Portugal, positioning $CHZ as the de facto currency of the worlds premier sporting event. Conclusion: The only team that never lost focus Chiliz is a rarity in a world of ghost chains and fleeting hype. It is a protocol that has outlived its peers, outlived the skeptics, and is now outliving the New Guard. Re-entering the Top 100 is not a fluke, it is the market finally recognizing that the infrastructure for the multi-billion dollar sports economy has already been built. With 100% fully vested tokenomics, a massive staking yield, and a roadmap that leads directly to the 2026 World Cup and team equity tokenization, Chiliz is increasingly positioning itself as a key infrastructure layer within the emerging SportFi category. Its return to the Top 100 highlights how sustained focus and ecosystem development can matter more than short-term market narratives. Bonus facts Crazy fact. Nearly 70% of the top coins from the 21 bull run have officially ghosted the Top 100. While former giants are fading into obscurity, Chiliz just clawed its way back into the elite club. In 2026, that goes beyond short-term market momentum. Did you know that breaking into the Top 100 today is actually 3x harder than it was back in 21? Between stablecoins taking over 16% of the list and a wave of new hype, Chiliz just walked right back past the bouncers.","contentId":"12560605139242","contentText":"In the digital asset markets, time is a distorting lens. A single year in crypto can feel like a decade in the traditional financial world. As we navigate the landscape of early 2026, the CoinMarketCap Top 100 has transformed from a playground for experimenters into a fortress of institutional capital. It is a list defined by a revolving door of short-term hype, where the next big thing often vanishes before its first birthday. Yet, amidst this volatile sea of new names and forgotten promises, a familiar flame has been reignited. Chiliz ($CHZ) has officially breached the Top 100 once again. This is not merely a statistical fluctuation, but a data point worth examining within the broader market context.It represents the triumph of conviction over trends and the resilience of a protocol that refused to be buried during the Great Purge of the mid-2020s. Survival in the fortress of 2026 To appreciate why Chiliz reclaiming its spot is a feat of market strength, one must look at the carnage left behind. Comparing the Top 100 of March 2021 to the reality of January 2026 reveals a brutal cleansing. The barrier to entry today is significantly higher than it was five years ago, thanks to what analysts call the Crowding Effect. First, consider the stablecoin colonization. In 2021, stablecoins were a utility on the fringes, occupying barely 5% of the Top 100. Today, they have colonized more than 16% of the list. From USDT and USDC to newer behemoths like USDe and PYUSD, these digital dollars have swallowed the slots once held by innovative altcoins. Then, there is the New Guard Displacement. A staggering 25% of the current Top 100 consists of high-hype tokens launched only in the last 18 months, assets fueled by venture capital and momentary social media dominance. In this competitive environment, the survival rate for legacy projects from the 2021 era is a measly 32%. We have watched billion-dollar treasuries and celebrity-backed protocols crumble. EOS, despite its record-breaking $4.1B raise, now sits outside the gates at #115. Flow, the pioneer that once reached #18 with NBA TopShot, has drifted to #135. Re-entering the Top 100 today requires roughly 3x the market strength it did in 2021.Chiliz is not only maintaining its position but also competing effectively with newer, well-capitalized projects. Clean tokenomics is the antidote to Unlock Bombs While the New Guard of 2025 and 2026 tokens often hides a dark secret, predatory inflation and aggressive VC unlock schedules, Chiliz presents a tokenomics structure that is increasingly uncommon among newer blockchain projects. Investors in 2026 have grown weary of Unlock Bombs, the moment when early-stage VCs dump millions of tokens on retail buyers. Chiliz has already moved past this phase. The $CHZ vesting schedule concluded in 2022. There are no team allocations or seed investors waiting in the wings to liquidate their positions. Every Chiliz token in the market represents real, settled value. Furthermore, the ecosystem has matured into a self-sustaining economy through SportFi Staking. By rewarding those who secure the network with a transparent inflation model, Chiliz offers stakers and validators yields currently averaging around 17%, according to publicly available network data.. In a market where yield is often a mirage, $CHZ provides a tangible, utility-driven return. Perhaps the most compelling argument for the bull case is the current price-to-utility disconnect. While the projects infrastructure, partnerships, and daily active users are at an all-time high, the valuation remains near multi-year lows relative to its peak. This creates a notable gap between current network fundamentals and historical valuation levels. The SportFi masterplan: From engagement to equity Chilizs remarkable staying power is rooted in a simple yet rare foundation, steadfast conviction. While other projects pivoted to every passing fad, from the Metaverse to AI-integrated chains, the Chiliz team has spent eight years perfecting one single narrative which is the intersection of blockchain and global sports. The 2030 strategy, unfolding in Q1 2026, marks the transition of Chiliz from a Fan Token chain into a comprehensive SportFi Protocol. This is the evolution the market has been waiting for: RWA Team Equity. Moving beyond engagement, Chiliz is set to tokenize sports team equity. By tapping into trillion-dollar Real-World Assets (RWA), the protocol will allow $CHZ to capture the direct value of global franchises. US Re-Engagement. Leveraging a favorable 2026 regulatory climate, Chiliz is re-activating its NBA and NFL foundations to lead the American Big Four into the SportFi era. Roster Revamp. Overhauling 80+ partner tokens, including PSG and Man City, from simple engagement utilities into yield-generating SportFi assets. World Cup Dominance. As the 2026 World Cup nears, Chiliz is expanding its roster of national teams beyond Argentina and Portugal, positioning $CHZ as the de facto currency of the worlds premier sporting event. Conclusion: The only team that never lost focus Chiliz is a rarity in a world of ghost chains and fleeting hype. It is a protocol that has outlived its peers, outlived the skeptics, and is now outliving the New Guard. Re-entering the Top 100 is not a fluke, it is the market finally recognizing that the infrastructure for the multi-billion dollar sports economy has already been built. With 100% fully vested tokenomics, a massive staking yield, and a roadmap that leads directly to the 2026 World Cup and team equity tokenization, Chiliz is increasingly positioning itself as a key infrastructure layer within the emerging SportFi category. Its return to the Top 100 highlights how sustained focus and ecosystem development can matter more than short-term market narratives. Bonus facts Crazy fact. Nearly 70% of the top coins from the 21 bull run have officially ghosted the Top 100. While former giants are fading into obscurity, Chiliz just clawed its way back into the elite club. In 2026, that goes beyond short-term market momentum. Did you know that breaking into the Top 100 today is actually 3x harder than it was back in 21? Between stablecoins taking over 16% of the list and a wave of new hype, Chiliz just walked right back past the bouncers.","createTime":"1767966001485","detailId":"4153148","id":"4153148","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1767965963000","originUrl":"https://beincrypto.com/chiliz-top-100-market-resilience-2026/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":262,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,BGTEST002,CHZ","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1767965963000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"BeInCrypto","title":"What Chiliz Return to the Top 100 Says About Market Resilience in 2026","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
Every year, TechCrunch’s Startup Battlefield pitch contest draws thousands of applicants. We whittle those applications down to the top 200 contenders, and of them, the top 20 compete on the big stage to become the winner, taking home the Startup Battlefield Cup and a cash prize of $100,000. But the remaining 180 startups all blew us away as well in their respective categories and compete in their own pitch competition.
\n
Here is the full list of the health and wellness Startup Battlefield 200 selectees, along with a note on why they landed in the competition.
\n
Akara
\n
What it does: Uses AI sensors and autonomous UV disinfection robots to prepare operating rooms for surgery faster.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Doing more surgeries in a day not only helps patients but also makes more money for the hospitals.
\n
Arm Bionics
\n
What it does: This Armenian startup develops 3D-printed prosthetic arms.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The bionic arm is relatively affordable, making it highly accessible within its region.
\n
ArtSkin
\n
What it does: Develops electronic artificial skin with sensors to restore the sense of touch for people with prosthetic limbs.
\n
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n Techcrunch event \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Join the Disrupt 2026 Waitlist
\n
Add yourself to the Disrupt 2026 waitlist to be first in line when Early Bird tickets drop. Past Disrupts have brought Google Cloud, Netflix, Microsoft, Box, Phia, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Hugging Face, Elad Gil, and Vinod Khosla to the stages — part of 250+ industry leaders driving 200+ sessions built to fuel your growth and sharpen your edge. Plus, meet the hundreds of startups innovating across every sector.
\n
\n
\n
Join the Disrupt 2026 Waitlist
\n
Add yourself to the Disrupt 2026 waitlist to be first in line when Early Bird tickets drop. Past Disrupts have brought Google Cloud, Netflix, Microsoft, Box, Phia, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Hugging Face, Elad Gil, and Vinod Khosla to the stages — part of 250+ industry leaders driving 200+ sessions built to fuel your growth and sharpen your edge. Plus, meet the hundreds of startups innovating across every sector.
Why it’s noteworthy: The technology is noninvasive and can be integrated with existing prosthetics.
\n
AWEAR
\n
What it does: Ear-worn EEG device monitors and provides feedback on chronic stress.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Just like a Fitbit tracks steps, this wearable helps people take charge by measuring brain activity to guide them in reducing stress levels.
\n
Axoft
\n
What it does: Developing a tiny brain implant that communicates with the nervous system to treat severe neurological conditions.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The soft material helps the technology safely connect to the nervous system for many years to treat serious diseases.
\n
Care Hero
\n
What it does: Facilitates a tech-empowered caregiver network for the elderly and disabled.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Addressees the shortageof caregivers by using technology to maximize how many patients a caregiver treats.
\n
Che Innovations Uganda
\n
What it does: This Ugandan startup develops medical devices, including NeoNest, an affordable transport warmer for preterm babies.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Because rural areas of Africa don’t have access to transport incubators.
\n
ELLUSTRÖS
\n
What it does: Provides technology that uses AI and image analysis to adjust posture on seats for ergonomic fit.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: It eliminates the need to manually adjust chair settings, reduces injures, and enhances productivity.
\n
Endless Health
\n
What it does: Provides at-home health assessments to predict heart health and metabolic disease.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Potential for early disease detection without going to the doctor.
\n
Eos.ai
\n
What it does: Cleaning, compressing, and harmonizing of fragmented data stored in electronic medical records.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Standardizing medical data can help improve AI model performance.
\n
Food for Health
\n
What it does: Offers personalized food and grocery shopping guide.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The startup’s apphelps consumers choose foods that support their specific health needs with scientific certainty.
\n
GLITCHERS Lab
\n
What it does: Uses video games to collect brain data for health research, especially for Alzheimer’s.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Gamifying cognitive testing to create a large dataset.
\n
Innov8 AI
\n
What it does: Uses AI to analyze social mediaand flag disruptive key narratives.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The tool helps companies quickly notice unfavorable sentiment and reputation risks about their brand.
\n
Lexi AI
\n
What it does: Provides a multilingual, AI-powered medical interpretation.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Fast and cost-efficient medical translations can save lives.
\n
MariTest
\n
What it does: Developing a bloodless, rapid diagnostic tool for the early detection and treatment of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Its bloodless technology removes the reliance on medical technicians, accelerating diagnosis in rural areas.
\n
Meo Health
\n
What it does: A tech-enabled recovery program for people suffering from long Covid.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s drug-free approach has been clinically proven to improve patients’ symptoms.
\n
Monere
\n
What it does: An AI-powered platform that uses a smartphone camera to analyze a user’s eyelid to monitor and reduce the risk of anemia and iron deficiency.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s noninvasive test claims to easily and quickly catch anemia.
\n
Near Wave
\n
What it does: This startup’s noninvasive, handheld device claims to be able to measure oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentrations.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: This is a less painful and faster way to collect some of the vital biomarkers.
\n
Neural Drive
\n
What it does: Developing a noninvasive brain-computer interface that allows paralyzed patients to instantly communicate essential and custom messages via a “blink-to-speak” function.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike invasive devices, it can restore communication for paralyzed patients quickly and cost-effectively.
\n
NUSEUM
\n
What it does: A B2B precision nutrition AI platform that converts an individual’s complex health data into evidence-based food, grocery, and recipe recommendations.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s recommendations can help food delivery, e-commerce, diagnostic, health, and insurance sector clients offer better food choices to ultimate customers.
\n
Ovulio Corp.
\n
What it does: Saliva-based hormone monitor for helping manage fertility, menopause, and medical conditions like PCOS.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike alternatives, the noninvasive device is reusable.
\n
Pharos
\n
What it does: Automates the extraction of patient safety data from medical records for reporting to regulatory agencies.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: By using AI, Pharos helps free up clinical staff time while simultaneously preventing patient deaths and harm.
\n
PillarBiome
\n
What it does: Uses AI to deliver personalized, science-backed health recommendations by analyzing your gut microbiome data.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The microbiome is full of rich data that could provide insights into personalized dietary recommendations for better health.
\n
RADiCAIT
\n
What it does: This Oxford spinout uses AI to transform routine CT scans into PET-like scans, bypassing the need for scarce, costly PET imaging.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Obtaining PET-level insights from a regular CT scan is much faster and cheaper.
\n
Serene Sleep
\n
What it does: A simple, minimally invasive procedure to permanently stop snoring and treat sleep apnea.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Tackles the widespread problem of snoring and sleep apnea, a condition that could otherwise require the use of bulky devices like CPAP masks.
\n
Some Other Place
\n
What it does: This startup, which recently rebranded as Hug, connects users with trained, empathetic human listeners for real-time peer support.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: People often feel better after they share worries and emotional burdens without judgment.
\n
SpotitEarly
\n
What it does: An at-home cancer breath test that uses AI technology and trained dogs to sniff out multiple early-stage cancers from compounds in a patient’s breath sample.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Based on studies showing that dogs can use their strong sense of smell to detect cancer, this startup is creating a novel method to integrate that unique ability into an early-detection diagnostic.
\n
Sybil Health
\n
What it does: Offers science-backed, holistic therapies, alongside lifestyle adjustments, to help women manage hormonal changes during menopause.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Consults women how to control menopausal symptoms with hormones or through complementary alternative and naturopathic therapies.
\n
Vital Audio
\n
What it does: Uses bioacoustics technology to capture vital signs like heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory metrics from short voice samples.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Enables health systems to monitor thousands of patients, especially ones in remote regions.
\n
VIZQ Technologies
\n
What it does: Uses AI- and VR-powered technology to make speech and language therapy for children more accessible.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Helps bridge the gap created by the shortage of speech therapists.
\n
Vocadian
\n
What it does: Uses voice AI to diagnose fatigue in the frontline workforce.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s technology could increase productivity and help prevent accidents.
\n
Yuzi Care
\n
What it does: Matches families withbirth and postpartum doulas and care providers.
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Part of a wave of digital maternal health and postpartum startups.
\n
Zemi Labs
\n
What it does: Develops “smart clothing” for athletes that can capture and analyze heart, muscle, skin, and movements of athletes.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike wearable devices, Zemi’s clothing captures a broad range of biosignals, which could ultimately help performance.
\n \n
","contentId":"12560605124678","contentText":"Every year, TechCrunch’s Startup Battlefield pitch contest draws thousands of applicants. We whittle those applications down to the top 200 contenders, and of them, the top 20 compete on the big stage to become the winner, taking home the Startup Battlefield Cup and a cash prize of $100,000. But the remaining 180 startups all blew us away as well in their respective categories and compete in their own pitch competition. Here is the full list of the health and wellness Startup Battlefield 200 selectees, along with a note on why they landed in the competition. Akara What it does: Uses AI sensors and autonomous UV disinfection robots to prepare operating rooms for surgery faster. Why it’s noteworthy: Doing more surgeries in a day not only helps patients but also makes more money for the hospitals. Arm Bionics What it does: This Armenian startup develops 3D-printed prosthetic arms. Why it’s noteworthy: The bionic arm is relatively affordable, making it highly accessible within its region. ArtSkin What it does: Develops electronic artificial skin with sensors to restore the sense of touch for people with prosthetic limbs. Techcrunch event Join the Disrupt 2026 Waitlist Add yourself to the Disrupt 2026 waitlist to be first in line when Early Bird tickets drop. Past Disrupts have brought Google Cloud, Netflix, Microsoft, Box, Phia, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Hugging Face, Elad Gil, and Vinod Khosla to the stages — part of 250+ industry leaders driving 200+ sessions built to fuel your growth and sharpen your edge. Plus, meet the hundreds of startups innovating across every sector. Join the Disrupt 2026 Waitlist Add yourself to the Disrupt 2026 waitlist to be first in line when Early Bird tickets drop. Past Disrupts have brought Google Cloud, Netflix, Microsoft, Box, Phia, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Hugging Face, Elad Gil, and Vinod Khosla to the stages — part of 250+ industry leaders driving 200+ sessions built to fuel your growth and sharpen your edge. Plus, meet the hundreds of startups innovating across every sector. San Francisco | October 13-15, 2026 WAITLIST NOW Why it’s noteworthy: The technology is noninvasive and can be integrated with existing prosthetics. AWEAR What it does: Ear-worn EEG device monitors and provides feedback on chronic stress. Why it’s noteworthy: Just like a Fitbit tracks steps, this wearable helps people take charge by measuring brain activity to guide them in reducing stress levels. Axoft What it does: Developing a tiny brain implant that communicates with the nervous system to treat severe neurological conditions. Why it’s noteworthy: The soft material helps the technology safely connect to the nervous system for many years to treat serious diseases. Care Hero What it does: Facilitates a tech-empowered caregiver network for the elderly and disabled. Why it’s noteworthy: Addressees the shortage of caregivers by using technology to maximize how many patients a caregiver treats. Che Innovations Uganda What it does: This Ugandan startup develops medical devices, including NeoNest, an affordable transport warmer for preterm babies. Why it’s noteworthy: Because rural areas of Africa don’t have access to transport incubators. ELLUSTRÖS What it does: Provides technology that uses AI and image analysis to adjust posture on seats for ergonomic fit. Why it’s noteworthy: It eliminates the need to manually adjust chair settings, reduces injures, and enhances productivity. Endless Health What it does: Provides at-home health assessments to predict heart health and metabolic disease. Why it’s noteworthy: Potential for early disease detection without going to the doctor. Eos.ai What it does: Cleaning, compressing, and harmonizing of fragmented data stored in electronic medical records. Why it’s noteworthy: Standardizing medical data can help improve AI model performance. Food for Health What it does: Offers personalized food and grocery shopping guide. Why it’s noteworthy: The startup’s app helps consumers choose foods that support their specific health needs with scientific certainty. GLITCHERS Lab What it does: Uses video games to collect brain data for health research, especially for Alzheimer’s. Why it’s noteworthy: Gamifying cognitive testing to create a large dataset. Innov8 AI What it does: Uses AI to analyze social media and flag disruptive key narratives. Why it’s noteworthy: The tool helps companies quickly notice unfavorable sentiment and reputation risks about their brand. Lexi AI What it does: Provides a multilingual, AI-powered medical interpretation. Why it’s noteworthy: Fast and cost-efficient medical translations can save lives. MariTest What it does: Developing a bloodless, rapid diagnostic tool for the early detection and treatment of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Why it’s noteworthy: Its bloodless technology removes the reliance on medical technicians, accelerating diagnosis in rural areas. Meo Health What it does: A tech-enabled recovery program for people suffering from long Covid. Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s drug-free approach has been clinically proven to improve patients’ symptoms. Monere What it does: An AI-powered platform that uses a smartphone camera to analyze a user’s eyelid to monitor and reduce the risk of anemia and iron deficiency. Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s noninvasive test claims to easily and quickly catch anemia. Near Wave What it does: This startup’s noninvasive, handheld device claims to be able to measure oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentrations. Why it’s noteworthy: This is a less painful and faster way to collect some of the vital biomarkers. Neural Drive What it does: Developing a noninvasive brain-computer interface that allows paralyzed patients to instantly communicate essential and custom messages via a “blink-to-speak” function. Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike invasive devices, it can restore communication for paralyzed patients quickly and cost-effectively. NUSEUM What it does: A B2B precision nutrition AI platform that converts an individual’s complex health data into evidence-based food, grocery, and recipe recommendations. Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s recommendations can help food delivery, e-commerce, diagnostic, health, and insurance sector clients offer better food choices to ultimate customers. Ovulio Corp. What it does: Saliva-based hormone monitor for helping manage fertility, menopause, and medical conditions like PCOS. Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike alternatives, the noninvasive device is reusable. Pharos What it does: Automates the extraction of patient safety data from medical records for reporting to regulatory agencies. Why it’s noteworthy: By using AI, Pharos helps free up clinical staff time while simultaneously preventing patient deaths and harm. PillarBiome What it does: Uses AI to deliver personalized, science-backed health recommendations by analyzing your gut microbiome data. Why it’s noteworthy: The microbiome is full of rich data that could provide insights into personalized dietary recommendations for better health. RADiCAIT What it does: This Oxford spinout uses AI to transform routine CT scans into PET-like scans, bypassing the need for scarce, costly PET imaging. Why it’s noteworthy: Obtaining PET-level insights from a regular CT scan is much faster and cheaper. Serene Sleep What it does: A simple, minimally invasive procedure to permanently stop snoring and treat sleep apnea. Why it’s noteworthy: Tackles the widespread problem of snoring and sleep apnea, a condition that could otherwise require the use of bulky devices like CPAP masks. Some Other Place What it does: This startup, which recently rebranded as Hug, connects users with trained, empathetic human listeners for real-time peer support. Why it’s noteworthy: People often feel better after they share worries and emotional burdens without judgment. SpotitEarly What it does: An at-home cancer breath test that uses AI technology and trained dogs to sniff out multiple early-stage cancers from compounds in a patient’s breath sample. Why it’s noteworthy: Based on studies showing that dogs can use their strong sense of smell to detect cancer, this startup is creating a novel method to integrate that unique ability into an early-detection diagnostic. Sybil Health What it does: Offers science-backed, holistic therapies, alongside lifestyle adjustments, to help women manage hormonal changes during menopause. Why it’s noteworthy: Consults women how to control menopausal symptoms with hormones or through complementary alternative and naturopathic therapies. Vital Audio What it does: Uses bioacoustics technology to capture vital signs like heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory metrics from short voice samples. Why it’s noteworthy: Enables health systems to monitor thousands of patients, especially ones in remote regions. VIZQ Technologies What it does: Uses AI- and VR-powered technology to make speech and language therapy for children more accessible. Why it’s noteworthy: Helps bridge the gap created by the shortage of speech therapists. Vocadian What it does: Uses voice AI to diagnose fatigue in the frontline workforce. Why it’s noteworthy: The company’s technology could increase productivity and help prevent accidents. Yuzi Care What it does: Matches families with birth and postpartum doulas and care providers. Why it’s noteworthy: Part of a wave of digital maternal health and postpartum startups. Zemi Labs What it does: Develops “smart clothing” for athletes that can capture and analyze heart, muscle, skin, and movements of athletes. Why it’s noteworthy: Unlike wearable devices, Zemi’s clothing captures a broad range of biosignals, which could ultimately help performance.","createTime":"1766939280597","detailId":"4041917","id":"4041917","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1766939234000","originUrl":"https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/28/the-33-top-health-and-wellness-startups-from-disrupt-startup-battlefield/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":296,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,CLOUD,W","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1766939234000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/cfe162fef73d2e018d93ed311c178bb6.jpeg","sourceName":"TechCrunch","title":"The 33 top health and wellness startups from Disrupt Startup Battlefield","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
As the cryptocurrency market evolves beyond its initial hype cycles, established projects like EOS face a critical juncture. This analysis provides a data-driven EOS price prediction for 2026 through 2030, examining whether its extensive technical foundation can finally catalyze significant market movement. We will dissect network developments, macroeconomic factors, and comparative blockchain metrics to build a comprehensive forecast.
