what is considered a correction in the stock market

what is considered a correction in the stock market

As of Dec. 23, 2025, according to Motley Fool reporting, the S&P 500 had gained about 17% in 2025; analysts noted valuation and policy variables among factors shaping market risk.

A clear, practical answer to the question what is considered a correction in the stock market: most market professionals call a correction a decline from a recent peak of roughly 10%–20%. In this article you will learn the conventional threshold, how corrections are measured, how they differ from dips, crashes, and bear markets, the common causes and mechanics, historical patterns, and sensible investor responses that fit different horizons and risk tolerances.

This entry uses plain language, cited facts, and practitioner conventions rather than any single regulatory rule. It is intended for beginners and experienced investors who want a compact, actionable reference.

Definition and conventional threshold

What is considered a correction in the stock market is primarily a convention, not a legal definition. Practitioners most often define a correction as:

• A decline of at least about 10% from a recent high, and
• Less than a 20% drop (which is commonly used as the conventional threshold for a bear market).

Because there is no single regulator that defines the term, different analysts may use slightly different cutoffs. The concept can apply to broad indices (for example, the S&P 500), to market sectors (technology, energy), or to individual securities. When people ask what is considered a correction in the stock market, they usually mean a market-wide pullback large enough to be meaningful but not yet a multi-month or multi-year bear market.

How a correction is measured

Corrections are measured from peak to trough. The basic steps are:

1. Identify the most recent closing high (the peak).
2. Identify the subsequent lowest close (the trough).
3. Calculate percent decline = (peak − trough) / peak × 100%.

Important nuances:

• Declarations are retrospective. A market may look like it is correcting intraday, but an official recognition tends to wait until a closing price confirms the drawdown.
• Some analysts measure intraday extremes (highest intraday peak to lowest intraday trough) while others use closing prices only; closing-price measurements are more conservative and commonly cited.
• For individual stocks, the same peak-to-trough logic applies, but idiosyncratic volatility can make frequent double-digit pullbacks common.

When readers ask what is considered a correction in the stock market, they should also ask whether the measurement uses intraday or closing values and whether the reference peak is recent (weeks) or longer (months).

Correction vs dip, crash, and bear market

Terms sometimes used interchangeably have technical and practical differences:

• Dip: A small, short-lived pullback, often under ~10%. Dips are frequent and sometimes present buying opportunities for long-term investors.
• Correction: Roughly a 10%–20% fall from a recent peak. Larger than a routine dip, smaller than a bear market.
• Bear market: Commonly defined as a decline of 20% or more from a recent high, often accompanied by broader economic weakness and lasting months or years.
• Crash: A very rapid and steep decline, often occurring over days or weeks and sometimes driven by panic, liquidity shocks, or extraordinary events.

Whether a correction becomes a bear market is only provable in hindsight. A 15% decline may stop and recover the next month, or it may expand into deeper losses if economic or liquidity conditions deteriorate.

Common causes of corrections

What is considered a correction in the stock market can be triggered by many drivers. Common causes include:

• Shifting macro fundamentals: weaker GDP growth, slowing corporate earnings, rising inflation, or rising interest rates.
• Earnings shocks: disappointing company results or guidance can reverberate across sectors.
• Policy changes: monetary-tightening signals, tax or tariff changes, or major regulatory moves.
• Geopolitical or exogenous events: natural disasters, pandemics, supply-chain shocks.
• Sentiment shifts and de-risking: flows out of risk assets, reductions in leverage, or large institutional portfolio adjustments.

Corrections are often a mix of fundamental reassessment and changing risk appetite rather than a single cause.

Frequency, duration, and historical patterns

Historically, corrections occur regularly. Over long samples, major indices typically experience several corrections per decade. Key patterns:

• Frequency: Smaller pullbacks (<10%) are frequent; 10%–20% corrections happen multiple times across a decade, depending on the index and period studied.
• Duration: Corrections can last days to months. The median time to recover to a prior high varies by index and market regime.
• Outcome: Many corrections resolve with recoveries that resume the uptrend; some deepen into bear markets.

Statistics depend on the index and sample period. For example, corrections in large-cap U.S. indices during the post‑2008 era have often been shorter and shallower than corrections during major structural crises.

