Musk's Grokipedia: Is It Possible for AI to Deliver Unbiased Truth Without Human Editors?

Elon Musk's

has introduced Grokipedia, an AI-powered encyclopedia aiming to rival Wikipedia by presenting itself as a source for "the whole truth, and nothing but the truth," as reported by a Announced on October 25, 2025, the platform debuted with 885,279 AI-created articles—a fraction of Wikipedia's 7 million human-curated pages, but ambitious in its intent. Grokipedia's entries are generated and "fact-checked" by xAI's Grok AI, which Musk asserts will become "10x better" with future updates. The site features a simple interface, including a dark mode and search functionality, to enhance usability. Nonetheless, there are concerns about the dependability of AI-generated information and the risk of ideological slant.

The debut has already stirred debate. Grokipedia's articles on contentious subjects, such as gender transition, Donald Trump, and Musk himself, are said to display a conservative perspective. For example, its entry on Trump leaves out information about his acceptance of a luxury jet from Qatar and his endorsement of a Trump-branded cryptocurrency—details that Wikipedia includes. Likewise, Musk's Grokipedia profile omits mention of a controversial hand gesture at a rally, widely interpreted as a Nazi salute, which is referenced in Wikipedia's version. Such omissions have drawn criticism from experts and Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, who stressed that AI cannot match the thoroughness of human editors. "Wikipedia's knowledge is—and always will be—human," the Wikimedia Foundation remarked, also pointing out that Grokipedia relies on Wikipedia's content as training data.

Musk's accusations that Wikipedia is "woke" and skewed toward liberal views have motivated the creation of Grokipedia. He has previously advocated for withholding funding from Wikipedia until it becomes more balanced, and sees Grokipedia as part of a larger initiative to offer right-leaning alternatives to mainstream tech platforms. Still, the site's lack of user editing and opaque content moderation have sparked concerns about oversight. Unlike Wikipedia, which enables open editing and tracks revision history, Grokipedia limits users to submitting change requests through the Grok AI.

The Wikimedia Foundation has minimized Grokipedia's significance, emphasizing that Wikipedia's collaborative, human-driven mission remains unchanged despite AI competitors. Critics, however, warn that Grokipedia's dependence on AI-generated material could spread misinformation or reinforce particular viewpoints. Ryan McGrady from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, cautioned that whoever controls information sources holds significant power—a worry heightened by Musk's control over platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and xAI.

As Grokipedia develops, its ability to address issues of accuracy, bias, and openness will determine its future. With version 0.1 now available, Musk's AI-based encyclopedia is under close watch from both skeptics and the public, as the contest over the direction of online knowledge continues.