\n
EOS Price Prediction: Foundation and Current Context
\n
Launched in 2018 after a record-breaking initial coin offering, EOS promised a high-performance blockchain for decentralized applications. However, its price trajectory has remained relatively stagnant for several years, especially when compared to broader market rallies. Consequently, any meaningful EOS price prediction must first ground itself in the project’s fundamental evolution. The transition of governance to the EOS Network Foundation (ENF) in 2021 marked a pivotal shift towards community-led development. Furthermore, the implementation of the Antelope protocol stack and significant upgrades like the Mandel 3.1 consensus hard fork have substantially improved network performance and developer incentives. These technical milestones form the bedrock for our forward-looking analysis, separating speculative chatter from infrastructure-based assessment.
\n
Technical Analysis and Historical Price Patterns
\n
Analyzing historical data reveals distinct phases for EOS. The 2018 launch saw rapid appreciation followed by a prolonged consolidation period. Price action has frequently correlated with Bitcoin’s market cycles but with diminishing volatility amplitude over time. Key resistance and support levels established over multiple years provide critical technical markers for future movement. On-chain metrics, including active address counts and transaction volume, offer additional layers of insight beyond simple price charts. For instance, sustained growth in network utility often precedes price discovery phases in blockchain assets. Therefore, monitoring developer activity and dApp deployment on the EOS network becomes as crucial as tracking trading volume.
\n
Expert Perspectives on Network Utility and Adoption
\n
Industry analysts emphasize that long-term value accrual in blockchain stems from sustainable use cases. Reports from entities like Messari and CoinMetrics consistently track the health of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible token (NFT) ecosystems on various platforms. For EOS, the growth of its DeFi total value locked (TVL) and the activity on NFT marketplaces provide quantifiable measures of adoption. Experts like those at the ENF point to the network’s high throughput and negligible transaction fees as structural advantages for application developers. The real-world adoption of these features by enterprises and independent developers will be the primary driver influencing any EOS price prediction for the latter half of the decade.
\n
Macroeconomic and Regulatory Factors for 2026-2030
\n
No cryptocurrency operates in a vacuum. Broader financial conditions, including interest rate policies from major central banks and global liquidity measures, profoundly impact risk asset valuations. The regulatory landscape for digital assets is also crystallizing across major jurisdictions like the United States, the European Union under MiCA, and parts of Asia. Clear, constructive regulation could provide a significant tailwind for compliant, established layer-1 networks like EOS. Conversely, restrictive policies could hinder growth. Furthermore, the integration of blockchain technology into traditional finance (TradFi) and the potential for institutional investment via vehicles like spot ETFs for assets beyond Bitcoin could redirect capital flows. These macro forces will interact directly with EOS’s technical progress to shape its market position.
\n
Comparative Analysis with Competing Layer-1 Blockchains
\n
A realistic EOS price prediction requires benchmarking against its peers. The layer-1 blockchain space is intensely competitive, with networks like Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Avalanche all vying for developers and users. The table below summarizes key comparative metrics that influence investor and developer allocation decisions.
\n
\n Blockchain \n
\n
\n Key Focus \n
\n
\n Transaction Finality \n
\n
\n Approx. Fees \n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n
\n
EOS
\n
High-throughput dApps
\n
~3 seconds
\n
Negligible
\n
\n
\n
Ethereum
\n
Decentralization & Security
\n
~15 seconds
\n
Variable, often high
\n
\n
\n
Solana
\n
Ultra-high speed
\n
~0.4 seconds
\n
Very low
\n
\n
\n
Avalanche
\n
Custom subnetworks
\n
~2 seconds
\n
Low
\n
\n \n
\n
EOS’s value proposition hinges on its consistent performance and cost structure. Its challenge lies in marketing these advantages and fostering a vibrant ecosystem that leverages them, moving beyond pure technical specifications to tangible user benefits.
Based on the synthesis of technical development, adoption metrics, and market environment, we outline potential scenarios. These are not financial advice but models based on observed growth patterns in blockchain networks.
\n
\n
2026: This period could see the maturation of current ENF-led initiatives. Price action may remain range-bound unless a major dApp achieves breakout adoption, serving as a catalyst.
\n
2027-2028: Broader crypto market cycles, potentially aligned with Bitcoin’s halving rhythm, may lift all boats. EOS’s price could test previous all-time highs if its ecosystem growth outpaces the market average during this phase.
\n
2029-2030: The long-term horizon depends on sustained utility. Success in key verticals like gaming, enterprise supply chains, or digital identity could establish a new, higher valuation floor. Failure to capture meaningful market share could result in continued consolidation.
\n
\n
Critical variables to watch include the network’s developer growth rate, the TVL in its DeFi protocols, and partnerships that drive real-world transactions. These indicators will provide early signals confirming or contradicting these scenario pathways.
\n
Conclusion
\n
The path for EOS between 2026 and 2030 is not predetermined. Our EOS price prediction analysis underscores that its potential hinges on converting robust technical infrastructure into undeniable ecosystem growth. The network possesses the foundational elements—speed, low cost, and renewed governance—required for success. However, the blockchain landscape is a marketplace of attention and innovation. Therefore, breaking its long silence in the markets will ultimately depend on the network’s ability to attract and retain developers who build applications that attract and retain users. The coming years will be a definitive test of whether EOS can translate its latent potential into realized value.
\n
FAQs
\n
Q1: What is the main factor that could positively impact the EOS price by 2030? The single largest positive factor would be the emergence of a “killer application”—a widely adopted dApp built exclusively on EOS that drives significant, sustained network usage and demand for the EOS token.
\n
Q2: How does EOS’s technology compare to Ethereum for future growth? EOS offers significantly higher transactions per second and lower fees, which is advantageous for user-facing applications. Ethereum prioritizes maximal decentralization and security, fostering a larger developer community and total value locked. Growth depends on which attributes the market values more for specific use cases.
\n
Q3: Is EOS considered a good long-term investment? As a journalistic analysis, we do not provide investment advice. EOS is a high-risk, high-potential-reward asset within the volatile cryptocurrency sector. Its long-term viability depends entirely on adoption and execution, not just its technology.
\n
Q4: What are the biggest risks to this EOS price prediction? Key risks include intensified competition from other layer-1 or layer-2 blockchains, failure to grow its developer ecosystem, adverse global cryptocurrency regulations, and broader macroeconomic downturns that reduce investment in risk assets.
\n
Q5: Where can I find reliable data on EOS network activity? Independent blockchain analytics platforms like Messari, CoinMetrics, and TokenTerminal provide verifiable data on metrics such as daily active addresses, transaction counts, developer activity, and total value locked in DeFi protocols on the EOS network.
\n
","contentId":"12560605123506","contentText":"As the cryptocurrency market evolves beyond its initial hype cycles, established projects like EOS face a critical juncture. This analysis provides a data-driven EOS price prediction for 2026 through 2030, examining whether its extensive technical foundation can finally catalyze significant market movement. We will dissect network developments, macroeconomic factors, and comparative blockchain metrics to build a comprehensive forecast. EOS Price Prediction: Foundation and Current Context Launched in 2018 after a record-breaking initial coin offering, EOS promised a high-performance blockchain for decentralized applications. However, its price trajectory has remained relatively stagnant for several years, especially when compared to broader market rallies. Consequently, any meaningful EOS price prediction must first ground itself in the project’s fundamental evolution. The transition of governance to the EOS Network Foundation (ENF) in 2021 marked a pivotal shift towards community-led development. Furthermore, the implementation of the Antelope protocol stack and significant upgrades like the Mandel 3.1 consensus hard fork have substantially improved network performance and developer incentives. These technical milestones form the bedrock for our forward-looking analysis, separating speculative chatter from infrastructure-based assessment. Technical Analysis and Historical Price Patterns Analyzing historical data reveals distinct phases for EOS. The 2018 launch saw rapid appreciation followed by a prolonged consolidation period. Price action has frequently correlated with Bitcoin’s market cycles but with diminishing volatility amplitude over time. Key resistance and support levels established over multiple years provide critical technical markers for future movement. On-chain metrics, including active address counts and transaction volume, offer additional layers of insight beyond simple price charts. For instance, sustained growth in network utility often precedes price discovery phases in blockchain assets. Therefore, monitoring developer activity and dApp deployment on the EOS network becomes as crucial as tracking trading volume. Expert Perspectives on Network Utility and Adoption Industry analysts emphasize that long-term value accrual in blockchain stems from sustainable use cases. Reports from entities like Messari and CoinMetrics consistently track the health of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible token (NFT) ecosystems on various platforms. For EOS, the growth of its DeFi total value locked (TVL) and the activity on NFT marketplaces provide quantifiable measures of adoption. Experts like those at the ENF point to the network’s high throughput and negligible transaction fees as structural advantages for application developers. The real-world adoption of these features by enterprises and independent developers will be the primary driver influencing any EOS price prediction for the latter half of the decade. Macroeconomic and Regulatory Factors for 2026-2030 No cryptocurrency operates in a vacuum. Broader financial conditions, including interest rate policies from major central banks and global liquidity measures, profoundly impact risk asset valuations. The regulatory landscape for digital assets is also crystallizing across major jurisdictions like the United States, the European Union under MiCA, and parts of Asia. Clear, constructive regulation could provide a significant tailwind for compliant, established layer-1 networks like EOS. Conversely, restrictive policies could hinder growth. Furthermore, the integration of blockchain technology into traditional finance (TradFi) and the potential for institutional investment via vehicles like spot ETFs for assets beyond Bitcoin could redirect capital flows. These macro forces will interact directly with EOS’s technical progress to shape its market position. Comparative Analysis with Competing Layer-1 Blockchains A realistic EOS price prediction requires benchmarking against its peers. The layer-1 blockchain space is intensely competitive, with networks like Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Avalanche all vying for developers and users. The table below summarizes key comparative metrics that influence investor and developer allocation decisions. Blockchain Key Focus Transaction Finality Approx. Fees EOS High-throughput dApps ~3 seconds Negligible Ethereum Decentralization & Security ~15 seconds Variable, often high Solana Ultra-high speed ~0.4 seconds Very low Avalanche Custom subnetworks ~2 seconds Low EOS’s value proposition hinges on its consistent performance and cost structure. Its challenge lies in marketing these advantages and fostering a vibrant ecosystem that leverages them, moving beyond pure technical specifications to tangible user benefits. Scenario-Based Price Forecasts: 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030 Based on the synthesis of technical development, adoption metrics, and market environment, we outline potential scenarios. These are not financial advice but models based on observed growth patterns in blockchain networks. 2026: This period could see the maturation of current ENF-led initiatives. Price action may remain range-bound unless a major dApp achieves breakout adoption, serving as a catalyst. 2027-2028: Broader crypto market cycles, potentially aligned with Bitcoin’s halving rhythm, may lift all boats. EOS’s price could test previous all-time highs if its ecosystem growth outpaces the market average during this phase. 2029-2030: The long-term horizon depends on sustained utility. Success in key verticals like gaming, enterprise supply chains, or digital identity could establish a new, higher valuation floor. Failure to capture meaningful market share could result in continued consolidation. Critical variables to watch include the network’s developer growth rate, the TVL in its DeFi protocols, and partnerships that drive real-world transactions. These indicators will provide early signals confirming or contradicting these scenario pathways. Conclusion The path for EOS between 2026 and 2030 is not predetermined. Our EOS price prediction analysis underscores that its potential hinges on converting robust technical infrastructure into undeniable ecosystem growth. The network possesses the foundational elements—speed, low cost, and renewed governance—required for success. However, the blockchain landscape is a marketplace of attention and innovation. Therefore, breaking its long silence in the markets will ultimately depend on the network’s ability to attract and retain developers who build applications that attract and retain users. The coming years will be a definitive test of whether EOS can translate its latent potential into realized value. FAQs Q1: What is the main factor that could positively impact the EOS price by 2030? The single largest positive factor would be the emergence of a “killer application”—a widely adopted dApp built exclusively on EOS that drives significant, sustained network usage and demand for the EOS token. Q2: How does EOS’s technology compare to Ethereum for future growth? EOS offers significantly higher transactions per second and lower fees, which is advantageous for user-facing applications. Ethereum prioritizes maximal decentralization and security, fostering a larger developer community and total value locked. Growth depends on which attributes the market values more for specific use cases. Q3: Is EOS considered a good long-term investment? As a journalistic analysis, we do not provide investment advice. EOS is a high-risk, high-potential-reward asset within the volatile cryptocurrency sector. Its long-term viability depends entirely on adoption and execution, not just its technology. Q4: What are the biggest risks to this EOS price prediction? Key risks include intensified competition from other layer-1 or layer-2 blockchains, failure to grow its developer ecosystem, adverse global cryptocurrency regulations, and broader macroeconomic downturns that reduce investment in risk assets. Q5: Where can I find reliable data on EOS network activity? Independent blockchain analytics platforms like Messari, CoinMetrics, and TokenTerminal provide verifiable data on metrics such as daily active addresses, transaction counts, developer activity, and total value locked in DeFi protocols on the EOS network.","createTime":"1766754480301","detailId":"4031521","id":"4031521","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1766754381000","originUrl":"https://bitcoinworld.co.in/eos-price-prediction-2026-2030/","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":709,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,ETH","retweetsCount":"1","retweetsCountV2":1,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1766754381000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/f60eef41da81d31105d5aeab1d02b3b11766754381407.webp","sourceName":"Bitcoinworld","title":"EOS Price Prediction 2026-2030: The Critical Path to Breaking Its Long Silence","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"The collapse of Vaulta is not only a tragedy for EOS, but also a reflection of the shattered ideals of Web3.","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Original Title: Vaulta Foundation \"Monopoly\" Record: Token Price Plummets, Audit Disappears, Community Trust Completely Collapses
Original Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member
Original Editor: Rhythm Worker, Rhythm BlockBeats
Editor's Note:
Many people know about EOS, the early public chain that raised $4.2 billions seven years ago and was regarded as the earliest \"Ethereum killer.\" But what many don't know is that after BM was squeezed out of EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted its focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish.
The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, with CEO Yves La Rose, who was nicknamed \"the Bearded One\" by the community due to his thick beard. Later, under his leadership, EOS was renamed Vaulta and pivoted to Web3 banking, and the EOS Network Foundation was also renamed the Vaulta Foundation. However, the recent sudden resignation of the Bearded One has caused community dissatisfaction and sparked accusations about his past actions.
The Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation) is experiencing an unprecedented collapse in trust: tens of millions of dollars burned over four years, yet the token price keeps hitting new lows; projects fail one after another, the ledger went from public to discontinued; management \"resigned gracefully,\" but permissions have yet to be handed over... This article will unveil the mysteries of Vaulta and tell the story of a monopoly.
Yves Resignation: Graceful Exit or Behind-the-Scenes Manipulation?
On November 12, 2025, the former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation, hereinafter referred to as VF), Yves La Rose, suddenly announced his resignation on X, stating that he had notified the network's 21 block producers on October 29 (UTC+8) of his intention to step down and would elect a new representative through on-chain governance. The statement was polite, full of \"gratitude\" and \"vision,\" but four weeks later, the community was shocked to discover that the core multi-signature accounts of Vaulta were still controlled by Yves, with no handover at all.
Yves' personal resignation statement
Moreover, after resigning, Yves secretly pushed for Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. The first thing Aaron did after being put in the spotlight was to initiate a massive proposal of 10 million $A (EOS) to continue paying the core development budget. This move sparked widespread skepticism in the community: this was simply using a figurehead to \"extend life\" and transfer the remaining public funds.
Charge 1: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenses Shrouded in Mystery
Since VF was established in 2021, the ecosystem has not accelerated as time progressed.
On the contrary, the community has seen another disturbing trend: the budget expands year by year, but results shrink year by year.
VF, under the banner of \"ecosystem revitalization,\" launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023. VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, and they did make efforts in brand operations and international events.
But the key question is—what did these lavish investments actually bring?
According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) alone reached: $1,709,800 in Q4 2022 for marketing; another $1,072,887 in Q1 2023.
In just six months, nearly $2.8 million was spent on brand promotion and PR activities. However, the only visible results for the community were: number of conference attendances, photos and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2,000 days of zero downtime; EVM performance stress tests;
These data are not meaningless, but they are more like PR slides than a true reflection of the ecosystem. Developer growth? None. Daily on-chain activity? Not disclosed. TVL? Almost none. Why does increased spending lead to lower community awareness? When all reports only talk about \"highlights\" and not \"results,\" transparency naturally slips into a black box.
Charge 2: Immediate Payouts Upon Taking Office, Greymass's $5 Million Budget Under Constant Controversy
In June 2024, VF allocated 15 million $A (EOS) to establish a \"middleware special fund,\" with the first batch of 5 million $A (EOS) given to the Greymass team, and the remaining 10 million still in the eosio.mware account.
On-chain data shows: funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to Greymass's newly established account uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to accounts with notes such as \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling \"salary payments\"; then from there to other accounts, eventually distributed to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, etc., with transfer records noting \"Reward Payout + USD amount\"; most recipient accounts quickly transferred the funds to krakenkraken or exchanges like Coinbase for cash out.
rewards.gm on-chain transfer records (data source)
Additional note: The \"middleware\" built by Greymass refers to infrastructure tools that simplify account creation and interaction processes.
Although the Greymass team released several development updates at the beginning of the grant, there have been almost no technical achievements or interim summaries published in the past year. In particular, Greymass's middleware tools still have many technical issues in compatibility and stability and have not been widely adopted by mainstream developers.
The community's main concerns are: Is there double salary payment or unidentified accounts receiving salaries in the 5 million $A (EOS)? Was the fund allocation closely timed with Aaron's appointment, suggesting \"self-approved budget\"? Does the salary structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny Greymass's contributions to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. But has the new policy led them astray? Did they deviate from their development goals after losing supervision?
These questions remain unanswered.
What is certain is that the silence and low output of the \"Greymass $5 Million Project\" make it difficult to respond to the external trust crisis, further intensifying community doubts about the foundation's use of funds.
Charge 3: Token Price Plummets, Foundation \"Silent,\" Responsibility Becomes a Blind Spot
If technical results can be debated and marketing effects quantified, then token price is the most honest indicator.
This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted all the way down, hitting a low of $0.21—a dangerous signal that would put any ecosystem on red alert. Yet, when the community kept asking, the foundation's response was always: \"Token price is not within the foundation's scope of responsibility.\"
This statement itself is irrefutable.
Technical organizations are not obliged to manipulate the market. But the contradiction is—when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence collapses, the foundation has no discussion of \"stabilizing expectations\" or \"support mechanisms.\"
What followed was even more disturbing: the foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap and no handover plan.
The community's concern is not whether the foundation should be responsible for the token price, but: at a critical moment of trust crisis in the ecosystem, why choose to withdraw—was it inability, indifference, or were there issues that could not be faced? Responsibility vanished in this crash.
Charge 4: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Disappears Quietly
When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point.
2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), real-time progress reports to the community;
2022: Monthly reports (Monthly Yield Report), a few months of slack but still acceptable;
2023: Quarterly reports (ENF Quarterly report)
2024: Silence... ...
2025: Silence... ...
From the published report data, VF's highest expenditure was in Q4 2022, reaching $7,885,340; after that, quarterly expenditures gradually declined.
However, these reports usually only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categories and breakdowns, making it difficult for outsiders to determine where the funds went. The community has long been suspicious of the huge expenditures and lack of transparency.
The reports repeatedly mention Grant Framework and Pomelo and other plans, but these were \"suspended\" in 2023; meanwhile, the white paper's promised dedicated fund management for specific projects was neither executed in detail nor publicly settled, and the destination of funds after entering exchanges remains a mystery.
This break in transparency, combined with years of extravagance, ultimately led community confidence to hit rock bottom.
From frequent disclosures to gradually sparse, and now to complete silence, the disappearance of transparency almost perfectly mirrors the decline in ecosystem activity.