Market mechanics and behavioral factors

Several market mechanics and behavioral dynamics amplify corrections:

• Valuation dislocations: High valuations can increase sensitivity to bad news.
• Liquidity: Reduced liquidity or sudden withdrawals can accelerate price moves.
• Herd behavior: Correlated selling among funds and retail investors can magnify declines.
• Margin calls and deleveraging: Forced selling from leveraged accounts can push prices lower.
• Institutional positioning: Large rebalancing or flows from passive products can change buying/selling pressure quickly.

Understanding these mechanics helps explain why a modest fundamental shock sometimes produces an outsized market correction.

Economic and policy context

Monetary and fiscal policy, and macro indicators, commonly interact with corrections:

• Interest-rate expectations: Hikes can lower present values of future earnings, pressuring equities.
• Monetary policy communication: Central bank comments can swing sentiment quickly.
• Fiscal policy and tariffs: Changes that affect costs or demand can reprice sectors.
• Macro indicators: Employment, inflation, PMI, and consumer spending data feed into expectations for growth and corporate profits.

For context, multiple 2025 market commentaries highlighted valuation metrics and policy variables as drivers of market risk. As of Dec. 23, 2025, reporting noted the S&P 500 was up ~17% for the year while forward P/E ratios and the Shiller CAPE were higher than long-run averages—factors that analysts flagged when discussing the odds of future corrections. (Source: Motley Fool; data cited from FactSet and YCharts.)

Impact on investors and portfolios

Practical effects of a correction on investors include:

• Paper losses: Portfolio values decline but unrealized losses only become realized when positions are sold.
• Rebalancing triggers: Many plans or target allocations automatically sell winners and buy laggards; a correction can create rebalancing opportunities.
• Tax-loss harvesting: Investors may harvest realized losses to offset gains, subject to tax rules.
• Behavioral risks: Panic selling at low points can lock in losses and harm long-term outcomes.

Different investors feel corrections differently. Short-horizon or highly leveraged traders face higher risk; long-horizon investors may view corrections as normal market behavior and potential buying windows.

Typical investor responses and recommended approaches

Common approaches investors take when facing a correction include:

• Do nothing / stay the course: For long-term investors with an established plan, staying invested often remains the recommended default.
• Rebalance: Restore target allocations by reducing overweight positions and buying underweights created by the correction.
• Dollar-cost averaging / buy the dip: Systematic purchases over time can lower average cost; opportunistic buying requires a view on timing and quality.
• Opportunistic buying: Selectively increasing exposure to high-quality, resilient businesses.
• Risk reduction: Tactical hedging (options or inverse products), increasing cash, or trimming speculative positions.
• Consult financial plan or advisor: Decisions should align with goals, horizon, and risk tolerance.

Note: This section explains common practice, not personalized investment advice. What is considered a correction in the stock market does not automatically dictate a single correct action for all investors.

Trading strategies during corrections

Active traders and professionals may use higher-risk strategies during corrections:

• Shorting equities or sectors expected to fall further.
• Inverse or leveraged ETFs to express short exposure (note higher costs and path dependency).
• Put options to hedge or speculate on downside moves.
• Volatility trades: trading VIX futures or options to profit from rising realized volatility.
• Tactical reallocation between sectors or into cash-equivalents.

These strategies carry elevated risks: leverage amplifies losses, options decay over time, and timing short-term market turns is difficult.

Indicators and signals used to monitor corrections

Analysts and traders watch a set of indicators to judge the breadth, intensity, and potential turning points of a correction:

• VIX and other volatility measures.
• Market breadth (advance/decline lines, number of stocks hitting new lows vs highs).
• Volume: Increasing volume on down days can indicate stronger selling pressure.
• Moving averages and technical support levels (e.g., 50-day, 200-day moving averages).
• Drawdowns from recent peaks and the pace of decline.
• Credit spreads and fixed-income liquidity.
• Macro releases: inflation, employment, PMI, consumer confidence.

No single indicator is definitive. Combinations of signals and context matter when interpreting moves.

Corrections for individual stocks vs indices

Individual securities often have larger and more frequent corrections than broad market indices. Key differences:

• Idiosyncratic risk: Company-specific news (earnings misses, management changes, fraud) can trigger large declines that aren’t reflective of the market.
• Magnitude: Single stocks can drop far more than 20% in short periods, so a 10% threshold feels routine for many equities.
• Diversification: Indices smooth idiosyncratic swings, which is why the 10%–20% convention is most useful for broad markets.

When asking what is considered a correction in the stock market, remember that thresholds for individual securities are less informative without context about volatility and fundamentals.

Differences in other asset classes and crypto markets

The 10% convention applies differently across asset classes:

• Bonds: Price moves are influenced by yield changes; a 10% move in bond prices is large and rare for high-quality sovereign debt but can occur in lower-rated credit.
• Commodities: Individual commodities can be volatile; percentage thresholds are valid but should be set with commodity-specific context.
• Cryptocurrencies: Crypto markets are much more volatile and trade 24/7. What is considered a correction in crypto often uses larger thresholds (e.g., 20%–50%) or shorter timeframes because double-digit drops are frequent. Exchange structure, continuous trading, and liquidity differences mean crypto corrections behave differently.

For crypto traders, platforms like Bitget and wallets such as Bitget Wallet support trading and custody in markets that experience faster and deeper corrections; these products also expose users to round-the-clock volatility.

Limitations and critique of the 10% rule

The 10% threshold is an arbitrary but useful rule of thumb. Limitations include:

• Simplicity: It reduces complex market dynamics to a single number.
• Market regimes: High-volatility periods may make a 10% move routine; low-volatility regimes make it notable.
• Timing: Labels can be misleading; calling something a “correction” does not predict whether it will deepen.

Analysts use the 10% rule as shorthand, but it should be combined with macro, valuation, and liquidity context when assessing risk.

Notable historical examples and case studies

Short case summaries help illustrate how corrections and related events behave:

• Black Monday (Oct. 19, 1987): A rapid global equity crash where markets fell dramatically in a single day; large, fast declines can occur even without prolonged economic downturns.

• Dot-com bust (2000–2002): A prolonged period in which excessive valuation in technology stocks reversed into a multi-year decline; what began as sector corrections evolved into a broader bear market.

• Global Financial Crisis (2007–2009): A systemic financial shock that moved beyond corrections into a deep bear market accompanied by severe economic contraction.

• COVID-19 crash (Feb–Mar 2020): A very rapid sell-off (a crash) followed by an unusually quick recovery; policy responses and liquidity injections influenced the rebound.

• Mid-2020s valuation warnings (2024–2025): As of Dec. 23, 2025, data cited by market commentators showed the S&P 500 with forward P/E near 21.8 and a Shiller CAPE around 40.7—levels above historical averages. Analysts referenced these valuation metrics when discussing how likely a market correction might be in the near future. (Sources cited in reporting: FactSet, YCharts, Motley Fool.)

These examples show that corrections vary in speed, duration, and outcome; some resolve quickly, others foreshadow deep bear markets.

Policy, media, and market communication

Media coverage and official statements can shape investor behavior during corrections:

• Analysts and outlets may label declines as corrections, bear markets, or crashes; such labels influence retail sentiment.
• Central bank communications (policy statements, minutes) can calm or unsettle markets.
• Corporate guidance and large institutional filings can move prices and shift expectations.

Clear, factual communication helps markets digest shocks; sensationalism can exacerbate behavioral reactions.

Glossary of related terms

• Drawdown: Percent decline from a previous peak to a trough.
• Peak: The highest recent price or index level before a decline.
• Trough: The lowest price reached during a decline.
• Volatility: The statistical dispersion (often standard deviation) of returns.
• Bear market: A decline of 20% or more from a previous high.
• Crash: A very rapid and large decline over a short period.
• Dip: A relatively small, short-lived pullback.
• Market breadth: A measure of how many stocks participate in a move (e.g., advances vs declines).
• VIX: A commonly cited index measuring implied volatility of S&P 500 options.

See also

• Bear market
• Market crash
• Volatility index (VIX)
• Drawdown (finance)
• Dollar-cost averaging
• Rebalancing

References and further reading

Sources commonly used by practitioners and investor-education pages informed this article. Representative sources include investor education material and data providers (examples): Fidelity, Charles Schwab, NerdWallet, Wikipedia, The Motley Fool, SoFi, FactSet Research, YCharts, and the Federal Reserve. Data points cited in the body (forward P/E, CAPE, S&P 500 performance as of Dec. 23, 2025) were referenced in reporting from major market commentary that cited FactSet and YCharts; the performance summary and discussion of tariffs and policy effects were included in market coverage dated Dec. 23, 2025. Readers should consult primary data providers and official filings for verification of numeric values.

--

Further exploration: If you trade or explore markets beyond equities—such as crypto—remember market structure differences matter. For crypto custody and trading tools, consider Bitget and Bitget Wallet for trading access and secure custody services.

Ready to learn more? Explore Bitget’s educational resources and market tools to align your strategy with your time horizon and risk profile.