What's more noteworthy: since Q1 2024, no financial reports have been released. No financial audits, no budget distribution, no project list, no unsettled grants.
The community is forced to accept a fact: the foundation's operations have gone from \"high-frequency transparency\" to \"complete black box.\"
Meanwhile, many of the high-profile partnerships VF once promoted mostly stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking actual implementation. The once-promised \"transparent operations\" ultimately became a silent cliff.
Charge 5: Arbitrary Grants, Grants Become a \"Black Hole,\" No One Knows Where the Money Went
Looking back at the early days of the foundation, VF did try to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various funding programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and the public funding pool used with Pomelo.
At that stage, funds were distributed quickly and on a large scale, aiming to \"stop the bleeding quickly.\"
We cannot deny that it did boost morale in the early days.
Here's a supplementary explanation of Grants: VF's grants are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based grants) for individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (rewards for projects); and public funding channels like Pomelo for ecosystem projects. Grants can be used for both for-profit and public goods/nonprofit projects.
For example—in the first report for Q4 2021, VF made a one-time allocation of:
$3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project);
$1.3 million to fund five technical working groups to write blue papers;
$1.265 million to support the community autonomous organization EdenOnEOS;
$500,000 as the first season Pomelo funding pool;
However, the problem is—this was also the only quarter in the next four years where VF fully disclosed the grant recipients.
From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants remained the largest item in quarterly expenditures (in some quarters accounting for 40%~60% of total spending), the reports: no longer disclosed specific grant recipients; did not disclose the actual amount received by each project; did not disclose project acceptance status; did not mention details of fund usage; did not state whether projects delivered results according to milestones;
In other words, the numbers remain, but the information is gone.
Only the first season report disclosed the fund flows for each project. In the following eight reports, Grants remained the \"largest item,\" but no longer explained which projects or results benefited.
The amount spent is visible, but where the money went is forever unknown.
Did the grants really promote the ecosystem? Were the funds used effectively? Were the projects delivered? Why did the foundation never disclose more information?
It inevitably raises doubts: did the foundation use the banner of \"ecosystem funding\" to distribute large sums from the start? Externally, it bought off the community and won hearts; internally, it sat on inflationary funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight.
VF's matching pool exceeded $10 million, but most projects had extremely sparse updates, and some disappeared after receiving funds.
The End of Another Era
The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach, but over the past four years has gradually moved toward opacity and corruption.
From Yves's graceful resignation without handing over power, to the unaccountable $5 million $A (EOS) middleware grant, from millions in quarterly marketing expenses with no effect, to ecosystem grants with no follow-up—this is not the failure of \"decentralized governance,\" but the victory of \"centralized plunder.\"
This long article is a list of charges, but also a warning document.
The collapse of Vaulta is not only a tragedy for EOS, but also a microcosm of the trampling of Web3 ideals.
Recommended Reading:
Rewriting the 2018 script: Will the end of the US government shutdown = a bitcoin price surge?
$1.1 billions stablecoins evaporated, what's the truth behind the DeFi domino crash?
MMT short squeeze review: a carefully designed money-grabbing game
","contentId":"12560605084551","contentText":"Original Title: Vaulta Foundation \"Monopoly\" Record: Token Price Plummets, Audit Disappears, Community Trust Completely Collapses Original Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member Original Editor: Rhythm Worker, Rhythm BlockBeats Editor's Note: Many people know about EOS, the early public chain that raised $4.2 billions seven years ago and was regarded as the earliest \"Ethereum killer.\" But what many don't know is that after BM was squeezed out of EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted its focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish. The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, with CEO Yves La Rose, who was nicknamed \"the Bearded One\" by the community due to his thick beard. Later, under his leadership, EOS was renamed Vaulta and pivoted to Web3 banking, and the EOS Network Foundation was also renamed the Vaulta Foundation. However, the recent sudden resignation of the Bearded One has caused community dissatisfaction and sparked accusations about his past actions. The Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation) is experiencing an unprecedented collapse in trust: tens of millions of dollars burned over four years, yet the token price keeps hitting new lows; projects fail one after another, the ledger went from public to discontinued; management \"resigned gracefully,\" but permissions have yet to be handed over... This article will unveil the mysteries of Vaulta and tell the story of a monopoly. Yves Resignation: Graceful Exit or Behind-the-Scenes Manipulation? On November 12, 2025, the former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation, hereinafter referred to as VF), Yves La Rose, suddenly announced his resignation on X, stating that he had notified the network's 21 block producers on October 29 (UTC+8) of his intention to step down and would elect a new representative through on-chain governance. The statement was polite, full of \"gratitude\" and \"vision,\" but four weeks later, the community was shocked to discover that the core multi-signature accounts of Vaulta were still controlled by Yves, with no handover at all. Yves' personal resignation statement Moreover, after resigning, Yves secretly pushed for Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. The first thing Aaron did after being put in the spotlight was to initiate a massive proposal of 10 million $A (EOS) to continue paying the core development budget. This move sparked widespread skepticism in the community: this was simply using a figurehead to \"extend life\" and transfer the remaining public funds. Charge 1: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenses Shrouded in Mystery Since VF was established in 2021, the ecosystem has not accelerated as time progressed. On the contrary, the community has seen another disturbing trend: the budget expands year by year, but results shrink year by year. VF, under the banner of \"ecosystem revitalization,\" launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023. VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, and they did make efforts in brand operations and international events. But the key question is—what did these lavish investments actually bring? According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) alone reached: $1,709,800 in Q4 2022 for marketing; another $1,072,887 in Q1 2023. In just six months, nearly $2.8 million was spent on brand promotion and PR activities. However, the only visible results for the community were: number of conference attendances, photos and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2,000 days of zero downtime; EVM performance stress tests; These data are not meaningless, but they are more like PR slides than a true reflection of the ecosystem. Developer growth? None. Daily on-chain activity? Not disclosed. TVL? Almost none. Why does increased spending lead to lower community awareness? When all reports only talk about \"highlights\" and not \"results,\" transparency naturally slips into a black box. Charge 2: Immediate Payouts Upon Taking Office, Greymass's $5 Million Budget Under Constant Controversy In June 2024, VF allocated 15 million $A (EOS) to establish a \"middleware special fund,\" with the first batch of 5 million $A (EOS) given to the Greymass team, and the remaining 10 million still in the eosio.mware account. On-chain data shows: funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to Greymass's newly established account uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to accounts with notes such as \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling \"salary payments\"; then from there to other accounts, eventually distributed to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, etc., with transfer records noting \"Reward Payout + USD amount\"; most recipient accounts quickly transferred the funds to krakenkraken or exchanges like Coinbase for cash out. rewards.gm on-chain transfer records (data source) Additional note: The \"middleware\" built by Greymass refers to infrastructure tools that simplify account creation and interaction processes. Although the Greymass team released several development updates at the beginning of the grant, there have been almost no technical achievements or interim summaries published in the past year. In particular, Greymass's middleware tools still have many technical issues in compatibility and stability and have not been widely adopted by mainstream developers. The community's main concerns are: Is there double salary payment or unidentified accounts receiving salaries in the 5 million $A (EOS)? Was the fund allocation closely timed with Aaron's appointment, suggesting \"self-approved budget\"? Does the salary structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny Greymass's contributions to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. But has the new policy led them astray? Did they deviate from their development goals after losing supervision? These questions remain unanswered. What is certain is that the silence and low output of the \"Greymass $5 Million Project\" make it difficult to respond to the external trust crisis, further intensifying community doubts about the foundation's use of funds. Charge 3: Token Price Plummets, Foundation \"Silent,\" Responsibility Becomes a Blind Spot If technical results can be debated and marketing effects quantified, then token price is the most honest indicator. This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted all the way down, hitting a low of $0.21—a dangerous signal that would put any ecosystem on red alert. Yet, when the community kept asking, the foundation's response was always: \"Token price is not within the foundation's scope of responsibility.\" This statement itself is irrefutable. Technical organizations are not obliged to manipulate the market. But the contradiction is—when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence collapses, the foundation has no discussion of \"stabilizing expectations\" or \"support mechanisms.\" What followed was even more disturbing: the foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap and no handover plan. The community's concern is not whether the foundation should be responsible for the token price, but: at a critical moment of trust crisis in the ecosystem, why choose to withdraw—was it inability, indifference, or were there issues that could not be faced? Responsibility vanished in this crash. Charge 4: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Disappears Quietly When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point. 2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), real-time progress reports to the community; 2022: Monthly reports (Monthly Yield Report), a few months of slack but still acceptable; 2023: Quarterly reports (ENF Quarterly report) 2024: Silence... ... 2025: Silence... ... From the published report data, VF's highest expenditure was in Q4 2022, reaching $7,885,340; after that, quarterly expenditures gradually declined. However, these reports usually only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categories and breakdowns, making it difficult for outsiders to determine where the funds went. The community has long been suspicious of the huge expenditures and lack of transparency. The reports repeatedly mention Grant Framework and Pomelo and other plans, but these were \"suspended\" in 2023; meanwhile, the white paper's promised dedicated fund management for specific projects was neither executed in detail nor publicly settled, and the destination of funds after entering exchanges remains a mystery. This break in transparency, combined with years of extravagance, ultimately led community confidence to hit rock bottom. From frequent disclosures to gradually sparse, and now to complete silence, the disappearance of transparency almost perfectly mirrors the decline in ecosystem activity. What's more noteworthy: since Q1 2024, no financial reports have been released. No financial audits, no budget distribution, no project list, no unsettled grants. The community is forced to accept a fact: the foundation's operations have gone from \"high-frequency transparency\" to \"complete black box.\" Meanwhile, many of the high-profile partnerships VF once promoted mostly stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking actual implementation. The once-promised \"transparent operations\" ultimately became a silent cliff. Charge 5: Arbitrary Grants, Grants Become a \"Black Hole,\" No One Knows Where the Money Went Looking back at the early days of the foundation, VF did try to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various funding programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and the public funding pool used with Pomelo. At that stage, funds were distributed quickly and on a large scale, aiming to \"stop the bleeding quickly.\" We cannot deny that it did boost morale in the early days. Here's a supplementary explanation of Grants: VF's grants are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based grants) for individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (rewards for projects); and public funding channels like Pomelo for ecosystem projects. Grants can be used for both for-profit and public goods/nonprofit projects. For example—in the first report for Q4 2021, VF made a one-time allocation of: $3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project); $1.3 million to fund five technical working groups to write blue papers; $1.265 million to support the community autonomous organization EdenOnEOS; $500,000 as the first season Pomelo funding pool; However, the problem is—this was also the only quarter in the next four years where VF fully disclosed the grant recipients. From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants remained the largest item in quarterly expenditures (in some quarters accounting for 40%~60% of total spending), the reports: no longer disclosed specific grant recipients; did not disclose the actual amount received by each project; did not disclose project acceptance status; did not mention details of fund usage; did not state whether projects delivered results according to milestones; In other words, the numbers remain, but the information is gone. Only the first season report disclosed the fund flows for each project. In the following eight reports, Grants remained the \"largest item,\" but no longer explained which projects or results benefited. The amount spent is visible, but where the money went is forever unknown. Did the grants really promote the ecosystem? Were the funds used effectively? Were the projects delivered? Why did the foundation never disclose more information? It inevitably raises doubts: did the foundation use the banner of \"ecosystem funding\" to distribute large sums from the start? Externally, it bought off the community and won hearts; internally, it sat on inflationary funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight. VF's matching pool exceeded $10 million, but most projects had extremely sparse updates, and some disappeared after receiving funds. The End of Another Era The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach, but over the past four years has gradually moved toward opacity and corruption. From Yves's graceful resignation without handing over power, to the unaccountable $5 million $A (EOS) middleware grant, from millions in quarterly marketing expenses with no effect, to ecosystem grants with no follow-up—this is not the failure of \"decentralized governance,\" but the victory of \"centralized plunder.\" This long article is a list of charges, but also a warning document. The collapse of Vaulta is not only a tragedy for EOS, but also a microcosm of the trampling of Web3 ideals. Recommended Reading: Rewriting the 2018 script: Will the end of the US government shutdown = a bitcoin price surge? $1.1 billions stablecoins evaporated, what's the truth behind the DeFi domino crash? MMT short squeeze review: a carefully designed money-grabbing game","createTime":"1764198867671","detailId":"3802155","id":"3802155","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/56263ca83b9e6702563a8c541e6329e71764171542440.webp,https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/70cfb79597f9ff761ea3af3ea58e403a1764171542251.webp","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"原文标题：Vaulta 基金会「吃绝户」实录：币价暴跌、审计消失、社区信任全面崩塌","originPublishTime":"1764198867671","originUrl":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/article/2224134","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/b09a381a6ce23e05a439f227ba8c79c61764177303215.webp","readCount":1106,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,USD","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1764198867671","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/7ed16c1fc6004e51df34072e712e690a.jpeg","sourceName":"Chaincatcher","title":"EOS faces renewed turmoil as the community accuses the Foundation of running away with the funds","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"Big spending: Where has all the foundation's money gone?","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Original Title: \"Vaulta Foundation's 'Inheritance Grab' Exposé: Token Price Plunge, Audit Disappearance, and Total Collapse of Community Trust\"
Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member
Editor: Rhythm Junior, Rhythm BlockBeats
Editor's Note:
Many people know about EOS, the early public chain that raised a staggering $4.2 billion seven years ago and was once hailed as the earliest \"Ethereum killer.\" However, what many don't know is that after BM was pushed out of EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted its focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish.
The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, with CEO Yves La Rose, nicknamed \"The Bearded One\" by the community due to his thick beard. Under his leadership, EOS was rebranded as Vaulta and pivoted toward Web3 banking, with the EOS Network Foundation also renamed the Vaulta Foundation. However, the recent sudden resignation of The Bearded One has sparked community outrage and accusations regarding his past actions.
The Vaulta Foundation (formerly the EOS Network Foundation) is experiencing an unprecedented collapse of trust: tens of millions of dollars burned over four years, yet the token price keeps hitting new lows; projects fail one after another, the ledger went from public to discontinued; management \"resigned gracefully,\" but permissions have yet to be handed over... This article will reveal the many mysteries of Vaulta and tell the story of an \"inheritance grab.\"
Yves Resigns: Graceful Exit or Pulling Strings from Behind the Curtain?
On November 12, 2025, Yves La Rose, former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly the EOS Network Foundation, hereafter referred to as VF), suddenly announced his resignation on X, stating that he had notified the network's 21 block producers on October 29 that he would voluntarily step down and that a new representative would be elected via on-chain governance. The statement was dignified, full of \"gratitude\" and \"vision,\" but four weeks later, the community was shocked to discover that the core multi-signature accounts of Vaulta were still controlled by Yves, with no handover at all.
Yves' personal resignation statement
Moreover, after resigning, Yves secretly pushed for Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. The first thing Aaron did after being put in the spotlight was to propose a massive 10 million $A (EOS) allocation to continue funding core development. This move sparked widespread skepticism in the community: it seemed like a mere figurehead change to \"extend the project's life\" and transfer the remaining public funds.
Charge 1: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenses Shrouded in Mystery
Since VF was established in 2021, ecosystem development has not accelerated over time.
On the contrary, the community has witnessed another worrying trend: the budget has expanded year by year, while results have diminished.
VF launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023 under the banner of \"ecosystem revitalization.\" VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, who made efforts in brand operations and international events.
But the key question is—what did all this lavish spending actually achieve?
According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) alone reached: $1,709,800 in Q4 2022 for market promotion; another $1,072,887 in Q1 2023.
In just six months, nearly $2.8 million was poured into brand promotion and PR activities. Yet, the only visible results for the community were: number of conference attendances, photos and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2,000 days of zero downtime; EVM performance stress tests;
These figures are not meaningless, but they resemble PR slides more than a true reflection of the ecosystem. Developer growth? None. Daily on-chain activity? Not disclosed. TVL? Almost nonexistent. Why does increased spending lead to lower community awareness? When all reports only mention \"highlights\" and not \"outcomes,\" transparency naturally slides into a black box.
Charge 2: Immediate Payouts, Ongoing Controversy Over Greymass's $5 Million Budget
In June 2024, VF allocated 15 million $A (EOS) to establish a \"middleware special fund,\" with the first 5 million $A (EOS) granted to the Greymass team, and the remaining 10 million still in the eosio.mware account.
On-chain data shows: funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to Greymass's newly created account uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to accounts with notes like \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling \"salary payments\"; then, transfers were made from these accounts to others, eventually distributed to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, etc., with transfer records noting \"Reward Payout+USD amount\"; most recipient accounts quickly transferred funds to krakenkraken or exchanges like Coinbase for cash out after receiving payments.
rewards.gm on-chain transfer records ( Data Source)
Additional note: The \"middleware\" built by Greymass refers to infrastructure tools that simplify account creation and interaction processes.
Although the Greymass team released several development updates at the start of the grant, there have been almost no technical results or interim summaries published in the past year. In particular, Greymass's middleware tools still face significant technical issues in compatibility and stability and have yet to be widely adopted by mainstream developers.
The community's main concerns are: Is there double salary payment or anonymous accounts receiving wages among the 5 million $A (EOS)? Was the fund allocation closely timed with Aaron's appointment, suggesting \"self-approved budgeting\"? Does the salary structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny Greymass's past contributions to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. But has the new policy led them astray? Did the lack of supervision cause them to deviate from their original development intent?
These questions remain unanswered.
What is certain is that the silence and low output of the \"Greymass $5 Million Project\" make it difficult to address the external trust crisis and further intensify community doubts about the foundation's rational use of funds.
Charge 3: Token Price Plunge, Foundation \"Silent,\" Responsibility Becomes a Blind Spot
If technical results can be debated and marketing effectiveness quantified, then token price is the most honest indicator.
This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted, hitting a low of $0.21—a red alert for any ecosystem. Yet, when the community repeatedly questioned the foundation, the response was always: \"Token price is not within the foundation's responsibilities.\"
This statement is irrefutable in itself.
Technical organizations are not obligated to manipulate the market. But the contradiction is—when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence is collapsing, the foundation has not discussed any \"expectation stabilization\" or \"support mechanisms.\"
What followed was even more unsettling: the foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap or handover plan.
The community's concern is not whether the foundation should be responsible for the token price, but: at a critical moment of trust crisis, why choose to withdraw—was it due to inability, indifference, or issues too difficult to face? Responsibility vanished amid the crash.
Charge 4: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Quietly Disappears
When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point.
2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), real-time progress reports to the community;
2022: Monthly Yield Report, with a few months of slack but still acceptable;
2023: Quarterly report (ENF Quarterly report)
2024: Silence... ...
2025: Silence... ...
From the published report data, VF's highest expenditure was in Q4 2022, reaching $7,885,340; subsequent quarterly expenditures gradually declined.
However, these reports usually only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categorization and breakdowns, making it difficult for outsiders to track fund flows. The community has long been concerned about the huge expenditures and lack of transparency.
The reports repeatedly mention Grant Framework and Pomelo plans, but these were \"suspended\" in 2023; meanwhile, the whitepaper's promise of dedicated fund management for specific projects was neither executed in detail nor publicly settled, and the destination of funds transferred to exchanges remains a mystery.
This breakdown in transparency, combined with years of lavish spending, ultimately drove community confidence to rock bottom.
From frequent disclosures to gradual sparsity, and now complete silence, the disappearance of transparency almost perfectly mirrors the ecosystem's decline.
Even more noteworthy: since Q1 2024, no financial reports have been released. No financial audits, no budget distribution, no project lists, no outstanding grants.
The community has been forced to accept a fact: the foundation's operations have shifted from \"high-frequency transparency\" to \"complete black box.\"
Meanwhile, most of the high-profile partnership projects VF once promoted stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking real implementation. The once-promised \"transparent operations\" ultimately became a silent cliff.
Charge 5: Arbitrary Grants, Grants Become a \"Black Hole,\" No One Knows Where the Money Went
Looking back at the foundation's early days, VF did attempt to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various funding programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and public funding pools in partnership with Pomelo.
At that stage, funds were distributed quickly and at scale, aiming to \"stop the bleeding fast.\"
We cannot deny that this did boost morale in the early days.
Here’s a supplementary explanation of Grants: VF grants are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based grants) for individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (project rewards); and public funding channels like Pomelo for ecosystem projects. Grants can be used for both profit-driven and public goods/charity projects.
For example—in the first report for Q4 2021, VF made one-time allocations of:
$3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project);
$1.3 million to fund five technical working groups to write blue papers;
$1.265 million to support the community autonomous organization EdenOnEOS;
$500,000 as the first Pomelo funding pool;
However, the problem is—this was the only quarter in the next four years where VF fully disclosed grant recipients.
From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants remained the largest quarterly expenditure (sometimes accounting for 40%~60% of total spending), the reports: no longer disclosed specific grant recipients; did not reveal the actual amounts received by each project; did not disclose project acceptance status; did not mention fund usage details; did not state whether projects delivered results according to milestones;
In other words, the numbers remained, but the information disappeared.
Only the first quarterly report disclosed the flow of funds for each project. In the following eight reports, Grants remained the \"largest chunk\" of spending, but no longer specified which projects or outcomes benefited.
The amount spent is visible, but where the money went is forever unknown.
Did the grants truly drive the ecosystem? Were the funds used effectively? Were the projects delivered? Why did the foundation never disclose more information?
It raises the suspicion: did the foundation use the banner of \"ecosystem funding\" from the start to distribute large sums? Outwardly, it was to win over the community; internally, it hoarded inflationary funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight.
VF's matching pool funds exceeded $10 million, but most projects provided extremely sparse updates, and some disappeared after receiving funds.
The End of Another Era
The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach, but over the past four years, it has gradually become closed and corrupt.
From Yves's graceful resignation without handing over power, to the unaccountable $5 million $A (EOS) middleware grant, from millions in quarterly marketing expenses with no results, to ecosystem grants that vanished without a trace—this is not a failure of \"decentralized governance,\" but a victory for \"centralized plunder.\"
This long article is a list of charges, but also a warning document.
The collapse of Vaulta is not only a tragedy for EOS, but also a microcosm of the trampling of Web3 ideals.
","contentId":"12560605083300","contentText":"Original Title: \"Vaulta Foundation's 'Inheritance Grab' Exposé: Token Price Plunge, Audit Disappearance, and Total Collapse of Community Trust\" Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member Editor: Rhythm Junior, Rhythm BlockBeats Editor's Note: Many people know about EOS, the early public chain that raised a staggering $4.2 billion seven years ago and was once hailed as the earliest \"Ethereum killer.\" However, what many don't know is that after BM was pushed out of EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted its focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish. The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, with CEO Yves La Rose, nicknamed \"The Bearded One\" by the community due to his thick beard. Under his leadership, EOS was rebranded as Vaulta and pivoted toward Web3 banking, with the EOS Network Foundation also renamed the Vaulta Foundation. However, the recent sudden resignation of The Bearded One has sparked community outrage and accusations regarding his past actions. The Vaulta Foundation (formerly the EOS Network Foundation) is experiencing an unprecedented collapse of trust: tens of millions of dollars burned over four years, yet the token price keeps hitting new lows; projects fail one after another, the ledger went from public to discontinued; management \"resigned gracefully,\" but permissions have yet to be handed over... This article will reveal the many mysteries of Vaulta and tell the story of an \"inheritance grab.\" Yves Resigns: Graceful Exit or Pulling Strings from Behind the Curtain? On November 12, 2025, Yves La Rose, former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly the EOS Network Foundation, hereafter referred to as VF), suddenly announced his resignation on X, stating that he had notified the network's 21 block producers on October 29 that he would voluntarily step down and that a new representative would be elected via on-chain governance. The statement was dignified, full of \"gratitude\" and \"vision,\" but four weeks later, the community was shocked to discover that the core multi-signature accounts of Vaulta were still controlled by Yves, with no handover at all. Yves' personal resignation statement Moreover, after resigning, Yves secretly pushed for Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. The first thing Aaron did after being put in the spotlight was to propose a massive 10 million $A (EOS) allocation to continue funding core development. This move sparked widespread skepticism in the community: it seemed like a mere figurehead change to \"extend the project's life\" and transfer the remaining public funds. Charge 1: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenses Shrouded in Mystery Since VF was established in 2021, ecosystem development has not accelerated over time. On the contrary, the community has witnessed another worrying trend: the budget has expanded year by year, while results have diminished. VF launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023 under the banner of \"ecosystem revitalization.\" VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, who made efforts in brand operations and international events. But the key question is—what did all this lavish spending actually achieve? According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) alone reached: $1,709,800 in Q4 2022 for market promotion; another $1,072,887 in Q1 2023. In just six months, nearly $2.8 million was poured into brand promotion and PR activities. Yet, the only visible results for the community were: number of conference attendances, photos and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2,000 days of zero downtime; EVM performance stress tests; These figures are not meaningless, but they resemble PR slides more than a true reflection of the ecosystem. Developer growth? None. Daily on-chain activity? Not disclosed. TVL? Almost nonexistent. Why does increased spending lead to lower community awareness? When all reports only mention \"highlights\" and not \"outcomes,\" transparency naturally slides into a black box. Charge 2: Immediate Payouts, Ongoing Controversy Over Greymass's $5 Million Budget In June 2024, VF allocated 15 million $A (EOS) to establish a \"middleware special fund,\" with the first 5 million $A (EOS) granted to the Greymass team, and the remaining 10 million still in the eosio.mware account. On-chain data shows: funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to Greymass's newly created account uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to accounts with notes like \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling \"salary payments\"; then, transfers were made from these accounts to others, eventually distributed to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, etc., with transfer records noting \"Reward Payout+USD amount\"; most recipient accounts quickly transferred funds to krakenkraken or exchanges like Coinbase for cash out after receiving payments. rewards.gm on-chain transfer records ( Data Source) Additional note: The \"middleware\" built by Greymass refers to infrastructure tools that simplify account creation and interaction processes. Although the Greymass team released several development updates at the start of the grant, there have been almost no technical results or interim summaries published in the past year. In particular, Greymass's middleware tools still face significant technical issues in compatibility and stability and have yet to be widely adopted by mainstream developers. The community's main concerns are: Is there double salary payment or anonymous accounts receiving wages among the 5 million $A (EOS)? Was the fund allocation closely timed with Aaron's appointment, suggesting \"self-approved budgeting\"? Does the salary structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny Greymass's past contributions to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. But has the new policy led them astray? Did the lack of supervision cause them to deviate from their original development intent? These questions remain unanswered. What is certain is that the silence and low output of the \"Greymass $5 Million Project\" make it difficult to address the external trust crisis and further intensify community doubts about the foundation's rational use of funds. Charge 3: Token Price Plunge, Foundation \"Silent,\" Responsibility Becomes a Blind Spot If technical results can be debated and marketing effectiveness quantified, then token price is the most honest indicator. This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted, hitting a low of $0.21—a red alert for any ecosystem. Yet, when the community repeatedly questioned the foundation, the response was always: \"Token price is not within the foundation's responsibilities.\" This statement is irrefutable in itself. Technical organizations are not obligated to manipulate the market. But the contradiction is—when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence is collapsing, the foundation has not discussed any \"expectation stabilization\" or \"support mechanisms.\" What followed was even more unsettling: the foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap or handover plan. The community's concern is not whether the foundation should be responsible for the token price, but: at a critical moment of trust crisis, why choose to withdraw—was it due to inability, indifference, or issues too difficult to face? Responsibility vanished amid the crash. Charge 4: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Quietly Disappears When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point. 2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), real-time progress reports to the community; 2022: Monthly Yield Report, with a few months of slack but still acceptable; 2023: Quarterly report (ENF Quarterly report) 2024: Silence... ... 2025: Silence... ... From the published report data, VF's highest expenditure was in Q4 2022, reaching $7,885,340; subsequent quarterly expenditures gradually declined. However, these reports usually only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categorization and breakdowns, making it difficult for outsiders to track fund flows. The community has long been concerned about the huge expenditures and lack of transparency. The reports repeatedly mention Grant Framework and Pomelo plans, but these were \"suspended\" in 2023; meanwhile, the whitepaper's promise of dedicated fund management for specific projects was neither executed in detail nor publicly settled, and the destination of funds transferred to exchanges remains a mystery. This breakdown in transparency, combined with years of lavish spending, ultimately drove community confidence to rock bottom. From frequent disclosures to gradual sparsity, and now complete silence, the disappearance of transparency almost perfectly mirrors the ecosystem's decline. Even more noteworthy: since Q1 2024, no financial reports have been released. No financial audits, no budget distribution, no project lists, no outstanding grants. The community has been forced to accept a fact: the foundation's operations have shifted from \"high-frequency transparency\" to \"complete black box.\" Meanwhile, most of the high-profile partnership projects VF once promoted stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking real implementation. The once-promised \"transparent operations\" ultimately became a silent cliff. Charge 5: Arbitrary Grants, Grants Become a \"Black Hole,\" No One Knows Where the Money Went Looking back at the foundation's early days, VF did attempt to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various funding programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and public funding pools in partnership with Pomelo. At that stage, funds were distributed quickly and at scale, aiming to \"stop the bleeding fast.\" We cannot deny that this did boost morale in the early days. Here’s a supplementary explanation of Grants: VF grants are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based grants) for individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (project rewards); and public funding channels like Pomelo for ecosystem projects. Grants can be used for both profit-driven and public goods/charity projects. For example—in the first report for Q4 2021, VF made one-time allocations of: $3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project); $1.3 million to fund five technical working groups to write blue papers; $1.265 million to support the community autonomous organization EdenOnEOS; $500,000 as the first Pomelo funding pool; However, the problem is—this was the only quarter in the next four years where VF fully disclosed grant recipients. From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants remained the largest quarterly expenditure (sometimes accounting for 40%~60% of total spending), the reports: no longer disclosed specific grant recipients; did not reveal the actual amounts received by each project; did not disclose project acceptance status; did not mention fund usage details; did not state whether projects delivered results according to milestones; In other words, the numbers remained, but the information disappeared. Only the first quarterly report disclosed the flow of funds for each project. In the following eight reports, Grants remained the \"largest chunk\" of spending, but no longer specified which projects or outcomes benefited. The amount spent is visible, but where the money went is forever unknown. Did the grants truly drive the ecosystem? Were the funds used effectively? Were the projects delivered? Why did the foundation never disclose more information? It raises the suspicion: did the foundation use the banner of \"ecosystem funding\" from the start to distribute large sums? Outwardly, it was to win over the community; internally, it hoarded inflationary funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight. VF's matching pool funds exceeded $10 million, but most projects provided extremely sparse updates, and some disappeared after receiving funds. The End of Another Era The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach, but over the past four years, it has gradually become closed and corrupt. From Yves's graceful resignation without handing over power, to the unaccountable $5 million $A (EOS) middleware grant, from millions in quarterly marketing expenses with no results, to ecosystem grants that vanished without a trace—this is not a failure of \"decentralized governance,\" but a victory for \"centralized plunder.\" This long article is a list of charges, but also a warning document. The collapse of Vaulta is not only a tragedy for EOS, but also a microcosm of the trampling of Web3 ideals.","createTime":"1764149815168","detailId":"3797347","id":"3797347","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1764149815168","originUrl":"https://m.theblockbeats.info/news/60338","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/776ec78a3c10068aa2f9c5d323b0ad061764149449014.jpeg","readCount":849,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,USD","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1764149815168","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/f513682fae92ad3dd8476db8615aec15.png","sourceName":"BlockBeats","title":"Another EOS scandal: community accuses the Foundation of running away with the funds","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"Big Spender, Where Did All the Foundation's Money Go?","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n Original Article Title: \"Vaulta Foundation's Downfall: Price Crash, Missing Audit, and Community Trust Collapse\" \n
\n
\n Original Article Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member \n
\n
\n Original Article Editor: Motion Xiaogong, Motion BlockBeats \n
\n
\n
\n Editor's Note: \n
\n \n
\n Many are familiar with the high-profile $4.2 billion funding 7 years ago, for what was considered the early \"Ethereum Killer\" EOS. However, what many do not know is that after BM was ousted from EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish. \n
\n
\n
\n The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, led by CEO Yves La Rose, affectionately known as \"The Big Beard\" by the community due to his thick beard. Subsequently, under The Big Beard's leadership, EOS was rebranded as Vaulta, pivoting towards the Web3 banking business, and the EOS Network Foundation was also renamed as the Vaulta Foundation. However, The Big Beard's sudden resignation has recently sparked community dissatisfaction, leading to accusations of various past actions. \n
\n
\n
The Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation) is currently experiencing an unprecedented collapse of trust: burning tens of millions of dollars over four years while the coin price hits new lows; projects failing one after another, with the ledger going from public to discontinued; key management figures resigning \"gracefully,\" yet delaying the handover of authority... This article will uncover the mysteries of Vaulta and tell the tale of a project's demise.
\n
\n
Yves Resignation: Graceful Exit or Behind-the-Scenes Power Play?
\n
\n
On November 12, 2025, Yves La Rose, former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation, hereinafter referred to as VF), suddenly posted a resignation statement on Platform X, stating that he had informed the network's 21 block producers on October 29 of his voluntary resignation and the election of new representatives through on-chain governance. The statement was dignified in tone, filled with expressions of \"gratitude\" and \"vision.\" However, to the community's surprise four weeks later, it was discovered that the Vaulta core multisig account was still under Yves' control, with no handover in sight.
\n
\n
\n
\n Yves's Personal Resignation Statement \n
\n
Furthermore, after resigning, Yves worked behind the scenes to push Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. As a result, Aaron was thrust into the spotlight with a massive proposal of 10 million $A (EOS) to continue funding the core development budget. This move sparked widespread community questioning: was this simply a \"head swap\" to prolong the project, effectively transferring remaining public funds.
\n
\n
Charge One: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenditure Shrouded in Mystery
\n
\n
Since VF was established in 2021, ecosystem development has not accelerated with time.
\n
\n
On the contrary, what the community has seen is another unsettling trend: the budget has expanded year by year, while the results have diminished year by year.
\n
\n
Under the guise of \"ecosystem revitalization,\" VF launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023. VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, and they also made efforts in brand operations and international events.
\n
\n
But the key question is—what has all this lavish spending brought?
\n
\n
According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, the sole marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) reached: in 2022 Q4, a staggering $1,709,800 for marketing expenditures; in 2023 Q1, another $1,072,887 spent.
\n
\n
\n
\n
In just 6 months, nearly $2.8 million was poured into brand promotion and public relations activities. However, the community only saw: attendance numbers at events, photos, and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2000 days without downtime; EVM performance tests;
\n
\n
These data are not meaningless, but they resemble more of a PR slideshow rather than the actual state of the ecosystem. Developer growth? Lacking. Daily on-chain activities? Undisclosed. TVL? Almost non-existent. Why does the more spent, the lower the community's perception? When all reports only talk about \"highlights\" and not about \"results,\" transparency naturally slides into opacity.
\n
\n
Charge Two: Instant Money Flow Upon Taking Office, Greymass's $5 Million Budget Controversy Continues
\n
\n
In June 2024, VF allocated $15 million (EOS) to establish the \"Middleware Special Fund,\" with the first batch of $5 million (EOS) being allocated to the Greymass team, and the remaining $10 million currently held in the eosio.mware account.
\n
\n
On-chain data shows: The funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to an account newly created by Greymass called uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to the http://funds.gm account, with a memo of \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling a \"salary payment\"; then, http://funds.gm transferred to http://rewards.gm, finally distributing to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, http://apporc.gm, with transfer records annotated with \"Reward Payout + USD amount\"; most of the salaried accounts swiftly cashed out by transferring to exchanges like krakenkraken or Coinbase post-receipt.
\n
\n
\n
\n rewards.gm On-chain Transfer Records ( \n Data Source) \n
\n
\n
Additional Information: The \"Middleware\" built by Greymass refers to the foundational infrastructure tools that simplify the account creation and interaction processes.
\n
\n
Despite the Greymass team issuing several development updates early in the allocation period, there have been almost no technical accomplishments or periodic summaries released in the past year. Particularly, Greymass's middleware tools still face many technical issues in compatibility and stability and have not been widely adopted by mainstream developers.
\n
\n
The community's focal point of criticism is: Does the $5 million (EOS) allocation involve duplicate salaries, unidentified accounts receiving salaries, or other opaque behaviors? Does the fund disbursement closely coincide with Aaron's assumption of office, raising suspicions of a \"self-approval budget\"? Does the salary payment structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny the contributions Greymass has made to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. However, have they been misled in the new policy? Have they deviated from the original development intent in the absence of supervision?
\n
\n
These issues have yet to be resolved.
\n
\n
It can be confirmed that the silence and low productivity of the \"Greymass Five Million Project\" have made it difficult to respond to an external trust crisis, further exacerbating the community's questioning of the Foundation's fund usage legitimacy.
\n
\n
Charge Three: Coin Price Plummet, Foundation \"Silent,\" Accountability Became a Blind Spot
\n
\n
If technical achievements can be disputed and marketing effects quantified, then the token price is the most honest indicator.
\n
\n
This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted all the way, hitting a low of $0.21—a signal dangerous enough to put any ecosystem in a red alert. However, as the community continues to inquire, the Foundation's response has always been: \"The coin price is not within the Foundation's scope of responsibility.\"
\n
\n
This statement itself is irrefutable.
\n
\n
A technical organization is not obliged to manipulate the market. But the contradiction lies in the fact that when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence is collapsing, the Foundation has not had any discussion of \"stability expectations\" or \"market support mechanisms.\"
\n
\n
What followed were even more unsettling actions: the Foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap or transition plan.
\n
\n
The community's question is not whether the Foundation should be responsible for the coin price, but: at a critical moment when the ecosystem is facing a trust crisis, why choose to withdraw: is it due to incapacity, indifference, or some issues that are inconvenient to face? Accountability has disappeared in this crash.
\n
\n
Charge Four: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Disappeared Quietly
\n
\n
When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point.
\n
\n
2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), providing real-time progress reports to the community;
\n
2022: Monthly report (Monthly Yield Report), slacking off for a few months, but still acceptable;
\n
2023: Quarterly report (ENF Quarterly Report)
\n
2024: Silence... ...
\n
2025: Silence... ...
\n
\n
\n
From the reported data, VF's expenditure was the highest in the fourth quarter of 2022, reaching $7,885,340; subsequent quarterly expenses gradually declined.
\n
\n
However, these reports often only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categorization and specifics, making it difficult for outsiders to judge the fund's destination. The community has long had doubts about massive spending and lack of transparency.
\n
\n
The report repeatedly mentions programs such as the Grant Framework and Pomelo, which experienced a phased \"shutdown\" in 2023; at the same time, the whitepaper's commitment to project-specific fund management has not been meticulously executed or publicly settled, and the destination of funds allocated to exchanges remains a mystery.
\n
\n
This breakdown in transparency, coupled with years of extravagance, eventually led to a rock-bottom community confidence.
\n
\n
From intense disclosure to gradual scarcity, and now to complete silence, the disappearance of transparency is almost perfectly synchronized with the ecological heat curve.
\n
\n
More notably: since Q1 of 2024, no financial reports have been published. There are no financial audits, no budget distributions, no project lists, and no outstanding allocations.
\n
\n
The community has been forced to accept one fact: the Foundation's operations have shifted from \"high-frequency transparency\" to a \"complete black box.\"
\n
\n
Simultaneously, many of VF's high-profile projects that were once touted for collaboration have mostly stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking practical implementation. The promised \"operational transparency\" has ultimately become a silent cliff.
\n
\n
Charge Five: Arbitrary Allocation, Grants Have Become a \"Black Hole,\" and No One Knows Where the Money Went
\n
\n
Looking back at the Foundation's early days, VF did indeed attempt to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various grant programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and the public grant pool used in conjunction with Pomelo.
\n
\n
At that stage, the speed of fund disbursement was fast, and the scale was large, with the intention of \"stopping the bleeding quickly.\"
\n
\n
We cannot deny that they did play a role in boosting morale in the early stages.
\n
\n
\n
\n
Here is an additional note on Grants: VF's allocations are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based allocations), targeting individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (awards given to projects) and distributions to ecosystem projects through public grant channels like Pomelo. Funding can be used for both for-profit and public goods/charity projects.
\n
\n
For example—In the first report of Q4 2021, VF allocated in a single instance:
\n
$3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project);
\n
$1.3M funding for five technical workgroups to write a whitepaper;
\n
$1.265M support for the community governance organization EdenOnEOS;
\n
$500K funding pool for the Pomelo inaugural season;
\n
\n
However, the issue lies in the fact that this is the only quarterly report in VF's entire four-year allocation that fully disclosed the recipients of the funding.
\n
\n
From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants have consistently been the largest portion of quarterly expenditures (at times accounting for 40% to 60% of total spending), the reports no longer: disclose specific funding recipients; reveal the actual amount received by each project; disclose project acceptance status; mention detailed fund usage; explain if projects have achieved milestones;
\n
\n
In other words, while the numbers are still there, the information has disappeared.
\n
\n
Only the first quarterly report disclosed the flow of funds to each project. In the subsequent eight reports, Grants' funding expenditure continues to be the \"biggest item,\" but no longer do they itemize the beneficiary projects or outcomes.
\n
\n
We can see how much money is spent, but no one ever knows where the money is going.
\n
\n
Has the funding truly driven the ecosystem? Has the money been used effectively? Have projects delivered? Why doesn't the foundation disclose more information?
\n
\n
It inevitably raises questions: Did the foundation start by lavishly spending money under the guise of \"ecosystem funding\"? Outwardly, it is to win over the community and buy people's hearts, but internally it holds inflation funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight.
\n
\n
The total amount in the VF matching pool exceeds tens of millions of dollars, but most projects have extremely rare updates, some even disappearing after receiving funds.
\n
\n
End of an Era
\n
\n
The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach but gradually moved towards closedness and corruption over the past four years.
\n
\n
From Yves' dignified resignation without handing over power, to the $5M (in EOS) middleware funding without accountability, from hundreds of thousands of dollars in quarterly marketing expenses with no effect, to the silence after ecosystem funding—this is not a failure of \"decentralized governance\" but a victory of \"centralized plunder.\"
\n
\n
This long article is a list of charges and a warning document.
\n
\n
The collapse of Vaulta is not just the tragedy of EOS but also a microcosm of the trampling of the Web3 ideal.
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605083313","contentText":"Original Article Title: \"Vaulta Foundation's Downfall: Price Crash, Missing Audit, and Community Trust Collapse\" Original Article Author: MMK (@mmk_btc), Vaulta Community Member Original Article Editor: Motion Xiaogong, Motion BlockBeats Editor's Note: Many are familiar with the high-profile $4.2 billion funding 7 years ago, for what was considered the early \"Ethereum Killer\" EOS. However, what many do not know is that after BM was ousted from EOS, the parent company Block.one took the previously raised funds and shifted focus to building the IPO trading platform Bullish. The remaining EOS was taken over by the EOS Network Foundation, led by CEO Yves La Rose, affectionately known as \"The Big Beard\" by the community due to his thick beard. Subsequently, under The Big Beard's leadership, EOS was rebranded as Vaulta, pivoting towards the Web3 banking business, and the EOS Network Foundation was also renamed as the Vaulta Foundation. However, The Big Beard's sudden resignation has recently sparked community dissatisfaction, leading to accusations of various past actions. The Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation) is currently experiencing an unprecedented collapse of trust: burning tens of millions of dollars over four years while the coin price hits new lows; projects failing one after another, with the ledger going from public to discontinued; key management figures resigning \"gracefully,\" yet delaying the handover of authority... This article will uncover the mysteries of Vaulta and tell the tale of a project's demise. Yves Resignation: Graceful Exit or Behind-the-Scenes Power Play? On November 12, 2025, Yves La Rose, former CEO of the Vaulta Foundation (formerly EOS Network Foundation, hereinafter referred to as VF), suddenly posted a resignation statement on Platform X, stating that he had informed the network's 21 block producers on October 29 of his voluntary resignation and the election of new representatives through on-chain governance. The statement was dignified in tone, filled with expressions of \"gratitude\" and \"vision.\" However, to the community's surprise four weeks later, it was discovered that the Vaulta core multisig account was still under Yves' control, with no handover in sight. Yves's Personal Resignation Statement Furthermore, after resigning, Yves worked behind the scenes to push Greymass founder Aaron Cox to take over his position. As a result, Aaron was thrust into the spotlight with a massive proposal of 10 million $A (EOS) to continue funding the core development budget. This move sparked widespread community questioning: was this simply a \"head swap\" to prolong the project, effectively transferring remaining public funds. Charge One: Lavish Spending, Marketing Expenditure Shrouded in Mystery Since VF was established in 2021, ecosystem development has not accelerated with time. On the contrary, what the community has seen is another unsettling trend: the budget has expanded year by year, while the results have diminished year by year. Under the guise of \"ecosystem revitalization,\" VF launched a market expansion plan in 2022–2023. VF did recruit an excellent marketing team, and they also made efforts in brand operations and international events. But the key question is—what has all this lavish spending brought? According to nine disclosed quarterly reports, the sole marketing-related expenses (PR & Marketing) reached: in 2022 Q4, a staggering $1,709,800 for marketing expenditures; in 2023 Q1, another $1,072,887 spent. In just 6 months, nearly $2.8 million was poured into brand promotion and public relations activities. However, the community only saw: attendance numbers at events, photos, and reports; Twitter follower growth; 2000 days without downtime; EVM performance tests; These data are not meaningless, but they resemble more of a PR slideshow rather than the actual state of the ecosystem. Developer growth? Lacking. Daily on-chain activities? Undisclosed. TVL? Almost non-existent. Why does the more spent, the lower the community's perception? When all reports only talk about \"highlights\" and not about \"results,\" transparency naturally slides into opacity. Charge Two: Instant Money Flow Upon Taking Office, Greymass's $5 Million Budget Controversy Continues In June 2024, VF allocated $15 million (EOS) to establish the \"Middleware Special Fund,\" with the first batch of $5 million (EOS) being allocated to the Greymass team, and the remaining $10 million currently held in the eosio.mware account. On-chain data shows: The funds were transferred from the foundation's eosio.mware account to an account newly created by Greymass called uxuiuxuiuxui; subsequently, this wallet made monthly transfers to the http://funds.gm account, with a memo of \"Operation + USD/CAD price,\" resembling a \"salary payment\"; then, http://funds.gm transferred to http://rewards.gm, finally distributing to several accounts such as jesta, inconsistent, http://apporc.gm, with transfer records annotated with \"Reward Payout + USD amount\"; most of the salaried accounts swiftly cashed out by transferring to exchanges like krakenkraken or Coinbase post-receipt. rewards.gm On-chain Transfer Records ( Data Source) Additional Information: The \"Middleware\" built by Greymass refers to the foundational infrastructure tools that simplify the account creation and interaction processes. Despite the Greymass team issuing several development updates early in the allocation period, there have been almost no technical accomplishments or periodic summaries released in the past year. Particularly, Greymass's middleware tools still face many technical issues in compatibility and stability and have not been widely adopted by mainstream developers. The community's focal point of criticism is: Does the $5 million (EOS) allocation involve duplicate salaries, unidentified accounts receiving salaries, or other opaque behaviors? Does the fund disbursement closely coincide with Aaron's assumption of office, raising suspicions of a \"self-approval budget\"? Does the salary payment structure lack third-party oversight? We do not deny the contributions Greymass has made to the ecosystem or Aaron's early technical reputation. However, have they been misled in the new policy? Have they deviated from the original development intent in the absence of supervision? These issues have yet to be resolved. It can be confirmed that the silence and low productivity of the \"Greymass Five Million Project\" have made it difficult to respond to an external trust crisis, further exacerbating the community's questioning of the Foundation's fund usage legitimacy. Charge Three: Coin Price Plummet, Foundation \"Silent,\" Accountability Became a Blind Spot If technical achievements can be disputed and marketing effects quantified, then the token price is the most honest indicator. This year, $A (EOS) has plummeted all the way, hitting a low of $0.21—a signal dangerous enough to put any ecosystem in a red alert. However, as the community continues to inquire, the Foundation's response has always been: \"The coin price is not within the Foundation's scope of responsibility.\" This statement itself is irrefutable. A technical organization is not obliged to manipulate the market. But the contradiction lies in the fact that when all ecosystem indicators are declining and community confidence is collapsing, the Foundation has not had any discussion of \"stability expectations\" or \"market support mechanisms.\" What followed were even more unsettling actions: the Foundation announced its \"dissolution,\" with no roadmap or transition plan. The community's question is not whether the Foundation should be responsible for the coin price, but: at a critical moment when the ecosystem is facing a trust crisis, why choose to withdraw: is it due to incapacity, indifference, or some issues that are inconvenient to face? Accountability has disappeared in this crash. Charge Four: From Weekly Updates to Silence, Transparency Disappeared Quietly When VF was first established, transparency was once its biggest selling point. 2021: Weekly updates (Everything EOS Weekly Report), providing real-time progress reports to the community; 2022: Monthly report (Monthly Yield Report), slacking off for a few months, but still acceptable; 2023: Quarterly report (ENF Quarterly Report) 2024: Silence... ... 2025: Silence... ... From the reported data, VF's expenditure was the highest in the fourth quarter of 2022, reaching $7,885,340; subsequent quarterly expenses gradually declined. However, these reports often only disclose the total amount, lacking detailed categorization and specifics, making it difficult for outsiders to judge the fund's destination. The community has long had doubts about massive spending and lack of transparency. The report repeatedly mentions programs such as the Grant Framework and Pomelo, which experienced a phased \"shutdown\" in 2023; at the same time, the whitepaper's commitment to project-specific fund management has not been meticulously executed or publicly settled, and the destination of funds allocated to exchanges remains a mystery. This breakdown in transparency, coupled with years of extravagance, eventually led to a rock-bottom community confidence. From intense disclosure to gradual scarcity, and now to complete silence, the disappearance of transparency is almost perfectly synchronized with the ecological heat curve. More notably: since Q1 of 2024, no financial reports have been published. There are no financial audits, no budget distributions, no project lists, and no outstanding allocations. The community has been forced to accept one fact: the Foundation's operations have shifted from \"high-frequency transparency\" to a \"complete black box.\" Simultaneously, many of VF's high-profile projects that were once touted for collaboration have mostly stalled at the \"communication stage,\" lacking practical implementation. The promised \"operational transparency\" has ultimately become a silent cliff. Charge Five: Arbitrary Allocation, Grants Have Become a \"Black Hole,\" and No One Knows Where the Money Went Looking back at the Foundation's early days, VF did indeed attempt to rebuild the Vaulta (EOS) ecosystem through various grant programs, including the Grant Framework, Recognition Grants, and the public grant pool used in conjunction with Pomelo. At that stage, the speed of fund disbursement was fast, and the scale was large, with the intention of \"stopping the bleeding quickly.\" We cannot deny that they did play a role in boosting morale in the early stages. Here is an additional note on Grants: VF's allocations are divided into the publicly recruited \"Grant Framework\" (milestone-based allocations), targeting individuals, teams, or companies, mostly for technical projects; Recognition Grants (awards given to projects) and distributions to ecosystem projects through public grant channels like Pomelo. Funding can be used for both for-profit and public goods/charity projects. For example—In the first report of Q4 2021, VF allocated in a single instance: $3.5 million in Recognition Grants (an average of $100,000 per project); $1.3M funding for five technical workgroups to write a whitepaper; $1.265M support for the community governance organization EdenOnEOS; $500K funding pool for the Pomelo inaugural season; However, the issue lies in the fact that this is the only quarterly report in VF's entire four-year allocation that fully disclosed the recipients of the funding. From Q4 2021 to Q4 2023, although Grants have consistently been the largest portion of quarterly expenditures (at times accounting for 40% to 60% of total spending), the reports no longer: disclose specific funding recipients; reveal the actual amount received by each project; disclose project acceptance status; mention detailed fund usage; explain if projects have achieved milestones; In other words, while the numbers are still there, the information has disappeared. Only the first quarterly report disclosed the flow of funds to each project. In the subsequent eight reports, Grants' funding expenditure continues to be the \"biggest item,\" but no longer do they itemize the beneficiary projects or outcomes. We can see how much money is spent, but no one ever knows where the money is going. Has the funding truly driven the ecosystem? Has the money been used effectively? Have projects delivered? Why doesn't the foundation disclose more information? It inevitably raises questions: Did the foundation start by lavishly spending money under the guise of \"ecosystem funding\"? Outwardly, it is to win over the community and buy people's hearts, but internally it holds inflation funds and reserves, lacking results and oversight. The total amount in the VF matching pool exceeds tens of millions of dollars, but most projects have extremely rare updates, some even disappearing after receiving funds. End of an Era The Vaulta Foundation once promised governance reform with a \"transparent, community-driven\" approach but gradually moved towards closedness and corruption over the past four years. From Yves' dignified resignation without handing over power, to the $5M (in EOS) middleware funding without accountability, from hundreds of thousands of dollars in quarterly marketing expenses with no effect, to the silence after ecosystem funding—this is not a failure of \"decentralized governance\" but a victory of \"centralized plunder.\" This long article is a list of charges and a warning document. The collapse of Vaulta is not just the tragedy of EOS but also a microcosm of the trampling of the Web3 ideal.","createTime":"1764150060336","detailId":"3797377","id":"3797377","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1764132912000","originUrl":"https://m.theblockbeats.info/en/news/60338","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/776ec78a3c10068aa2f9c5d323b0ad061764149449014.jpeg","readCount":604,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,USD","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1764132912000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/f513682fae92ad3dd8476db8615aec15.png","sourceName":"BlockBeats","title":"EOS Crisis Redux: Community Lambasts Foundation for Exit Scam","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
The crypto coin market is showing signs of a powerful resurgence, driven by a new wave of ambitious projects blending innovation, technology, and community momentum. Among them, one name in particular, BlockDAG, is fast emerging as the centerpiece of investor attention, standing alongside rising contenders like Ozak AI and Maxi Doge, which are redefining what early-stage crypto investments can look like.
\n
\n
\n
Points Cover In This Article:
\n Toggle \n
\n
\n
Ozak AI Raises $4M in Phase Six
\n
Maxi Doge Demand Rises as Traders Bet on Utility
\n
BlockDAG’s $435M Fundraising Drive
\n
Final Thoughts
\n
\n
\n
Each represents a distinct slice of the evolving digital economy: Ozak AI is merging predictive analytics with decentralized infrastructure; Maxi Doge is infusing meme culture with real trading utility; and BlockDAG is setting records by raising $435 million, echoing legendary industry moments that minted early millionaires.
\n
\n
\n
While Ozak AI appeals to those betting on the rise of AI-integrated finance and Maxi Doge taps into trader-fueled meme mania, BlockDAG’s blend of scalability, decentralization, and its Awakening Testnet stands out as the most future-ready contender.
\n
As market conditions tighten, traders are asking one question: which of these three projects could truly define the next crypto wealth cycle?
\n
Ozak AI Raises $4M in Phase Six
\n
Ozak AI has raised over $4 million in Phase Six, with its token now priced at $0.012 and set to rise to $0.014 in the next stage. Despite a wider market slowdown, the project continues to attract traders through its blend of predictive AI and decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN).
\n
Its main platform, EON, offers real-time market forecasts, sentiment analysis, and price modeling, helping traders make data-driven decisions. The DePIN setup ensures transparent and secure data access across distributed nodes.
\n
\n
\n
With more than 973 million tokens already sold and a roadmap that includes data vaults, AI agents, and a full business platform launch, Ozak AI is gaining steady attention. For traders seeking long-term potential in AI-powered blockchain analytics, this project’s growing traction makes it worth watching.
\n
Maxi Doge Demand Rises as Traders Bet on Utility
\n
Maxi Doge has raised over $3.8 million, drawing strong interest from traders looking for the next breakout meme coin. Unlike traditional meme tokens, Maxi Doge blends humor with real futures trading features, positioning itself as a utility-driven project in a playful wrapper.
\n
Built on Ethereum , the token plans to integrate with perpetual futures platforms and host weekly trading competitions with crypto rewards, adding more engagement than most meme coins offer. Its staking program, currently offering up to 80% APY, has also attracted early participants.
\n
\n
\n
As the token price of $0.000265 is set to rise soon, traders eyeing high-risk, high-reward opportunities are watching Maxi Doge closely. With a growing community and a clear roadmap, the project could appeal to those seeking exposure beyond the usual meme coin hype.
\n
BlockDAG’s $435M Fundraising Drive
\n
History has a way of repeating itself, or at least rhyming, and the crypto market is starting to sound familiar again. Back in 2017–2018, massive fundraising campaigns like EOS stunned the industry, raising over $4 billion and turning early participants into overnight millionaires.
\n
Fast-forward to today, and we’re seeing a similar story unfold with BlockDAG (BDAG), which has already raised over $435 million to date. The numbers, momentum, and timing all point to a project following a very familiar and profitable pattern.
\n
Currently priced at $0.005 in Batch 32, BlockDAG is nearing the final stages of its campaign, with only a few billion coins remaining before the cutoff date on February 10, 2026. Analysts and traders are calling this one of the biggest opportunities since the early days of Ethereum and EOS.
\n
The reason? It’s not just hype, BlockDAG’s underlying technology promises high scalability, fast transaction speeds, and a revolutionary Awakening Testnet, designed to power the next generation of decentralized applications.
\n
\n
\n
Those who understand market cycles know that major fundraisers tend to mark the beginning of historic runs. With a rapidly growing community and institutional backing worth $86 million, BlockDAG could easily be the project that defines this decade. If history rhymes once more, those who act now might be writing the next great crypto success story.
\n
Final Thoughts
\n
When it comes to long-term potential, each crypto coin campaign tells a different story. Ozak AI represents disciplined innovation, a project targeting data transparency and predictive modeling in DePIN infrastructure. Maxi Doge, with its fusion of humor and trading mechanics, captures the speculative spirit that often ignites viral momentum.
\n
Yet, BlockDAG stands in a league of its own. With $435 million raised, a price of $0.005, and only weeks left before the February 10 deadline, it feels reminiscent of crypto’s early golden era, when conviction outweighed caution and early adopters became legends.
\n
Its Awakening Testnet, $86 million institutional backing, and vast global community make it more than just another fundraising event; it’s a movement. For those seeking the next major breakthrough, BlockDAG may be the blueprint of the next great crypto success story.
\n
\n
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605052339","contentText":"The crypto coin market is showing signs of a powerful resurgence, driven by a new wave of ambitious projects blending innovation, technology, and community momentum. Among them, one name in particular, BlockDAG, is fast emerging as the centerpiece of investor attention, standing alongside rising contenders like Ozak AI and Maxi Doge, which are redefining what early-stage crypto investments can look like. Points Cover In This Article: Toggle Ozak AI Raises $4M in Phase Six Maxi Doge Demand Rises as Traders Bet on Utility BlockDAG’s $435M Fundraising Drive Final Thoughts Each represents a distinct slice of the evolving digital economy: Ozak AI is merging predictive analytics with decentralized infrastructure; Maxi Doge is infusing meme culture with real trading utility; and BlockDAG is setting records by raising $435 million, echoing legendary industry moments that minted early millionaires. While Ozak AI appeals to those betting on the rise of AI-integrated finance and Maxi Doge taps into trader-fueled meme mania, BlockDAG’s blend of scalability, decentralization, and its Awakening Testnet stands out as the most future-ready contender. As market conditions tighten, traders are asking one question: which of these three projects could truly define the next crypto wealth cycle? Ozak AI Raises $4M in Phase Six Ozak AI has raised over $4 million in Phase Six, with its token now priced at $0.012 and set to rise to $0.014 in the next stage. Despite a wider market slowdown, the project continues to attract traders through its blend of predictive AI and decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN). Its main platform, EON, offers real-time market forecasts, sentiment analysis, and price modeling, helping traders make data-driven decisions. The DePIN setup ensures transparent and secure data access across distributed nodes. With more than 973 million tokens already sold and a roadmap that includes data vaults, AI agents, and a full business platform launch, Ozak AI is gaining steady attention. For traders seeking long-term potential in AI-powered blockchain analytics, this project’s growing traction makes it worth watching. Maxi Doge Demand Rises as Traders Bet on Utility Maxi Doge has raised over $3.8 million, drawing strong interest from traders looking for the next breakout meme coin. Unlike traditional meme tokens, Maxi Doge blends humor with real futures trading features, positioning itself as a utility-driven project in a playful wrapper. Built on Ethereum , the token plans to integrate with perpetual futures platforms and host weekly trading competitions with crypto rewards, adding more engagement than most meme coins offer. Its staking program, currently offering up to 80% APY, has also attracted early participants. As the token price of $0.000265 is set to rise soon, traders eyeing high-risk, high-reward opportunities are watching Maxi Doge closely. With a growing community and a clear roadmap, the project could appeal to those seeking exposure beyond the usual meme coin hype. BlockDAG’s $435M Fundraising Drive History has a way of repeating itself, or at least rhyming, and the crypto market is starting to sound familiar again. Back in 2017–2018, massive fundraising campaigns like EOS stunned the industry, raising over $4 billion and turning early participants into overnight millionaires. Fast-forward to today, and we’re seeing a similar story unfold with BlockDAG (BDAG), which has already raised over $435 million to date. The numbers, momentum, and timing all point to a project following a very familiar and profitable pattern. Currently priced at $0.005 in Batch 32, BlockDAG is nearing the final stages of its campaign, with only a few billion coins remaining before the cutoff date on February 10, 2026. Analysts and traders are calling this one of the biggest opportunities since the early days of Ethereum and EOS. The reason? It’s not just hype, BlockDAG’s underlying technology promises high scalability, fast transaction speeds, and a revolutionary Awakening Testnet, designed to power the next generation of decentralized applications. Those who understand market cycles know that major fundraisers tend to mark the beginning of historic runs. With a rapidly growing community and institutional backing worth $86 million, BlockDAG could easily be the project that defines this decade. If history rhymes once more, those who act now might be writing the next great crypto success story. Final Thoughts When it comes to long-term potential, each crypto coin campaign tells a different story. Ozak AI represents disciplined innovation, a project targeting data transparency and predictive modeling in DePIN infrastructure. Maxi Doge, with its fusion of humor and trading mechanics, captures the speculative spirit that often ignites viral momentum. Yet, BlockDAG stands in a league of its own. With $435 million raised, a price of $0.005, and only weeks left before the February 10 deadline, it feels reminiscent of crypto’s early golden era, when conviction outweighed caution and early adopters became legends. Its Awakening Testnet, $86 million institutional backing, and vast global community make it more than just another fundraising event; it’s a movement. For those seeking the next major breakthrough, BlockDAG may be the blueprint of the next great crypto success story.","createTime":"1762532160816","detailId":"3664161","id":"3664161","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1762532102000","originUrl":"https://coinlineup.com/ozak-ai-climbs-in-phase-six-maxi-doge-nears-4m-but-blockdag-dominates-with-a-435m-presale-run/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":247,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,4,MKR","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1762532102000","siteImg":"","sourceName":"Coinlineup","title":"Ozak AI Climbs in Phase Six, Maxi Doge Nears $4M, But BlockDAG Dominates with a $435M+ Presale Run!","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n Key Points: \n
\n
Pi Network price fell 90% post-upgrade, centralization cited.
No major exchange listings hinder market liquidity.
\n
\n
\n
The Pi Network price crash, over 90% down from its peak, is fueled by rapid token unlocks, centralization, and a lack of significant exchange listings. Learn from similar events with Filecoin and EOS facing intense volatility.
\n
The event is significant due to the massive price drop despite the upgrade, indicating major underlying market and investor concerns.
\n
The Pi Network’s price crash comes amidst rapid token unlocks and a centralized token supply, raising doubts among investors. Founder Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis emphasized real-world crypto utility but has not addressed the crisis officially.
\n
\n Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis, Founder, Pi Network, “The recent App Studio upgrade aims at enhancing developer tools and ensuring better ecosystem integration.” \n
\n
The lack of exchange listings on platforms like Binance and Coinbase, along with low trading volumes , contribute to the token’s decline. Dr. Chengdiao Fan, who co-founded Pi Network, will speak at TOKEN2049, potentially swaying investor views.
\n
Market reactions show a trend of extreme fear among investors. Other cryptocurrencies remain unaffected. Experts suggest token burns and leading exchange listings could be solutions, although no formal plans are reported by Pi’s leadership.
\n
The crypto community remains unsettled, with discussions focusing on Pi’s centralization and lack of liquidity. Historical trends show similar issues have led to significant downturns in other crypto projects. The absence of regulatory actions or broader L1/L2 impacts limits contagion risk.
\n
As the aftermath unfolds, potential outcomes could include higher market volatility, regulatory scrutiny, or shifts in investor trust. Long-term recovery would need strategic moves such as decentralization and improving liquidity .
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560605023061","contentText":"Key Points: Pi Network price fell 90% post-upgrade, centralization cited. Expert opinions highlight inflationary supply, liquidity issues. No major exchange listings hinder market liquidity. The Pi Network price crash, over 90% down from its peak, is fueled by rapid token unlocks, centralization, and a lack of significant exchange listings. Learn from similar events with Filecoin and EOS facing intense volatility. The event is significant due to the massive price drop despite the upgrade, indicating major underlying market and investor concerns. The Pi Network’s price crash comes amidst rapid token unlocks and a centralized token supply, raising doubts among investors. Founder Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis emphasized real-world crypto utility but has not addressed the crisis officially. Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis, Founder, Pi Network, “The recent App Studio upgrade aims at enhancing developer tools and ensuring better ecosystem integration.” The lack of exchange listings on platforms like Binance and Coinbase, along with low trading volumes , contribute to the token’s decline. Dr. Chengdiao Fan, who co-founded Pi Network, will speak at TOKEN2049, potentially swaying investor views. Market reactions show a trend of extreme fear among investors. Other cryptocurrencies remain unaffected. Experts suggest token burns and leading exchange listings could be solutions, although no formal plans are reported by Pi’s leadership. The crypto community remains unsettled, with discussions focusing on Pi’s centralization and lack of liquidity. Historical trends show similar issues have led to significant downturns in other crypto projects. The absence of regulatory actions or broader L1/L2 impacts limits contagion risk. As the aftermath unfolds, potential outcomes could include higher market volatility, regulatory scrutiny, or shifts in investor trust. Long-term recovery would need strategic moves such as decentralization and improving liquidity .","createTime":"1760983800227","detailId":"3513378","id":"3513378","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1760983742000","originUrl":"https://coinlineup.com/pi-network-price-drop-post-upgrade/","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":622,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,FIL,PI","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407178","sectionName":"","showTime":"1760983742000","siteImg":"","sourceName":"Coinlineup","title":"Pi Network Token Price Declines After Upgrade","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Global Tech Elites Gather, Sparking Ideas to Lead a New Chapter in the Digital Future
From October 13 to 14, 2025, the highly anticipated 2025 VELOZA Global Technology Awards Ceremony Carnival · Singapore concluded successfully at the Marina Bay Sands International Convention and Exhibition Center in Singapore. This grand event was co-hosted by Veloza, Nexus 2140, and ME, with APG and OWAA as the main title sponsors, and Moore Labs, Feixiaohao, ODAILY, BlockBeats, and ChainCatcher as co-organizers. The event brought together thousands of representatives from the technology, finance, and blockchain sectors from more than ten countries worldwide, who jointly explored innovation and the future of the digital economy.
This summit, themed \"Empowering the Real Economy, Driving the Digital Future,\" focused deeply on cutting-edge topics such as Web3 decentralized technology, artificial intelligence (AI), real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, cross-border payment innovation, and blockchain gaming ecosystems. Representatives from academic institutions, foundations, business leaders, and technical experts from the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, China, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia gathered together, creating a lively atmosphere with frequent exchanges of ideas.
Summit Focuses on Cutting-edge Technology, Empowering the Global Digital Economy
With the theme \"Empowering the Real Economy, Driving the Digital Future,\" the conference focused on core topics such as Web3 decentralized technology, artificial intelligence (AI), real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, cross-border payment innovation, and blockchain gaming ecosystems. Representatives from global academic institutions, renowned foundation leaders, business executives, and industry experts shared their insights in multiple high-level forums, engaging in heated discussions on topics such as \"How Technological Innovation Empowers the Real Economy\" and \"The Prospects of AI and RWA Integration,\" providing new ideas and directions for the development of the digital economy.
Strong Lineup of International Guests · Fusion of Ideas and Perspectives
Several foundation representatives from the United States delivered high-level keynote speeches and case studies, including: Allan W. Jennings, Esq (Vice Chairman of Velo Foundation North America / NASA Advisor), who elaborated on the cross-disciplinary integration from space technology to blockchain trust mechanisms; Gerard Mc Keon (Publisher of Black Tie International magazine), who shared the new role of Web3 in global media and brand communication; Juan Ardila (New York State Assemblyman), who interpreted the U.S. policy trends on digital assets and Web3 innovation; Paul Sladkus (CBS reporter, Emmy Award winner) and Edward Cologna (SRTV producer) discussed the integration trends of AI, film & television, and blockchain technology.
Meanwhile, in-depth analyses from Rich Teo, co-founder of Paxos stablecoin, Wall Street investor Jesse Weiner, and international financial analyst Ivy Ma (CFA) brought global perspectives on fintech to the audience.
At this high-energy forum focusing on the new wave of AI+RWA and DeFi innovation, several industry leaders from around the world gathered to share forward-looking insights and thoughts on the core topics of \"asset tokenization, institutional participation, and intelligent finance.\"
Tingtai Luo, founder of ATRNX.AI, took the stage first with the keynote speech \"AI+RWA Reshaping DeFi Trillion-level Liquidity: Launch of RWA Application Chain ATRNX.OS.\" He deeply analyzed how AI integrates with real-world assets to drive a new round of liquidity dividends in decentralized finance.
Following that, Janice Tang (Chief Marketing Officer of Cregis) shared enterprise-level digital asset management solutions with the topic \"Digital Asset Solution for Enterprise\"; Sistine Chen (Chief Business Officer of exSat & Vaulta Labs) discussed the future logic of banking service innovation from a historical perspective with the topic \"From 1875 to 2025: Think Different About Banking Service.\"
Adele Hu (Head of DeFi & RWA at Taiko) presented \"The Most Decentralized Layer 2 Network on Ethereum: Taiko Injects New Momentum into Institutional Asset Tokenization,\" showcasing the breakthrough potential of Layer 2 networks in the RWA ecosystem; Wang Hao, CFA, shared cutting-edge insights into the UAE's digital finance transformation with the topic \"Building Digital Finance Future — Insights from UAE.\"
In addition, Chris (Executive Secretary-General of WBO & Co-founder of Dogecity) delivered an engaging keynote \"Building the DOGEconomy: How Dogcity Makes POW Mining Profitable and Fun,\" interpreting the commercial and community value of the PoW ecosystem from a unique perspective; Qian Yi's speech on global digital financial trends also sparked widespread discussion on site.
Merlin M. Ostermann (Co-founder of Arkreen) discussed the ecological impact of green energy tokenization with \"From Tokenizing Green Energy to the Impact of Stablecoin\"; Abel Tiong (BD Manager of Plume) explained the key gateway for institutional RWA on-chain with \"The Institutional Gateway to Onchain Real-world Assets\"; Ash Datsiuk (Head of Growth at Theoriq) brought \"AI & Crypto: Managed Institutional Capital,\" exploring how AI empowers institutional capital management; finally, Jeff Ko (Chief Analyst at CoinEx) concluded with \"Crypto x TradFi — Blurring the Lines,\" analyzing the integration trend between crypto finance and traditional finance.
Their speeches were pragmatic and forward-looking, resonating widely with the attendees. The atmosphere was enthusiastic, and after the event, many guests took group photos together as a memento.
APG Launches Global Initiative, Leading a New Era of Privacy Finance
As the main title partner of this summit, APG (Advanced Privacy Global) made a major announcement during the event, launching the APG Global Launch Conference.
APG, as the global compliant privacy payment platform upgraded through the strategic acquisition by GCEX Group, is centered on zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARK), integrating cross-border clearing networks and intelligent compliance systems, and is committed to building a new financial infrastructure that is \"privacy-protecting, compliance-first, and globally accessible.\"
At the conference, APG showcased its latest achievements in cross-border payments, digital identity verification, DeFi compliance services, and Web3 financial ecosystem development, and announced strategic cooperation with multiple international foundations and institutions to jointly promote the global standardization of privacy finance and compliance technology. This series of initiatives won high recognition from experts and institutional representatives present and was regarded as an important milestone in the process of Web3 financial compliance.
The two-day summit was filled with lively discussions and fruitful results. Whether it was the in-depth exchange of ideas or the signing of international cooperation intentions, it marked that the Veloza Tech Innovation Expo has become an important bridge connecting Eastern and Western technological innovation and the digital financial ecosystem.
The successful hosting of this grand event not only demonstrated Singapore's international influence as a global technology and financial center but also further cemented the global benchmark status of the Veloza Global Technology Awards Ceremony Carnival in the fields of Web3 and innovative technology.
The 2025 Veloza Global Tech & Innovation Expo & Awards has come to a successful conclusion, but the journey of technological innovation continues. The resonance of global tech leaders' ideas will continue to drive the digital economy toward a more open, intelligent, and sustainable future.
","contentId":"12560605020063","contentText":"Global Tech Elites Gather, Sparking Ideas to Lead a New Chapter in the Digital Future From October 13 to 14, 2025, the highly anticipated 2025 VELOZA Global Technology Awards Ceremony Carnival · Singapore concluded successfully at the Marina Bay Sands International Convention and Exhibition Center in Singapore. This grand event was co-hosted by Veloza, Nexus 2140, and ME, with APG and OWAA as the main title sponsors, and Moore Labs, Feixiaohao, ODAILY, BlockBeats, and ChainCatcher as co-organizers. The event brought together thousands of representatives from the technology, finance, and blockchain sectors from more than ten countries worldwide, who jointly explored innovation and the future of the digital economy. This summit, themed \"Empowering the Real Economy, Driving the Digital Future,\" focused deeply on cutting-edge topics such as Web3 decentralized technology, artificial intelligence (AI), real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, cross-border payment innovation, and blockchain gaming ecosystems. Representatives from academic institutions, foundations, business leaders, and technical experts from the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, China, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia gathered together, creating a lively atmosphere with frequent exchanges of ideas. Summit Focuses on Cutting-edge Technology, Empowering the Global Digital Economy With the theme \"Empowering the Real Economy, Driving the Digital Future,\" the conference focused on core topics such as Web3 decentralized technology, artificial intelligence (AI), real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, cross-border payment innovation, and blockchain gaming ecosystems. Representatives from global academic institutions, renowned foundation leaders, business executives, and industry experts shared their insights in multiple high-level forums, engaging in heated discussions on topics such as \"How Technological Innovation Empowers the Real Economy\" and \"The Prospects of AI and RWA Integration,\" providing new ideas and directions for the development of the digital economy. Strong Lineup of International Guests · Fusion of Ideas and Perspectives Several foundation representatives from the United States delivered high-level keynote speeches and case studies, including: Allan W. Jennings, Esq (Vice Chairman of Velo Foundation North America / NASA Advisor), who elaborated on the cross-disciplinary integration from space technology to blockchain trust mechanisms; Gerard Mc Keon (Publisher of Black Tie International magazine), who shared the new role of Web3 in global media and brand communication; Juan Ardila (New York State Assemblyman), who interpreted the U.S. policy trends on digital assets and Web3 innovation; Paul Sladkus (CBS reporter, Emmy Award winner) and Edward Cologna (SRTV producer) discussed the integration trends of AI, film & television, and blockchain technology. Meanwhile, in-depth analyses from Rich Teo, co-founder of Paxos stablecoin, Wall Street investor Jesse Weiner, and international financial analyst Ivy Ma (CFA) brought global perspectives on fintech to the audience. At this high-energy forum focusing on the new wave of AI+RWA and DeFi innovation, several industry leaders from around the world gathered to share forward-looking insights and thoughts on the core topics of \"asset tokenization, institutional participation, and intelligent finance.\" Tingtai Luo, founder of ATRNX.AI, took the stage first with the keynote speech \"AI+RWA Reshaping DeFi Trillion-level Liquidity: Launch of RWA Application Chain ATRNX.OS.\" He deeply analyzed how AI integrates with real-world assets to drive a new round of liquidity dividends in decentralized finance. Following that, Janice Tang (Chief Marketing Officer of Cregis) shared enterprise-level digital asset management solutions with the topic \"Digital Asset Solution for Enterprise\"; Sistine Chen (Chief Business Officer of exSat & Vaulta Labs) discussed the future logic of banking service innovation from a historical perspective with the topic \"From 1875 to 2025: Think Different About Banking Service.\" Adele Hu (Head of DeFi & RWA at Taiko) presented \"The Most Decentralized Layer 2 Network on Ethereum: Taiko Injects New Momentum into Institutional Asset Tokenization,\" showcasing the breakthrough potential of Layer 2 networks in the RWA ecosystem; Wang Hao, CFA, shared cutting-edge insights into the UAE's digital finance transformation with the topic \"Building Digital Finance Future — Insights from UAE.\" In addition, Chris (Executive Secretary-General of WBO & Co-founder of Dogecity) delivered an engaging keynote \"Building the DOGEconomy: How Dogcity Makes POW Mining Profitable and Fun,\" interpreting the commercial and community value of the PoW ecosystem from a unique perspective; Qian Yi's speech on global digital financial trends also sparked widespread discussion on site. Merlin M. Ostermann (Co-founder of Arkreen) discussed the ecological impact of green energy tokenization with \"From Tokenizing Green Energy to the Impact of Stablecoin\"; Abel Tiong (BD Manager of Plume) explained the key gateway for institutional RWA on-chain with \"The Institutional Gateway to Onchain Real-world Assets\"; Ash Datsiuk (Head of Growth at Theoriq) brought \"AI & Crypto: Managed Institutional Capital,\" exploring how AI empowers institutional capital management; finally, Jeff Ko (Chief Analyst at CoinEx) concluded with \"Crypto x TradFi — Blurring the Lines,\" analyzing the integration trend between crypto finance and traditional finance. Their speeches were pragmatic and forward-looking, resonating widely with the attendees. The atmosphere was enthusiastic, and after the event, many guests took group photos together as a memento. APG Launches Global Initiative, Leading a New Era of Privacy Finance As the main title partner of this summit, APG (Advanced Privacy Global) made a major announcement during the event, launching the APG Global Launch Conference. APG, as the global compliant privacy payment platform upgraded through the strategic acquisition by GCEX Group, is centered on zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARK), integrating cross-border clearing networks and intelligent compliance systems, and is committed to building a new financial infrastructure that is \"privacy-protecting, compliance-first, and globally accessible.\" At the conference, APG showcased its latest achievements in cross-border payments, digital identity verification, DeFi compliance services, and Web3 financial ecosystem development, and announced strategic cooperation with multiple international foundations and institutions to jointly promote the global standardization of privacy finance and compliance technology. This series of initiatives won high recognition from experts and institutional representatives present and was regarded as an important milestone in the process of Web3 financial compliance. The two-day summit was filled with lively discussions and fruitful results. Whether it was the in-depth exchange of ideas or the signing of international cooperation intentions, it marked that the Veloza Tech Innovation Expo has become an important bridge connecting Eastern and Western technological innovation and the digital financial ecosystem. The successful hosting of this grand event not only demonstrated Singapore's international influence as a global technology and financial center but also further cemented the global benchmark status of the Veloza Global Technology Awards Ceremony Carnival in the fields of Web3 and innovative technology. The 2025 Veloza Global Tech & Innovation Expo & Awards has come to a successful conclusion, but the journey of technological innovation continues. The resonance of global tech leaders' ideas will continue to drive the digital economy toward a more open, intelligent, and sustainable future.","createTime":"1760729585235","detailId":"3495841","id":"3495841","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"MetaEra","originPublishTime":"1760729585235","originUrl":"https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7580044","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/85f74e3676910713eeacf03ad9ca7a891760701681127.png","readCount":643,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,ETH,TKO","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1760729585235","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/0dca815da9d0914caba1713af5e072d2.png","sourceName":"Bitpush","title":"The 2025 Velo Global Technology Awards Carnival (Singapore) Concludes Successfully","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"Omnitrove is committed to bridging crypto-native assets with real-world financial infrastructure, providing a unified interface, AI-powered tools, and real-time prediction capabilities to empower diverse digital asset management scenarios and applications.","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
Original source: Omnitrove
New York, October 14, 2025 — As a highly scalable operating system supporting Web3 banking, Vaulta today announced the upcoming launch of its next-generation digital asset treasury management solution, Omnitrove, featuring high speed, low cost, and seamless on-chain interoperability. This platform aims to integrate fragmented digital asset operations into an intelligent, compliant, and intuitive all-in-one management system. With Omnitrove, institutions can easily manage complex asset portfolios, including diversified digital asset allocations, crypto wallet management, and global foundation hybrid asset portfolio governance. Omnitrove will become the core treasury hub for any organization holding digital assets on its balance sheet.
As an important component of the Vaulta Web3 banking operating system, Omnitrove will provide financial institutions with multiple enterprise-level features, including multi-party approval mechanisms and customizable workflows, ensuring secure and compliant fund flows while eliminating single-person operational risks.
In the future, the platform will also support real-time treasury forecasting and execution, enabling efficient decision-making and automated scheduling, and will introduce AI-driven treasury intelligence analysis to provide deep insights and customized recommendations for asset managers and complex treasury applications.
“We believe that the financial infrastructure of the future should combine the security and ease of use of today’s traditional enterprise financial solutions,” said Yves La Rose, Founder and CEO of the Vaulta Foundation. “As the digital asset market surpasses $4 trillion and continues to expand, many finance teams still rely on manual spreadsheets for operations, which presents significant limitations in terms of scale, visualization, and risk control. Omnitrove was created to change this reality—unifying fragmented asset management processes and helping institutions maintain a healthier financial system.”
At launch, Vaulta’s treasury management application will seamlessly integrate with multiple mainstream public chains, including Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), Vaulta ($A), Solana ($SOL), Avalanche ($AVAX), Base, Arbitrum ($ARB), Polygon ($POL), Optimism ($OP), HyperEVM ($HYPE), and major centralized exchanges such as Coinbase, Bybit, Binance, OKX, Kraken, covering millions of token assets. In addition, Omnitrove will directly support bank account connections and offer plug-and-play integration with professional accounting and HR platforms such as QuickBooks, Gusto, and NetSuite.
Omnitrove will also further expand the use cases for the Vaulta token ($A), creating sustained buying demand through rebate mechanisms and incentive models. In the future, the platform will introduce more AI integrations, which are included in subsequent roadmaps.
With a unified asset management dashboard, Omnitrove will consolidate all digital assets, optimize the allocation of idle assets, provide intuitive asset rebalancing recommendations, and help institutions achieve efficient capital flow between fiat and crypto assets.
The application is expected to be officially open to the public early next year.
About Vaulta
Vaulta is a highly scalable, high-performance Web3 banking operating system designed to provide developers and enterprises with unprecedented speed, reliability, and flexibility. As the core gateway connecting the Bitcoin ecosystem and an innovator in decentralized data management for the RAM market, Vaulta is redefining financial infrastructure by connecting the Web3 banking system with institutional-grade performance.
Based on a dynamically flexible underlying architecture, Vaulta supports virtual environments such as Vaulta EVM and exSat, offering complete data availability and cross-chain communication capabilities. With zero downtime, instant finality, and one of the lowest transaction costs in the industry, Vaulta is accelerating the advent of the next generation of financial frontiers—Web3 banking.
","contentId":"12560605014579","contentText":"Original source: Omnitrove New York, October 14, 2025 — As a highly scalable operating system supporting Web3 banking, Vaulta today announced the upcoming launch of its next-generation digital asset treasury management solution, Omnitrove, featuring high speed, low cost, and seamless on-chain interoperability. This platform aims to integrate fragmented digital asset operations into an intelligent, compliant, and intuitive all-in-one management system. With Omnitrove, institutions can easily manage complex asset portfolios, including diversified digital asset allocations, crypto wallet management, and global foundation hybrid asset portfolio governance. Omnitrove will become the core treasury hub for any organization holding digital assets on its balance sheet. As an important component of the Vaulta Web3 banking operating system, Omnitrove will provide financial institutions with multiple enterprise-level features, including multi-party approval mechanisms and customizable workflows, ensuring secure and compliant fund flows while eliminating single-person operational risks. In the future, the platform will also support real-time treasury forecasting and execution, enabling efficient decision-making and automated scheduling, and will introduce AI-driven treasury intelligence analysis to provide deep insights and customized recommendations for asset managers and complex treasury applications. “We believe that the financial infrastructure of the future should combine the security and ease of use of today’s traditional enterprise financial solutions,” said Yves La Rose, Founder and CEO of the Vaulta Foundation. “As the digital asset market surpasses $4 trillion and continues to expand, many finance teams still rely on manual spreadsheets for operations, which presents significant limitations in terms of scale, visualization, and risk control. Omnitrove was created to change this reality—unifying fragmented asset management processes and helping institutions maintain a healthier financial system.” At launch, Vaulta’s treasury management application will seamlessly integrate with multiple mainstream public chains, including Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), Vaulta ($A), Solana ($SOL), Avalanche ($AVAX), Base, Arbitrum ($ARB), Polygon ($POL), Optimism ($OP), HyperEVM ($HYPE), and major centralized exchanges such as Coinbase, Bybit, Binance, OKX, Kraken, covering millions of token assets. In addition, Omnitrove will directly support bank account connections and offer plug-and-play integration with professional accounting and HR platforms such as QuickBooks, Gusto, and NetSuite. Omnitrove will also further expand the use cases for the Vaulta token ($A), creating sustained buying demand through rebate mechanisms and incentive models. In the future, the platform will introduce more AI integrations, which are included in subsequent roadmaps. With a unified asset management dashboard, Omnitrove will consolidate all digital assets, optimize the allocation of idle assets, provide intuitive asset rebalancing recommendations, and help institutions achieve efficient capital flow between fiat and crypto assets. The application is expected to be officially open to the public early next year. About Vaulta Vaulta is a highly scalable, high-performance Web3 banking operating system designed to provide developers and enterprises with unprecedented speed, reliability, and flexibility. As the core gateway connecting the Bitcoin ecosystem and an innovator in decentralized data management for the RAM market, Vaulta is redefining financial infrastructure by connecting the Web3 banking system with institutional-grade performance. Based on a dynamically flexible underlying architecture, Vaulta supports virtual environments such as Vaulta EVM and exSat, offering complete data availability and cross-chain communication capabilities. With zero downtime, instant finality, and one of the lowest transaction costs in the industry, Vaulta is accelerating the advent of the next generation of financial frontiers—Web3 banking.","createTime":"1760498370271","detailId":"3469263","id":"3469263","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1760498370271","originUrl":"https://m.theblockbeats.info/news/59878","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":769,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,OP","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1760498370271","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/f513682fae92ad3dd8476db8615aec15.png","sourceName":"BlockBeats","title":"Vaulta continues to expand its institutional-grade service landscape with the launch of the new financial management platform Omnitrove","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"Omnitrove is committed to bridging native crypto assets with the real-world financial infrastructure, providing a unified interface, AI smart tools, and real-time prediction capability to empower diverse digital asset management scenarios and applications.","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n Source: Omnitrove \n
\n
\n
New York, October 14, 2025—As a highly scalable operating system powering Web3 banking operations, Vaulta today announced the upcoming launch of the next-generation digital asset treasury management solution Omnitrove. The platform aims to integrate disparate digital asset operations into an intelligent, compliant, and intuitive unified management system. With Omnitrove, institutions can easily manage complex asset portfolios, including digital asset diversification, crypto wallet management, and global foundation blended asset portfolio governance. Omnitrove will serve as the core financial hub for any organization holding digital assets on its balance sheet.
\n
\n
As a key component of the Vaulta Web3 banking operating system, Omnitrove will provide financial institutions with various enterprise-level features, including multi-party approval mechanisms and custom workflows, ensuring secure and compliant fund flows to eliminate single-person operational risks.
\n
\n
In the future, the platform will also support users in real-time financial forecasting and execution, enabling efficient decision-making and automated scheduling. It will introduce AI-driven financial intelligence analysis to provide in-depth insights and customized recommendations for asset managers and complex financial applications.
\n
\n
“We believe that the future financial infrastructure should combine the security and usability of current traditional financial enterprise solutions.” —Yves La Rose, Founder and CEO of Vaulta Foundation. “As the digital asset market surpasses $40 trillion in size and continues to expand, many financial teams still rely on manual spreadsheets for operations, which imposes significant limitations in scale, visualization, and risk control. Omnitrove is designed to change this status quo—streamlining dispersed asset management processes to help institutions maintain a healthier financial system.”
\n
\n
At the launch stage, Vaulta's treasury management app will seamlessly integrate multiple mainstream blockchains, including Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), Vaulta ($A), Solana ($SOL), Avalanche ($AVAX), Base, Arbitrum ($ARB), Polygon ($POL), Optimism ($OP), HyperEVM ($HYPE), and major centralized exchanges such as Coinbase, Bybit, Binance, OKX, Kraken, covering millions of tokenized assets. Additionally, Omnitrove will directly support bank account connections and achieve plug-and-play integration with professional accounting and HR platforms like QuickBooks, Gusto, NetSuite, and others.
\n
\n
Omnitrove will also further expand the use cases of the Vaulta token ($A) by creating sustained buying demand through a rebate mechanism and incentive model. In the future, the platform will also introduce more artificial intelligence integrations and incorporate them into the upcoming roadmap.
\n
\n
With a unified asset management dashboard, Omnitrove will integrate all digital assets and optimize the allocation of idle assets, providing intuitive asset rebalancing recommendations to assist institutions in achieving efficient capital flow between fiat and crypto assets.
\n
\n
The application is expected to be formally open to the public early next year.
\n
\n \n
About Vaulta
\n
\n
Vaulta is a highly scalable, high-performance Web3 banking operating system designed to provide developers and enterprises with unprecedented speed, reliability, and flexibility. As a core gateway connecting the Bitcoin ecosystem and an innovator in decentralized RAM market data management, Vaulta is redefining financial infrastructure to connect the Web3 banking system with institutional-grade performance.
\n
\n
Based on a dynamically flexible underlying architecture, Vaulta supports virtual environments such as Vaulta EVM and exSat, providing complete data availability and cross-chain communication capabilities. With zero downtime, instant finality, and one of the lowest transaction costs in the industry, Vaulta is accelerating the opening of the next generation financial frontier—Web3 banking.
\n
\n \n
","contentId":"12560605014604","contentText":"Source: Omnitrove New York, October 14, 2025—As a highly scalable operating system powering Web3 banking operations, Vaulta today announced the upcoming launch of the next-generation digital asset treasury management solution Omnitrove. The platform aims to integrate disparate digital asset operations into an intelligent, compliant, and intuitive unified management system. With Omnitrove, institutions can easily manage complex asset portfolios, including digital asset diversification, crypto wallet management, and global foundation blended asset portfolio governance. Omnitrove will serve as the core financial hub for any organization holding digital assets on its balance sheet. As a key component of the Vaulta Web3 banking operating system, Omnitrove will provide financial institutions with various enterprise-level features, including multi-party approval mechanisms and custom workflows, ensuring secure and compliant fund flows to eliminate single-person operational risks. In the future, the platform will also support users in real-time financial forecasting and execution, enabling efficient decision-making and automated scheduling. It will introduce AI-driven financial intelligence analysis to provide in-depth insights and customized recommendations for asset managers and complex financial applications. “We believe that the future financial infrastructure should combine the security and usability of current traditional financial enterprise solutions.” —Yves La Rose, Founder and CEO of Vaulta Foundation. “As the digital asset market surpasses $40 trillion in size and continues to expand, many financial teams still rely on manual spreadsheets for operations, which imposes significant limitations in scale, visualization, and risk control. Omnitrove is designed to change this status quo—streamlining dispersed asset management processes to help institutions maintain a healthier financial system.” At the launch stage, Vaulta's treasury management app will seamlessly integrate multiple mainstream blockchains, including Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), Vaulta ($A), Solana ($SOL), Avalanche ($AVAX), Base, Arbitrum ($ARB), Polygon ($POL), Optimism ($OP), HyperEVM ($HYPE), and major centralized exchanges such as Coinbase, Bybit, Binance, OKX, Kraken, covering millions of tokenized assets. Additionally, Omnitrove will directly support bank account connections and achieve plug-and-play integration with professional accounting and HR platforms like QuickBooks, Gusto, NetSuite, and others. Omnitrove will also further expand the use cases of the Vaulta token ($A) by creating sustained buying demand through a rebate mechanism and incentive model. In the future, the platform will also introduce more artificial intelligence integrations and incorporate them into the upcoming roadmap. With a unified asset management dashboard, Omnitrove will integrate all digital assets and optimize the allocation of idle assets, providing intuitive asset rebalancing recommendations to assist institutions in achieving efficient capital flow between fiat and crypto assets. The application is expected to be formally open to the public early next year. About Vaulta Vaulta is a highly scalable, high-performance Web3 banking operating system designed to provide developers and enterprises with unprecedented speed, reliability, and flexibility. As a core gateway connecting the Bitcoin ecosystem and an innovator in decentralized RAM market data management, Vaulta is redefining financial infrastructure to connect the Web3 banking system with institutional-grade performance. Based on a dynamically flexible underlying architecture, Vaulta supports virtual environments such as Vaulta EVM and exSat, providing complete data availability and cross-chain communication capabilities. With zero downtime, instant finality, and one of the lowest transaction costs in the industry, Vaulta is accelerating the opening of the next generation financial frontier—Web3 banking.","createTime":"1760466660309","detailId":"3465467","id":"3465467","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1760447163000","originUrl":"https://m.theblockbeats.info/en/news/59878","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":539,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BTC,A,OP","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1760447163000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/f513682fae92ad3dd8476db8615aec15.png","sourceName":"BlockBeats","title":"Vaulta continues to expand its institutional-grade service offering and launches the all-new financial management platform, Omnitrove.","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
A car giant has agreed to pay its customers in the US and Puerto Rico thousands of dollars to settle accusations that certain vehicles were sold with defective turbochargers.
\n
According to the settlement administrator’s portal, the Volkswagen Group of America will pay up to $3,850 to customers who incurred out-of-pocket repair expenses for “failed or malfunctioned” turbochargers on various VW or Audi models that had not exceeded 8.5 years or 85,000 miles at the time of the repair, and whose repair was done by an unauthorized Volkswagen or Audi dealer.
\n
Various documents, including the original repair invoice, will be required to receive the payment.
\n
For turbocharger repairs or replacements done by an authorized Volkswagen or Audi dealer, the Volkswagen Group of America will reimburse its customers half the costs for vehicles that had not exceeded 8.5 years or 85,000 miles at the time of the repair.
\n
Among the cars the lawsuit claimed had defective turbochargers include the 2008 – 2024 models of the Audi A3, Audi A4, Audi A5, Audi A6, Audi Q3, Audi Q5, Audi TT, VW GTI, VW Golf R, VW Beetle, VW Jetta Sportwagen, VW Alltrack, VW Jetta Sedan, VW Jetta GLI, VW Eos, VW Passat, VW CC, VW Tiguan, VW Arteon, VW Atlas and the VW Atlas Cross Sport.
\n
As part of the settlement, Volkswagen Group of America will also extend the warranty period of various VWs and Audis manufactured between 2015 to 2024 until they reach 8.5 years or 85,000 miles, whichever comes first. The extended warranty will cover half of the repair expenses for a turbocharger by an authorized Volkswagen/Audi dealer.
\n
The settlement administrator, however, says that the Volkswagen Group of America will not offer reimbursement if the failures or malfunction of a turbocharger were “caused by abuse, misuse, alteration or modification, lack of proper maintenance, a collision or crash, vandalism and/or other impact or outside source.”
\n
Claims must be filed by November 29th, while the final approval hearing will be held on December 4th.
\n
Despite settling the lawsuit, the Volkswagen Group of America denies the claims and maintains that the turbochargers in its VW or Audi cars were not defective.
\n
Generated Image: Midjourney
\n \n
\n
","contentId":"12560604990990","contentText":"A car giant has agreed to pay its customers in the US and Puerto Rico thousands of dollars to settle accusations that certain vehicles were sold with defective turbochargers. According to the settlement administrator’s portal, the Volkswagen Group of America will pay up to $3,850 to customers who incurred out-of-pocket repair expenses for “failed or malfunctioned” turbochargers on various VW or Audi models that had not exceeded 8.5 years or 85,000 miles at the time of the repair, and whose repair was done by an unauthorized Volkswagen or Audi dealer. Various documents, including the original repair invoice, will be required to receive the payment. For turbocharger repairs or replacements done by an authorized Volkswagen or Audi dealer, the Volkswagen Group of America will reimburse its customers half the costs for vehicles that had not exceeded 8.5 years or 85,000 miles at the time of the repair. Among the cars the lawsuit claimed had defective turbochargers include the 2008 – 2024 models of the Audi A3, Audi A4, Audi A5, Audi A6, Audi Q3, Audi Q5, Audi TT, VW GTI, VW Golf R, VW Beetle, VW Jetta Sportwagen, VW Alltrack, VW Jetta Sedan, VW Jetta GLI, VW Eos, VW Passat, VW CC, VW Tiguan, VW Arteon, VW Atlas and the VW Atlas Cross Sport. As part of the settlement, Volkswagen Group of America will also extend the warranty period of various VWs and Audis manufactured between 2015 to 2024 until they reach 8.5 years or 85,000 miles, whichever comes first. The extended warranty will cover half of the repair expenses for a turbocharger by an authorized Volkswagen/Audi dealer. The settlement administrator, however, says that the Volkswagen Group of America will not offer reimbursement if the failures or malfunction of a turbocharger were “caused by abuse, misuse, alteration or modification, lack of proper maintenance, a collision or crash, vandalism and/or other impact or outside source.” Claims must be filed by November 29th, while the final approval hearing will be held on December 4th. Despite settling the lawsuit, the Volkswagen Group of America denies the claims and maintains that the turbochargers in its VW or Audi cars were not defective. Generated Image: Midjourney","createTime":"1759000380576","detailId":"3345364","id":"3345364","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"by Mark Emem","originPublishTime":"1758902400000","originUrl":"https://dailyhodl.com/2025/09/27/car-giant-handing-up-to-3850-per-customer-over-alleged-mechanical-defect/","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":480,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"TT,A","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1758902400000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/b04e2d4c9012c60c6b0bd849adfeb162.png","sourceName":"Daily Hodl","title":"Car Giant Handing Up To $3,850 Per Customer Over Alleged Mechanical Defect","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
Fosun Wealth Holdings, based in Hong Kong, has launched tokenized stocks of Israeli medical company Sisram Medical. The company is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which also aligns with Hong Kong's strategy to become a cryptocurrency and blockchain hub.
\n
According to a statement released on Tuesday, these stocks represent a market value of approximately $328 million and have been deployed through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic. The company stated that this plan utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and integrates Solana into its tech stack for issuance and settlement.
\n
Sisram Medical is an Israeli medical technology company with the stock code 1696.HK, and is the first equity asset introduced under this tokenization plan. Fosun also plans to further tokenize company bonds and stocks in the future, but has not disclosed specific companies or a timeline.
\n
","contentId":"12560604947754","contentText":"Fosun Wealth Holdings, based in Hong Kong, has launched tokenized stocks of Israeli medical company Sisram Medical. The company is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which also aligns with Hong Kong's strategy to become a cryptocurrency and blockchain hub. According to a statement released on Tuesday, these stocks represent a market value of approximately $328 million and have been deployed through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic. The company stated that this plan utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and integrates Solana into its tech stack for issuance and settlement. Sisram Medical is an Israeli medical technology company with the stock code 1696.HK, and is the first equity asset introduced under this tokenization plan. Fosun also plans to further tokenize company bonds and stocks in the future, but has not disclosed specific companies or a timeline.","createTime":"1756882560215","detailId":"3167392","id":"3167392","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1756882533000","originUrl":"https://www.cointime.ai/flash-news/hong-kong-fosun-tokenizes-shares-of-healthcare-company-valued-at-50101","pageType":6,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":536,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,SOL,S","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"0","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756882533000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/2c66cd1616f3aeafd90afc756f5a41ff.jpg","sourceName":"Cointime","title":"Hong Kong Fosun tokenizes shares of healthcare company valued at $328 million","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, Hong Kong-based Fosun Wealth Holdings has launched tokenized stocks of Israel-based Sisram Medical, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with a market capitalization of approximately $328 million. These stocks have been issued through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic platforms.
The company stated that the program utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and incorporates Solana into its technology architecture for the issuance and settlement of stocks. Sisram Medical is an Israeli medical technology company with the stock code 1696.HK, and is the first stock included in this program. Fosun also plans to tokenize more corporate bonds and stocks in the future, but has not yet specified which companies or the timeline involved.
","contentId":"12560604947671","contentText":"ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, Hong Kong-based Fosun Wealth Holdings has launched tokenized stocks of Israel-based Sisram Medical, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with a market capitalization of approximately $328 million. These stocks have been issued through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic platforms. The company stated that the program utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and incorporates Solana into its technology architecture for the issuance and settlement of stocks. Sisram Medical is an Israeli medical technology company with the stock code 1696.HK, and is the first stock included in this program. Fosun also plans to tokenize more corporate bonds and stocks in the future, but has not yet specified which companies or the timeline involved.","createTime":"1756878392755","detailId":"3166526","id":"3166526","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1756878392755","originUrl":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/article/2202853","pageType":5,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":826,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,SOL,ETH","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407365","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756878392755","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/b1e1522b9640f1453e2434d8f57f4c63.jpeg","sourceName":"Chaincatcher","title":"Hong Kong Fosun to tokenize $328 million worth of medical company stocks","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
According to Jinse Finance, Xinglu Technology, the wealth technology platform under Fosun Wealth Holdings, announced that it has jointly developed a full-process technical solution for Hong Kong Stock Performance-linked Token with FinChain, which was also incubated by Fosun Wealth Holdings. This solution has already been validated in real business scenarios of Fosun's Hong Kong-listed company, Sisram Medical, and has achieved multi-chain deployment on Ethereum, Solana, Vaulta (formerly EOS), and Sonic. It has become Asia's first technical solution for \"Hong Kong Stock Performance-linked Token\" with multi-chain operation capability.
","contentId":"12560604947455","contentText":"According to Jinse Finance, Xinglu Technology, the wealth technology platform under Fosun Wealth Holdings, announced that it has jointly developed a full-process technical solution for Hong Kong Stock Performance-linked Token with FinChain, which was also incubated by Fosun Wealth Holdings. This solution has already been validated in real business scenarios of Fosun's Hong Kong-listed company, Sisram Medical, and has achieved multi-chain deployment on Ethereum, Solana, Vaulta (formerly EOS), and Sonic. It has become Asia's first technical solution for \"Hong Kong Stock Performance-linked Token\" with multi-chain operation capability.","createTime":"1756863747498","detailId":"3165443","id":"3165443","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1756863747498","originUrl":"https://www.jinse.cn/lives/475306.html","pageType":5,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"","readCount":690,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,SOL,ETH","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407365","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756863747498","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/323d0f4a003606c9d9c2b05a94a7134f.png","sourceName":"金色财经","title":"Fosun to develop Hong Kong stock performance-linked tokens and complete multi-chain deployment on Ethereum, Solana, Vaulta, and Sonic","translateLanguageId":1,"translateStatus":3,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"Quick Take Fosun Wealth Holdings said it has tokenized Sisram Medical’s Hong Kong-listed shares valued at $328 million. The company said that the initiative utilizes Vaulta’s “Banking OS” and integrates Solana into its technology stack for issuance and settlement.","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n \n
Hong Kong-based Fosun Wealth Holdings has launched tokenized shares of Sisram Medical, an Israeli company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, aligning with the region's push to establish itself as a hub for cryptocurrency and blockchain.
The shares, representing about $328 million in market value, were deployed through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic, according to a Tuesday statement . The company stated that the initiative utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and integrates Solana into its technology stack for issuance and settlement.
Sisram Medical, an Israeli medical technology firm that trades under the ticker 1696.HK , is the first equity added under the initiative. Fosun also plans to tokenize additional corporate bonds and shares in the future, though it has not specified which companies or a timeline.
\"The tokenization of Fosun's listed companies reflects our commitment to financial innovation and digital transformation,\" said a Fosun spokesperson. \"Through Vaulta and Solana, we can expand access to our portfolio, offering investors new levels of transparency, efficiency, and inclusivity.\"
The launch comes as tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) gains momentum across the financial sector. The total RWA value reached $27.9 billion as of Tuesday, representing a 7.4% increase from the previous month, according to RWA.xyz data .
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560604948069","contentText":"Hong Kong-based Fosun Wealth Holdings has launched tokenized shares of Sisram Medical, an Israeli company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, aligning with the region's push to establish itself as a hub for cryptocurrency and blockchain. The shares, representing about $328 million in market value, were deployed through Vaulta, Solana, Ethereum, and Sonic, according to a Tuesday statement . The company stated that the initiative utilizes Vaulta's \"Banking OS\" and integrates Solana into its technology stack for issuance and settlement. Sisram Medical, an Israeli medical technology firm that trades under the ticker 1696.HK , is the first equity added under the initiative. Fosun also plans to tokenize additional corporate bonds and shares in the future, though it has not specified which companies or a timeline. \"The tokenization of Fosun's listed companies reflects our commitment to financial innovation and digital transformation,\" said a Fosun spokesperson. \"Through Vaulta and Solana, we can expand access to our portfolio, offering investors new levels of transparency, efficiency, and inclusivity.\" The launch comes as tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) gains momentum across the financial sector. The total RWA value reached $27.9 billion as of Tuesday, representing a 7.4% increase from the previous month, according to RWA.xyz data .","createTime":"1756894560080","detailId":"3168849","id":"3168849","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/7c24bfc350abd87321744febbe1c8d621756894514577.jpg","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"By Timmy Shen","originPublishTime":"1756828800000","originUrl":"https://www.theblock.co/post/368395/hong-kongs-fosun-tokenizes-328-million-rwa","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/96df7527c7d87e9d6bcea268d32425251756890008368.jpg","readCount":363,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"A,SOL,S","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756828800000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/39bab8d17d1e6f17e4db292d3415d7fd.png","sourceName":"The Block","title":"Hong Kong’s Fosun tokenizes shares of medical company valued at $328 million","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"- Tether minted $1B in USDT on Ethereum for the third consecutive day, totaling $3B, reflecting strong demand for the stablecoin on the network. - Tether abandoned plans to freeze USDT on five blockchains (Omni, BCH SLP, Kusama, EOS, Algorand), focusing instead on Ethereum and Tron, which hold 85% of USDT supply. - Stablecoin market cap reached $285.9B with USDT ($167.4B) and USDC ($71.5B) leading, while exchange reserves hit $68B, showing sustained liquidity demand. - Regulatory shifts like the U.S. GENIU","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
Tether recently minted an additional $1 billion in USDT on the Ethereum network, according to on-chain monitoring by Onchain Lens, marking the third consecutive day of significant USDT creation, with a cumulative total of $3 billion issued across these days. This activity highlights ongoing demand for USDT, especially on Ethereum, where it continues to hold a dominant position alongside USDC . As of the latest data, the stablecoin market cap stands at $285.9 billion, with USDT and USDC leading at $167.4 billion and $71.5 billion respectively.
\n
Tether has also revised its approach to support for USDT on several blockchains. It has abandoned its earlier plans to freeze USDT smart contracts on Omni Layer, Bitcoin Cash SLP, Kusama, EOS, and Algorand . While users will still be able to transfer tokens on these networks, Tether will no longer issue or redeem USDT directly on these chains. The decision reflects broader strategic considerations, including a focus on blockchains with strong developer activity, scalability, and user demand.
\n
Among the affected chains, Omni Layer holds the largest USDT supply, with a circulating balance of $82.9 million, significantly higher than the $4.2 million on EOS and the under $1 million on the remaining three chains. This change has been in development for two years, with initial announcements in August 2023 and further steps in June 2024. Tether has maintained its support for Ethereum and Tron , where USDT remains the most widely adopted stablecoin. Tron and Ethereum alone account for $80.9 billion and $72.4 billion of USDT supply, according to DeFiLlama.
\n
The broader stablecoin market has also seen notable developments. Stablecoin liquidity remains robust, though the rate of growth has slowed. Weekly expansions in stablecoin market capitalization have dropped to approximately $1.1 billion, down from the $4–8 billion weekly inflows seen in late 2024. Despite this slowdown, exchange reserves for stablecoins have hit record highs. As of August 22, the total stablecoin value held on exchanges reached $68 billion, with USDT and USDC accounting for $53 billion and $13 billion, respectively. These reserves indicate a continued appetite for liquidity among traders and institutions.
\n
Looking ahead, the stablecoin landscape appears poised for further regulatory and market evolution. The passage of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. and regulatory frameworks like the EU’s MiCA suggest that stablecoin issuance will become more transparent and standardized. Analysts anticipate that these changes will reinforce the U.S. dollar’s global dominance and drive the stablecoin market toward a $2 trillion valuation by 2028, as projected by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. These developments underscore the growing role of stablecoins not only in crypto ecosystems but also in broader financial infrastructure and cross-border payments.
\n
Source:
\n \n
\n
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560604942246","contentText":"Tether recently minted an additional $1 billion in USDT on the Ethereum network, according to on-chain monitoring by Onchain Lens, marking the third consecutive day of significant USDT creation, with a cumulative total of $3 billion issued across these days. This activity highlights ongoing demand for USDT, especially on Ethereum, where it continues to hold a dominant position alongside USDC . As of the latest data, the stablecoin market cap stands at $285.9 billion, with USDT and USDC leading at $167.4 billion and $71.5 billion respectively. Tether has also revised its approach to support for USDT on several blockchains. It has abandoned its earlier plans to freeze USDT smart contracts on Omni Layer, Bitcoin Cash SLP, Kusama, EOS, and Algorand . While users will still be able to transfer tokens on these networks, Tether will no longer issue or redeem USDT directly on these chains. The decision reflects broader strategic considerations, including a focus on blockchains with strong developer activity, scalability, and user demand. Among the affected chains, Omni Layer holds the largest USDT supply, with a circulating balance of $82.9 million, significantly higher than the $4.2 million on EOS and the under $1 million on the remaining three chains. This change has been in development for two years, with initial announcements in August 2023 and further steps in June 2024. Tether has maintained its support for Ethereum and Tron , where USDT remains the most widely adopted stablecoin. Tron and Ethereum alone account for $80.9 billion and $72.4 billion of USDT supply, according to DeFiLlama. The broader stablecoin market has also seen notable developments. Stablecoin liquidity remains robust, though the rate of growth has slowed. Weekly expansions in stablecoin market capitalization have dropped to approximately $1.1 billion, down from the $4–8 billion weekly inflows seen in late 2024. Despite this slowdown, exchange reserves for stablecoins have hit record highs. As of August 22, the total stablecoin value held on exchanges reached $68 billion, with USDT and USDC accounting for $53 billion and $13 billion, respectively. These reserves indicate a continued appetite for liquidity among traders and institutions. Looking ahead, the stablecoin landscape appears poised for further regulatory and market evolution. The passage of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. and regulatory frameworks like the EU’s MiCA suggest that stablecoin issuance will become more transparent and standardized. Analysts anticipate that these changes will reinforce the U.S. dollar’s global dominance and drive the stablecoin market toward a $2 trillion valuation by 2028, as projected by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. These developments underscore the growing role of stablecoins not only in crypto ecosystems but also in broader financial infrastructure and cross-border payments. Source:","createTime":"1756615740164","detailId":"3131248","id":"3131248","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/dc6081aeb94a482ff132759515396a461756615682344.png","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"Coin World","originPublishTime":"1756615684000","originUrl":"https://www.ainvest.com//news/ethereum-news-today-tether-rethinks-chains-focus-dominant-ethereum-tron-2508/","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/dc6081aeb94a482ff132759515396a461756615682344.png","readCount":660,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BGTEST002,A,ETH","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756615684000","siteImg":"","sourceName":"ainvest","title":"Ethereum News Today: Tether Rethinks Chains to Focus on Dominant Ethereum and Tron","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0},{"abstractContent":"","aiAnalyseLabelInfo":[],"author":"","avatar":"","content":"
\n
\n
\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n
\n
Tether has said that while USDT transfers on the five blockchains remain possible, no new USDT will be issued or redeemed.
\n
Tether is shifting its focus to Ethereum, Tron, and other high-demand networks.
\n
The stablecoin market is projected to reach $2T by 2028 amid rising US support.
\n
\n
Tether has adjusted its earlier plan to freeze USDT smart contracts on five blockchains, opting instead to let users continue transferring tokens while halting issuance and redemption.
\n
The change affects Omni Layer, Bitcoin Cash SLP, Kusama, EOS, and Algorand, networks that now represent only a fraction of USDT circulation.
\n
\n
\n
A shift from freezing to phasing out
\n
In July 2024, Tether announced it would cease redemptions and freeze tokens on the five chains starting September 1, 2025. However, in an August 29 communication , the company seems to have reversed the freeze, opting for a halt to issuance and redemption.
\n
However, following feedback from the communities tied to those blockchains, the company has revised its approach.
\n
While transfers will remain possible, Tether will no longer mint or redeem tokens on these chains, effectively leaving them unsupported.
\n
This move marks the end of an era for Omni Layer in particular, once the foundation for USDT issuance, now holding just under $83 million.
\n
EOS trails with a little over $4 million, while the remaining chains each carry less than $1 million.
\n
In contrast, Ethereum and Tron dominate the stablecoin’s footprint, with more than $150 billion issued between them.
\n
Focus shifts to high-demand ecosystems
\n
The decision underscores Tether’s strategy of consolidating around chains with strong liquidity and developer activity.
\n
Ethereum, Tron, and BNB Chain remain the company’s priority networks, while newer platforms such as Arbitrum, Base, and Solana are gaining traction, particularly for rival USDC.
\n
By reducing attention to legacy blockchains, Tether aims to streamline resources toward ecosystems that promise scalability, user demand, and integration with broader digital finance.
\n
Stablecoins entering a new policy era
\n
Tether’s recalibration highlights the balancing act between legacy commitments and future opportunities.
\n
While tokens on Omni, EOS, and other discontinued chains remain transferable, the company’s attention is firmly fixed on larger, more dynamic ecosystems.
\n
At the same time, traditional finance players such as Western Union are exploring stablecoins to modernise remittances and improve currency conversion, pointing to a broader wave of adoption.
\n
Additionally, the timing of Tether’s move coincides with growing policy support for stablecoins in the United States.
\n
The recent GENIUS Act , signed by President Trump, provides regulatory backing for dollar-pegged assets as a tool to extend US currency influence in digital markets.
\n
In addition, the US Treasury projects that the stablecoin sector could exceed $2 trillion by 2028, up from its current $285.9 billion.
\n
Ripple’s chief executive has suggested growth may accelerate even faster, potentially reaching that mark within just a few years.
\n
As stablecoins expand into payments, savings, and global transfers, Tether’s shift reflects both market realities and the demands of a sector rapidly preparing for trillion-dollar growth.
\n
\n
","contentId":"12560604941898","contentText":"Tether has said that while USDT transfers on the five blockchains remain possible, no new USDT will be issued or redeemed. Tether is shifting its focus to Ethereum, Tron, and other high-demand networks. The stablecoin market is projected to reach $2T by 2028 amid rising US support. Tether has adjusted its earlier plan to freeze USDT smart contracts on five blockchains, opting instead to let users continue transferring tokens while halting issuance and redemption. The change affects Omni Layer, Bitcoin Cash SLP, Kusama, EOS, and Algorand, networks that now represent only a fraction of USDT circulation. A shift from freezing to phasing out In July 2024, Tether announced it would cease redemptions and freeze tokens on the five chains starting September 1, 2025. However, in an August 29 communication , the company seems to have reversed the freeze, opting for a halt to issuance and redemption. However, following feedback from the communities tied to those blockchains, the company has revised its approach. While transfers will remain possible, Tether will no longer mint or redeem tokens on these chains, effectively leaving them unsupported. This move marks the end of an era for Omni Layer in particular, once the foundation for USDT issuance, now holding just under $83 million. EOS trails with a little over $4 million, while the remaining chains each carry less than $1 million. In contrast, Ethereum and Tron dominate the stablecoin’s footprint, with more than $150 billion issued between them. Focus shifts to high-demand ecosystems The decision underscores Tether’s strategy of consolidating around chains with strong liquidity and developer activity. Ethereum, Tron, and BNB Chain remain the company’s priority networks, while newer platforms such as Arbitrum, Base, and Solana are gaining traction, particularly for rival USDC. By reducing attention to legacy blockchains, Tether aims to streamline resources toward ecosystems that promise scalability, user demand, and integration with broader digital finance. Stablecoins entering a new policy era Tether’s recalibration highlights the balancing act between legacy commitments and future opportunities. While tokens on Omni, EOS, and other discontinued chains remain transferable, the company’s attention is firmly fixed on larger, more dynamic ecosystems. At the same time, traditional finance players such as Western Union are exploring stablecoins to modernise remittances and improve currency conversion, pointing to a broader wave of adoption. Additionally, the timing of Tether’s move coincides with growing policy support for stablecoins in the United States. The recent GENIUS Act , signed by President Trump, provides regulatory backing for dollar-pegged assets as a tool to extend US currency influence in digital markets. In addition, the US Treasury projects that the stablecoin sector could exceed $2 trillion by 2028, up from its current $285.9 billion. Ripple’s chief executive has suggested growth may accelerate even faster, potentially reaching that mark within just a few years. As stablecoins expand into payments, savings, and global transfers, Tether’s shift reflects both market realities and the demands of a sector rapidly preparing for trillion-dollar growth.","createTime":"1756593960260","detailId":"3127858","id":"3127858","imgUrlsList":[],"imgUrlsStr":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/1c8d902d313893770808bff02f484f2d1756549800873.jpg","labelTypeList":[],"labelVos":[],"labels":"","languageId":"0","likeCount":0,"myLike":0,"originAuthor":"","originPublishTime":"1756593902000","originUrl":"https://coinjournal.net/news/tether-reverses-usdt-freezing-on-5-chains-allows-transfers-but-ends-issuance/","pageType":7,"pathSuffix":"","profileImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/1c8d902d313893770808bff02f484f2d1756549800873.jpg","readCount":1069,"relatedCoinList":[],"relatedCoins":"BGTEST002,A,ETH","retweetsCount":"0","retweetsCountV2":0,"sectionId":"12508313407451","sectionName":"","showTime":"1756593902000","siteImg":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/web/1feadfc2e719cb5d635ae6ad6915fb22.jpeg","sourceName":"Coinjournal","title":"Tether reverses USDT freezing on 5 chains, allows transfers, but ends issuance","translateStatus":0,"videoUrlsList":[],"videoUrlsStr":"","vip":0}],"recommendNewsList":[],"topNewsList":[],"total":0},"internalLinks":[],"assetCoinList":[{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":12,"coinId":328,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/eefad7f003666a3597a994ed5dea4b6f1710262881522.png","name":"Monero","normalizedName":"monero","percentChange24h":-0.7538221,"price":473.44672,"status":2,"symbol":"XMR"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":14,"coinId":3957,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/90c7b754d332f9b3696ebae68792c5691710694954592.png","name":"UNUS SED LEO","normalizedName":"unus-sed-leo","percentChange24h":-0.79447097,"price":9.157094,"status":2,"symbol":"LEO"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":18,"coinId":1437,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/48abfbba826c28de6702c0468d6f976b1710522085726.png","name":"Zcash","normalizedName":"zcash","percentChange24h":3.400771,"price":393.69748,"status":2,"symbol":"ZEC"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":33,"coinId":27075,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/790bec3a0a96866b8dfc2f6528088b701710609072797.png","name":"Mantle","normalizedName":"mantle","percentChange24h":6.065669,"price":0.9207988,"status":2,"symbol":"MNT"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":38,"coinId":3897,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/9915c51496568da2205d69237f3dc9991710954145849.png","name":"OKB","normalizedName":"okb","percentChange24h":3.3870046,"price":107.276215,"status":2,"symbol":"OKB"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":47,"coinId":33793,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/global-dollar.png","name":"Global Dollar","normalizedName":"global-dollar-usdg","percentChange24h":0.00489924,"price":0.99959874,"status":2,"symbol":"USDG"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":51,"coinId":2087,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/94d8510a434f0a9689bad144c5bd2b8c1701622933859.png","name":"KuCoin Token","normalizedName":"kucoin-token","percentChange24h":2.6400979,"price":10.945866,"status":2,"symbol":"KCS"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":58,"coinId":4269,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/f4cd14f4018646895c6708496f1518681712053852156.png","name":"GateToken","normalizedName":"gatetoken","percentChange24h":2.3832128,"price":10.054133,"status":2,"symbol":"GT"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":64,"coinId":39064,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/midnight-network.png","name":"Midnight","normalizedName":"midnight-network","percentChange24h":0.40784883,"price":0.05868476,"status":2,"symbol":"NIGHT"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":72,"coinId":131,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/7219717261d567a358f5d9bb1ef3654e1710262871538.png","name":"Dash","normalizedName":"dash","percentChange24h":0.4255379,"price":61.97308,"status":2,"symbol":"DASH"},{"bgCoinName":"Euro Coin","bgSymbol":"EUROC","cmcRank":107,"coinId":20641,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/cc6080c7dde467fd929e716df2b559361710436151131.png","name":"EURC","normalizedName":"eurc","percentChange24h":0.88320714,"price":1.1983503,"status":2,"symbol":"EURC"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":118,"coinId":28081,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/cc07e10cb45f34cdefa77f2989c81b3e1712768982599.png","name":"SPX6900","normalizedName":"spx6900","percentChange24h":6.380305,"price":0.3955802,"status":2,"symbol":"SPX"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":122,"coinId":1168,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/a6d7ac63325374121df7e060d6093ff61710522079163.png","name":"Decred","normalizedName":"decred","percentChange24h":-8.929451,"price":19.124939,"status":2,"symbol":"DCR"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":138,"coinId":7326,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/5d7643858213984a098391cb74fa783d1710522266939.png","name":"DeXe","normalizedName":"dexe","percentChange24h":0.9992859,"price":2.9827049,"status":2,"symbol":"DEXE"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":146,"coinId":10508,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/c5007fefab792d7db1caf73d0cce12a11710263172175.png","name":"Fluid","normalizedName":"instadapp","percentChange24h":9.936214,"price":3.082994,"status":2,"symbol":"FLUID"},{"bgCoinName":"1000SATS","bgSymbol":"1000SATS","cmcRank":146,"coinId":28683,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/d01176d9fe9b7630aa3a63eb802a18c01711127478212.png","name":"SATS","normalizedName":"sats","percentChange24h":4.5841193,"price":0.00028438505,"status":2,"symbol":"1000SATS"},{"bgCoinName":"eCash","bgSymbol":"XEC","cmcRank":151,"coinId":10791,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/f745f5a97f8a5cd3b7a155b784ea7e861710349507495.png","name":"eCash","normalizedName":"ecash","percentChange24h":1.2210906,"price":0.0000104113205,"status":2,"symbol":"XEC"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":164,"coinId":30494,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/eigenlayer.png","name":"EigenCloud","normalizedName":"eigenlayer","percentChange24h":4.9027276,"price":0.33779186,"status":2,"symbol":"EIGEN"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":174,"coinId":38590,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/bianrensheng.png","name":"币安人生","normalizedName":"bianrensheng","percentChange24h":8.150942,"price":0.16232173,"status":2,"symbol":"币安人生"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":175,"coinId":28298,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/beam.png","name":"Beam","normalizedName":"onbeam","percentChange24h":8.812751,"price":0.0031762668,"status":2,"symbol":"BEAM"}],"otherCryptoList":[{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":2640,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/wawllet.png","name":"WCOIN","normalizedName":"wawllet","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"WIN"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26402,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/ggbond-co.png","name":"GGBond","normalizedName":"ggbond-co","percentChange24h":2e-8,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"GGBOND"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26411,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/a4ba90775e3eb74f384b7711d6989ab61692858433191.6411.png","name":"Housing and Crypto Finance","normalizedName":"housing-and-crypto-finance","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"HCF"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26422,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/f6e126f56acc91ce7fe2c7d60f1a31541687767127233.6422.png","name":"Clint Eastwood","normalizedName":"clint-eastwood","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"CLINT"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26424,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/cryptobookie-app.png","name":"Cryptobookie.app","normalizedName":"cryptobookie-app","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"BOOKIE"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26436,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/add4ac4f016d40e23764c8cd57358f8f1711213809186.png","name":"Noso","normalizedName":"noso","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"NOSO"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26439,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/a348f6edf5be0b459d9db7143f75ba781692858426076.6439.png","name":"KEKW","normalizedName":"kekw","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"KEKW"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":26446,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/5a603f16fd6f5dec9a85df1b5ca116501701538391136.png","name":"Mr Potato Token","normalizedName":"mr-potato-token","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"$MRPOTATO"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":2645,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/bf01fff66813c4c50011a2776100f4a91711213323225.png","name":"U Network","normalizedName":"u-network","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"UUU"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":2646,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/adhive.png","name":"AdHive","normalizedName":"adhive","percentChange24h":5.1739893,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"ADH"}],"relatedCryptoList":[{"bgCoinName":"Bitcoin","bgSymbol":"BTC","coinId":1,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/bitcoin.png","name":"Bitcoin","normalizedName":"bitcoin","symbol":"BTC"},{"bgCoinName":"Dogecoin","bgSymbol":"DOGE","coinId":74,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/dogecoin.png","name":"Dogecoin","normalizedName":"dogecoin","symbol":"DOGE"},{"bgCoinName":"Ethereum","bgSymbol":"ETH","coinId":1027,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/ethereum.png","name":"Ethereum","normalizedName":"ethereum","symbol":"ETH"},{"bgCoinName":"Worldcoin","bgSymbol":"WLD","coinId":13502,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/worldcoin.png","name":"Worldcoin","normalizedName":"worldcoin","symbol":"WLD"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7814,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/c79601ece7f345231630c6a62e8f12dd1710349435998.png","name":"Alaya","normalizedName":"alaya","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"ATP"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7815,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/59111fd5e470f75889b6480c596aa6a11692856253164.815.png","name":"DefiCliq","normalizedName":"deficliq","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"CLIQ"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7816,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/77663dd9eca6a2a751942efd827bebdb1710349436917.png","name":"Basis Share","normalizedName":"basis-share","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"BAS"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7821,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/440e155365d68cb4cd611dd4fdf34d7c1710349437182.png","name":"Royale Finance","normalizedName":"royale-finance","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"ROYA"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7826,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/feedd461455737e9549aaf79c28c8bf41710349438175.png","name":"Zoracles","normalizedName":"zoracles","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"ZORA"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7827,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/pcash.png","name":"PCASH","normalizedName":"pcash","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"PCH"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7830,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/street-credit.png","name":"Street Credit","normalizedName":"street-credit","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"CRED"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7831,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/narwhalswap.png","name":"Narwhalswap","normalizedName":"narwhalswap","percentChange24h":-0.56949216,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"NAR"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7832,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/realpay.png","name":"REALPAY","normalizedName":"realpay","percentChange24h":0,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"RAP"},{"bgCoinName":"","bgSymbol":"","cmcRank":999999,"coinId":7833,"logo":"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/coinPriceLogo/piswap-token.png","name":"PiSwap Token","normalizedName":"piswap-token","percentChange24h":0.03325937,"price":0,"status":2,"symbol":"PIS"}]},"dataUpdateCount":1,"dataUpdatedAt":1769598733582,"error":null,"errorUpdateCount":0,"errorUpdatedAt":0,"fetchFailureCount":0,"fetchFailureReason":null,"fetchMeta":null,"isInvalidated":false,"status":"success","fetchStatus":"idle"},"queryKey":["walletDetailsQuery","/how-to-sell/wallet/alpha-token"],"queryHash":"[\"walletDetailsQuery\",\"/how-to-sell/wallet/alpha-token\"]"}]}
![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/cb341facb3fdf349909076aaa1d1bd721769366200065.png\")
\n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/2ba864d849b718d16abc2dc119129d7c1769071882612.webp\")
Source: \n Santiment \n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/82ebd70c10a054f5d07838a1a1308a711769071882679.webp\")
Pump.fun price forms a rising broadening wedge on the daily chart — Jan. 22 | Source: \n crypto.news \n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/a6dcd50e391a128179b60400dbf051a01768591470737.png\")
\n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/69b6511f9b046c79b51e20b34a0de73a1768591470913.png\")
\n Vaulta price chart by CoinMarketCap \n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/spider-data/f34a8cce154cdc15d84e219e336e4ed31768591470982.png\")
\n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/70cfb79597f9ff761ea3af3ea58e403a1764171542251.webp\")
![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/56263ca83b9e6702563a8c541e6329e71764171542440.webp\")
![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/0be6fca28c93f5e114f8489d70f989e61764149449190.jpeg\")
![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/518d9e21030cde68b379c91abd444ff71764149449444.jpeg\")
![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/7c24bfc350abd87321744febbe1c8d621756894514577.jpg\")
\n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/dc6081aeb94a482ff132759515396a461756615682344.png\")
\n ![](\"https://img.bgstatic.com/multiLang/image/social/1c8d902d313893770808bff02f484f2d1756549800873.jpg\")
\n